Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Surely if you’re dropping Lever you throw Petty down back and keep JVR and Jefferson together ? Seems weird. Throwing JVR around like a yo yo between Casey and AFL is no good, especially when you’re asking a key forward to second ruck most of the time then play measly minutes up forward.

Petty not having been omitted in two years despite poor form at times, and consistently getting games over JVR, is clearly Goodwin playing favourites. It's very unfortunate to see Melbourne prioritising a stop-gap forward over someone who has showed significant upside in that same position, and has to balance that as a back-up ruckman playing 65% game time whenever he does get a senior gig.

Edited by burnthefushias

 

Out Lever and STILL NO TMAC.

What a joke. I’m over our selections and goodwins dribble.


GC are a fairly fast paced side so guess we are injecting some pace and giving Jeffo a run. Interestingly we are rated in the top 4 for ball movement from defense into f50 according to AFL. Feel like we are are going in a bit short though, needed another tall on the bench. Will be very interesting, putting a bit on Blake Howes.

Just now, DemonOX said:

Out Lever and STILL NO TMAC.

What a joke. I’m over our selections and goodwins dribble.

For god's sake get over it. TMac is old and slow and by his own admission can't jump. He's also a liability when the ball hits the ground. He can hold down 3rd tall position, but so can others. If May was out, it might be a different story, but Tom is never a replacement for Lever.

It's also important to keep playing the younger players, there's no future whatsoever in playing Tom.

 

1 hour ago, Deespicable said:


Wow, that's a big call on Lever and Windsor, especially given Rivers was the most likely out after being subbed out against Port.
Sounds like Rivers will be sent back to defence in place of Windsor.
I assume T.Mac is back in for Lever and Jeffo in for JVR with Tholstrup in as likely sub - Lindsay back starting.
I especially liked hearing that Goody intimated that Viney may play forward - been calling for that for some time as he actually is a very accurate shot at goal - he just can't hit up targets with ease.



And what benefit would Viney be playing in the forward line, average overhead mark, cannot kick over 45 metres out, not quick on a lead?


13 minutes ago, Billy said:

Agreed but what about Petty?

Where?

If you mean up forward, at the moment it's probably a toss-up between Petty and JVR as to who gets dropped, and presumably the thinking is that JVR will get more out of a run in the two's than Petty. I for one would prefer Petty alongside Jeffo than JVR, Petty is a more physical player.

If you mean Petty down back, fine but a) is he needed (3rd tall?) and b) that leaves JVR and Jeffo forward and see above.

8 minutes ago, DeeZone said:

Will be very interesting, putting a bit on Blake Howes.

Sure, but why not? Isn't this what we're supposed to be doing, exposing the younger players, backing them in to step up?

Not sure how Harry Sharp gets a gig here. He was unsighted at Casey last game.

I assume it's the sub vest again for him on the back of his casual jog v Essendon VFL.

14 minutes ago, Dee-tonator said:

If we somehow get up and win, there will be some red faces on this thread.

Hardly. Season is shot. Harsh calls should have been months ago

Edited by jnrmac

I don't hate the changes.

Would have liked to have seen JvR retain his spot and bring in Jeffo alongside him. It's going to be a big ask for Jeffo to be a solo key forward when presumably Petty goes into the ruck and Gawn is having a spell. JvR must be getting frustrated with being yoyo'd in and out of the team.

Sharp had a poor game in the twos and Tholstrup didn't play after being dropped so finding it strange that they refuse to reward Laurie who's been in the bests nearly every week.

Would have had Laurie and Tholstrup in with Tholstrup as sub.

Alas, hopefully we match their run and provide some good opportunities for our forwards.

A good day of Saturday footy watching regardless. Hopefully.


29 minutes ago, burnthefushias said:

Petty not having been omitted in two years despite poor form at times, and consistently getting games over JVR, is clearly Goodwin playing favourites. It's very unfortunate to see Melbourne prioritising a stop-gap forward over someone who has showed significant upside in that same position, and has to balance that as a back-up ruckman playing 65% game time whenever he does get a senior gig.

I am not a big fan of H. Petty but the decision to drop JVR is way too late. He has become a liability and shows no forward skill at all. Hopefully he will not be recalled.

I would also have dropped Viney - he is out of his depth now and has become a liability.

Lever is overrated these days and it is good to see him out.

We will now get to see what MJ can do and it is not before time.

8 minutes ago, Roger Mellie said:

Not sure how Harry Sharp gets a gig here. He was unsighted at Casey last game.

I assume it's the sub vest again for him on the back of his casual jog v Essendon VFL.

I understand where you are coming from Roger, but he has also played his best games when introduced as sub. Maybe that’s what our MC have in mind.

PS. I know it seems like weird logic, but ………

30 minutes ago, DemonOX said:

Out Lever and STILL NO TMAC.

What a joke. I’m over our selections and goodwins dribble.

Agree - where the hell is TMac? He was one of our best players this season…

24 minutes ago, bing181 said:

For god's sake get over it. TMac is old and slow and by his own admission can't jump. He's also a liability when the ball hits the ground. He can hold down 3rd tall position, but so can others. If May was out, it might be a different story, but Tom is never a replacement for Lever.

It's also important to keep playing the younger players, there's no future whatsoever in playing Tom.

Refer below.

Edited by DemonOX


24 minutes ago, bing181 said:

For god's sake get over it. TMac is old and slow and by his own admission can't jump. He's also a liability when the ball hits the ground. He can hold down 3rd tall position, but so can others. If May was out, it might be a different story, but Tom is never a replacement for Lever.

It's also important to keep playing the younger players, there's no future whatsoever in playing Tom.

He was in good form when he got dropped despite his limitations and should be in the side based on FORM.

Age is just a number.

Seems selection is based on favourites rather than form.

21 hours ago, bing181 said:

If we're going to bring in younger players then Melksham has to stay. He's the forward line's Steven May, marshalling the troops and providing the on-field leadership and guidance that they need.

Quite. And also, can these young player supplant these cheap senior players.

2 minutes ago, DemonOX said:

He was in good form when he got dropped despite his limitations and should be in the side based on FORM.

Age is just a number.

Seems selection is based on favourites rather than form.

It would be interesting to be a fly on the wall during the selection meetings, would be a real eye opener, hopefully not a popularity fest??

 

I'm excited to see how our defensive set up functions with May, Turner and Howes, they might be a little big for us, but I like that we made the call on Lever. I'm not convinced we can play both of May and Lever in the same team. They slow our ball movement down too much and are slow to defend plays now.

At the other end of the ground though is where it's going to be most interesting. Melksham, Jefferson and Petty with Fritta and Kozzy. Petty will, I assume, take second ruck duties.

Having Melksham down there will hopefully give Jefferson some support against the taller interceptor like Andrew, but more likely Collins. So that should allow Jefferson to fly for the ball.

Kozzy needs to go bezerk and Melky and Fritta need to contribute strongly on the scoreboard if we're any chance here.

We need a redemption story with our mids. They were dreadful in the corresponding game earlier in the year, so they need to lock down on Rowell in particular IMO, so I'd be fine with a hard tag there from Viney, and I'd be happy for Oliver to go head to head with Anderson, and for Trac and Kozzy to go against Miller and co.

As is the story most weeks, bring our kicking boots and we're a chance, particularly early in the game, otherwise you can forget it.

51 minutes ago, Deez21 said:

I LOLOLOLOL at the fact the clown thinks he’s made some sort of selection statement by dropping a defender despite defending well (but not dropping the one who had 7 kicked in him) and 2 kids but then keeping Petty in the side

Dropping JVR over Petty shows Goodwin isn’t actually serious with his “selection statements” and hopefully the players see through it as well

Cannot wait for this contract to run down because the damage he does to this footy club in the meantime is going to be irreparable

I truly hate posts like this, but I hope you keep it up, because you know what I don’t hate? I don’t hate the thought of people like you crying into your pillow for at least another year. In fact I love this thought a little bit too much 😂 Goody ain’t going anywhere anytime soon… get used to it.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Like
    • 370 replies
  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 287 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Haha
    • 372 replies