Jump to content

monoccular

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by monoccular

  1. Gun shy because we ended the HandA in top 4 three years in a row? Winning finals is super difficult. Ant the trade play - Maynard so we will get every Demon follower at every game just to boo him? As I recall there were only a handful of attendees at Collingwood and Carlton playing interstate clubs too. MCC waiting times for boys listed at birth is now I think something in the order of 30+ years.
  2. Fabulous news for the club. Now he needs to restart his kicking academy which appears to have paused last season. GO DEES.
  3. monoccular replied to biggestred's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Surely “keep the bastards honest” implies honesty presently exists. Surely (try to) make the bastards honest would be a more realistic way to put it.
  4. I think it has been raised before, but is it true that the Chairman of the Tribunal , who basically dictated to the tribunal that despite all the evidence Maynard was blameless, is a Collingwood member (if not even more involved in that club)? If so the AFL failed to address a massive conflict of interest. No surprise at all by the way. No wonder that at least some folk believe that the AFL may be corrupt to the core.
  5. monoccular replied to biggestred's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Of course, but that would be fair and equitable, so no way will AFL have that. You forgot our mandatory annual Geelong trip.
  6. monoccular replied to BaliDemon's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The succession plan likely involved Petty, JVR supported by Fritta and Melksham - stupidly they didn't think that the three experienced members of that group would all have significant injuries that impacted the structure throughout the season. They may also have thought that the Brundy Gawn experiment would work, but that perhaps more predictably clearly didn't.
  7. monoccular replied to Edm's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I may have said it before, but an "elite kick" isn't any use at all if he cannot get the ball. Accepting that we were a basket case out the time, so who know how any (and others) may have developed in a well run club, Strauss and Maria were drafted as "elite kicks" - sadly they rarely got the ball to display their elite skills,
  8. Really? Travel interstate every second week early in the season, play at Mordor, Tasmania?? Not bloody likely.
  9. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Gil’s legacy -Umpiring - now with 4 - at an all time low. Helped the Pies win 3 finals. -ARC - pathetically underfunded and helps Blues into finals and to win 2 - MRO, tribunal and appeals board hopelessly compromised, inconsistent and untrustworthy Enjoy your parting bonus and go off and play polo. Leave our game alone.
  10. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    You surely forgot the lizard Maynard
  11. Without a shadow of doubt the AFL will make to up as they go along The best thing would be to send the Roos hopping down to Hobart and become the Devils. Apart from anything else it would avoid making the "draw" aka FIXture even more inequitable by throwing in a bloody bye. We all know which teams will get the horror bye round 1 or 2, or last few rounds, and which ones will get it nicely spaced out.
  12. monoccular replied to BaliDemon's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    What I expect you are alluding to is that bone on bone means different things in different cases - no two are the same. I hope the you are not suggesting that those to whom you referred had better pain tolerance, or more determination than BB and TM.
  13. monoccular replied to Ouch!'s post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Nobody knows how Brundy would have gone for MFC in the finals because he wasn't selectedy. All else is speculation. Reading that transcript just reminds me why I don't listen to empty airheads on drive radio. Appalling and rude - and I expect she thought it was really funny.
  14. Reasonable alternative, though I would prefer to see him stretchered off in the first minute after Zorko takes him and Cox 😎out at the opening bounce.
  15. monoccular replied to RedFox's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Serious question Jimmy, why not? I have zero idea about Jordie’s coaching ability, but it was widely believed that he was the hardest worker in training - not the most skilled player but never say die type who I wouldn’t dismiss out of hand. Surely being a great player doesn’t necessarily make you e great coach, (Hird, Buckley, Voss #1) and vice versa. Jordie could inspire by his work ethic but who actually knows?
  16. He certainly finds space, is quick off the mark, and kicks straight. PS listening to the commentary reminds me (as if I needed reminding) just what an awful commentator is Derrwwwayne. Pretending to sound astounded at every play.
  17. monoccular replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Some do, some don’t ever. I am sure he is being closely monitored. đŸ€žđŸ™ No pressure on the guy who isn’t eligible for drafting, and if and when he does you are asking him to play the hardest position on the ground. Yes, it would be nice. Thanks.
  18. So one has to wonder why the hell was he named, then never used, as sub in a cutthroat semi final when our other tall forward wasn’t delivering anything much? Absolute mystery.
  19. Did both clubs “shop him out” or did / does Chol not want to play under Hardwick?
  20. monoccular replied to DeeSpencer's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    đŸ€” We should have learned from Sam Weideman - lovely guy, trains hard, but just zero aggression.
  21. Thanks for that summary. A smoky who I have totally forgotten about was Sestan. From what little I have seen of him (TV only) and heard he seems an excitement machine if he develops AFL level fitness. Another medium 188cm forward but with just a bit of a difference. May take another year but worth keeping an eye on. GO DEES
  22. monoccular replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Integrity and AFL in the same paragraph? Interesting. Ouch! That worked out really well in both our finals, didn’t it? North made PF what, 7 years ago, and have mismanaged their list. How do they qualify for special assistance?
  23. monoccular replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Perhaps that is exactly why McAdam prefers to play under the apprentice than under Burgess. Clarry was allowed time (frustrating as hell to him and to us) to recover; McAdam was, or feels he was, forced along too quickly and reinsured.
  24. Like father, like son. Looking forward to seeing a lot more of him over the coming years. IMVHO he would have been a far better sub that the ones we selected in both finals.
  25. Do we know which umpires awarded votes at all? Is it a consensus, or maybe they decide that one will do the votes this week, another next week. Maybe it is the senior one? Sure as hell #22 wouldn’t offer any to a Demon.