Jump to content

Demonland Player of the Year

Featured Replies

 

6. Bruce

5. Jurrah

4. Scully

3. Jones

2. McDonald

1. Watts

We badly missed Davey and Sylvia today. Bennell seriously needs to be dropped, and Newton...well...

6- Bruce (his best game of the year, credit for actually leading from the front)

5- Jurrah (freak)

4- Scully

3- McKenzie

2- Rivers

1- Junior

 

6 - Liam Jurrah

5 - James McDonald

4 - Cameron Bruce

3 - Jordie McKenzie

2 - Jack Watts

1 - Austin Wonaeamirri


6 - Jurrah

5 - Bruce

4 - McDonald

3 - Watts

2 - Wonaeamirri

1 - Scully

6 - Bruce - by a mile

5 - Jurrah - by half a mile

4 - Scully - by weight of possessions

3 - Rivers - many mistakes , but put in

2 - Moloney - never stopped trying but tired badly

1 - Garland - many mistakes but put in

6 - Jurrah

5 - Bruce (stakes his claim for captaincy that bit more)

4 - Frawley

3 - Scully

2 - Morton

1 - Rivers

 

6 - Tom Scully

5 - Jordie McKenzie

4 - Liam Jurrah

3 - Cameron Bruce

2 - James McDonald

1 - Jared Rivers

6 - Bruce - by a mile

5 - Jurrah - by half a mile

4 - Scully - by weight of possessions

3 - Rivers - many mistakes , but put in

2 - Moloney - never stopped trying but tired badly

1 - Garland - many mistakes but put in

I'm a big Garland fan, but he got smashed today. Frawley did a much better defensive job and his disposals were much cleaner.

Moloney was terrible too. Maybe he struggled after 4 weeks out, but he had no influence on the game, which is disappointing for a leader.

I thought that out of everyone in the leadership group, Bruce and Rivers were the two who stood out, but the more I think about it the more NQR next year's leader is going to be. If Grimes was just a little older, he would be the perfect candidate.


6 - Bruce

5 - McDonald

4 - Jurrah

3 - Scully

2 - Dunn (based solely on the first half)

1 - Watts Rivers

6 - Bruce - by a mile

5 - Jurrah - by half a mile

4 - Scully - by weight of possessions

3 - Rivers - many mistakes , but put in

2 - Moloney - never stopped trying but tired badly

1 - Garland - many mistakes but put in

No. He was towelled by Gray.

6) Jurrah (4 gls, highlights aplenty, will be a marquee player)

5) Bruce ( great first half, played like a leader)

4) Scully (exciting game, clangers were minimal, great goal on the bell)

3) McDonald (typical skipper performance)

2) McKenzie (liked his inside work, never gave up unlike others)

1) Aussie (made things happen, but wasn't a great effort overall)

I refuse to give any key defenders votes today. Their worst effort all year.

Something I liked about Scully: he took 6 running bounces. In a game in which we didn't take many risks and didn't play a lot of freeflowing football, at least Scully was trying.


6. Bruce

5. Scully

4. Jurrah

3. McDonald

2. McKenzie

1. Watts

6. Bruce (Great first half, solid second half, but a few costly errors)

5. Jurrah (Unbelievably exciting and very few, if any, errors)

4. McDonald (Very solid, as usual)

3. Scully (Lots of good, undone by too many disposal errors)

2. Rivers (Similar to Scully, but some of his errors were stupid and undisciplined)

1. McKenzie (Had to find someone for one vote, on a day when we had few 4 qtr. contribitors)

Disappointing day! We have to learn to win at that bloody ground.

6. Cameron Bruce

5. James Mcdonald

4. Tom Scully

3. Liam Jurrah

2. Clint Bartram

1. Jared Rivers

Mostly a poor performance all round. Missed Col, needed Grimes. Newton was a bad inclusion. :(

........................ Newton was a bad inclusion. :(

I disagree '99. Newton wasn't great, but I thought he contributed more around the ground than PJ has done in his recent games, he was no worse in the ruck.


 

6: Bruce

5: Jurrah

4: Scully

3: Junior

2: Rivers

1: MEH........

To many passengers. Moloney needed the run. Newton to the VFL for the rest of his football career, alot of the guys looked flat :S

To many easy shots on goal missed.

Let's all turn out next week for Juniors last game.

6 Junior

5 Bruce

4 Jurrah

3 Rivers

2 Scully

1 Moloney


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 0 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 135 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 422 replies