42 minutes ago, Norm Smith's Curse said:

Buckley's footy brain and tactical analysis is frankly some of the best and most detailed I've seen in recent years.

Suggesting Buckley and Hinkley are in the same bracket of tried coaches who never made it is a stretch.

The same crew who believe Buckley is past it, believe Oliver can get back to his best..

🧐

Talk about contradiction.

I suppose I can now share the following, which I sent as a private message here on April 3 this year:

''I don't often post rumours but I can tell you with certainty that Steven Smith has met for a coffee with Nathan Buckley re potentially coaching the MFC.

I can't tell you how the meeting went or if Buckley has any interest, because I don't know. I only know that they met.

I won't post this on the main forum because it serves no purpose and could potentially cause (further) instability. It's just not needed at the moment.

For me, Smith should conduct this sort of due diligence and I'm glad he's on the front foot. Of course, it may all come to nothing.''

I then heard from a second unrelated source, not long after, that Melbourne was keen on Buckley.

Tonight on 360 there will be Horse, Simpson and Goodwin. Will make for very interesting viewing.

2 minutes ago, Heart Beats True said:

Tonight on 360 there will be Horse, Simpson and Goodwin. Will make for very interesting viewing.

Can't they throw in Buckley for the quadrella?

4 minutes ago, Heart Beats True said:

Tonight on 360 there will be Horse, Simpson and Goodwin. Will make for very interesting viewing.

4 minutes ago, Gator said:

I suppose I can now share the following, which I sent as a private message here on April 3 this year:

''I don't often post rumours but I can tell you with certainty that Steven Smith has met for a coffee with Nathan Buckley re potentially coaching the MFC.

I can't tell you how the meeting went or if Buckley has any interest, because I don't know. I only know that they met.

I won't post this on the main forum because it serves no purpose and could potentially cause (further) instability. It's just not needed at the moment.

For me, Smith should conduct this sort of due diligence and I'm glad he's on the front foot. Of course, it may all come to nothing.''

I then heard from a second unrelated source, not long after, that Melbourne was keen on Buckley.

Thanks Gator.

Interestingly around that time period we had just come off the back of two back to back smashings from North and Gold Coast.

I remember after the North or Gold Coast game, I voiced openly that I was officially on the its time to move Goodwin on stage. Not only had supporters had enough but clearly so did our board members.

Clearly Buckley and Longmire are our standout targets it seems.

Edited Wednesday at 05:402 days by dazzledavey36

GIven we don't have a first round draft pick and we look to have a father son and possible NGA... Jason Taylor might have less to do this time of year. Can we put him on the coaching selection panel?

(only half joking)

Carlton could be about to join the hunt.

Surely we can do a little better than Kenneth HInkley.

13 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Carlton could be about to join the hunt.

1 hour ago, DubDee said:

The thought of winning a flag with Buckley as coach when he never won one after 25+years at the Pies would be enough for me to go with him

This really tempts me about Buckley. If you had to script a fairy tale flag, this would be the best story and it would [censored] off Collingwood people to no end. Just imagine him becoming a "Melbourne person" for life. Eddie wouldn't know what to do with himself!

5 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Carlton could be about to join the hunt.

It was clearly coming sooner or later.

We absolutely don't want to compete with Carlton for a coaching role, because while I personally think our list is better, Carlton as a big club has more to offer a senior coach in terms of support, facilities and financial opportunities.

On the flip side the pressure to not be another failed coach at Carlton is massive. It would take a brave man to join the long list of coaches who have failed at Ikon park since 1999.

17 hours ago, Dannyz said:

Entirely irreplaceable was Gus. A clear most valuable person and player. I’m sure Goody is a few red wines in tonight thinking of all the ‘What If?’ moments since 2021. None would be more prevalent than Gus’ early retirement.

Gus injury and retirement and melksham ACL cost us a flag

I’ll die on that hill

16 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

It was clearly coming sooner or later.

We absolutely don't want to compete with Carlton for a coaching role, because while I personally think our list is better, Carlton as a big club has more to offer a senior coach in terms of support, facilities and financial opportunities.

On the flip side the pressure to not be another failed coach at Carlton is massive. It would take a brave man to join the long list of coaches who have failed at Ikon park since 1999.

they have been a nothing club for nearly 30 years, cant see the next coach getting them out of the doldrums with that list either. i reckon bucks would want a quick turnaround and would rather choose melbourne, same with horse.

1 hour ago, Lord Travis said:

Buckley clearly has the desire for it, but I'm unsure if Longmire does. Buckley became a coach young, and appears to have grown a lot since. His analysis and commentary on the game is the best in the business. He gets the modern game and has a great football mind.

Longmire has a better coaching career, winning a premiership and making four other grand finals. He'd be number one choice if we want an experienced coach to set standards, followed by Buckley. For whatever reason, I don't rate Simpson as highly as though two.

If we want an up and coming assistant, Corey Enright and Ash Hansen are the ones I've heard are rated extremely highly and are defined to be senior coaches. Obviously we'd go through a selection process, but I'd hope those two were part of that and strong contenders.

I'm unsure what the right path is, but with how rudderless our club is from a leadership perspective, an experienced coach might be required. Whoever it is, they have a decent playing list to build on, and we could bounce quickly in the next two seasons, even if we lose a few senior core players and go the youth path.

Hansen will be sacked by the Blues I’m sure, I don’t want him anywhere near us

9 minutes ago, Deez21 said:

Gus injury and retirement and melksham ACL cost us a flag

I’ll die on that hill

I’ll be there alongside you on this one

I’m unsure if we should get Buckley but if we do and he gets a flag with us it’ll totally be worth it to see the Filth contorted into squirming, squally rage.

5 minutes ago, Tracca said:

they have been a nothing club for nearly 30 years, cant see the next coach getting them out of the doldrums with that list either. i reckon bucks would want a quick turnaround and would rather choose melbourne, same with horse.

You could be right, and I agree that their list is not in a great spot.

However lets not forget that we have entirely new leadership coming in, which is always a risk for a new coach. Our club has been in shambles off the field for at least 2 seasons. We have 2 important players who might want out. We train across 2 different venues, one of which is a fair way away for most people.

Do I think our list is an attractive proposition? Absolutely. I truly don't think we are as bad as our results show, but as a club we are not exactly screaming pick me.

26 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

It was clearly coming sooner or later.

We absolutely don't want to compete with Carlton for a coaching role, because while I personally think our list is better, Carlton as a big club has more to offer a senior coach in terms of support, facilities and financial opportunities.

On the flip side the pressure to not be another failed coach at Carlton is massive. It would take a brave man to join the long list of coaches who have failed at Ikon park since 1999.

If it makes everyone feel better, Carlton has won more wooden spoons in the AFL era (ie, 1991 onwards) than any other club. They have five in the Wooden Spoon drawer. We've only got three.

(I found that nugget here - a brief summation of various leadership matters in the AFL)

Edited Wednesday at 06:102 days by La Dee-vina Comedia
changed "cabinet" to "drawer"

29 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

It was clearly coming sooner or later.

We absolutely don't want to compete with Carlton for a coaching role, because while I personally think our list is better, Carlton as a big club has more to offer a senior coach in terms of support, facilities and financial opportunities.

On the flip side the pressure to not be another failed coach at Carlton is massive. It would take a brave man to join the long list of coaches who have failed at Ikon park since 1999.

Not one Carlton player selected in the 22 under 22 speaks volumes. They're lacking a lot more than people think.

Adam Simpson is the worst option IMO. Eagles may have won the flag in 2018 but watching them under Simmo was the blandest and most sleep inducing football I can recall.

His game style was also left in the dust a few years after the flag and the results post 2019 prove that.

4 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

You could be right, and I agree that their list is not in a great spot.

However lets not forget that we have entirely new leadership coming in, which is always a risk for a new coach. Our club has been in shambles off the field for at least 2 seasons. We have 2 important players who might want out. We train across 2 different venues, one of which is a fair way away for most people.

Do I think our list is an attractive proposition? Absolutely. I truly don't think we are as bad as our results show, but as a club we are not exactly screaming pick me.

no but our playing list is apparently united. our most important players are on long term contracts and arent going anywhere unless we allow them to, facilities wise whilst its a drive, casey is still very good. And hopefully this can be ironed out anyway in the near future.

I think onfield will be way more important to these two people than offield

4 minutes ago, At the break of Gawn said:

Not one Carlton player selected in the 22 under 22 speaks volumes. They're lacking a lot more than people think.

While I agree, they're no 1 pick last year Jagger Smith (touted to be the no1 pick overall) has been injured all year and some of their kids eg Moir showed quite a bit against us!

12 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

I’m unsure if we should get Buckley but if we do and he gets a flag with us it’ll totally be worth it to see the Filth contorted into squirming, squally rage.

I suppose it would be alright if Collingwood were the team we defeated in the GF. I could probably put up with that.

The only benefit of Buckley expressing some interest is that other coaches will know there is some competition and can't fluff us around and over price themselves.

Otherwise he is still too robotic and doesn't have it in his DNA to build natural connections with players.

Simpson or Longmire for mine

Edited Wednesday at 06:192 days by Demons1858