Jump to content

Featured Replies

24 minutes ago, binman said:

What do you mean by his refusal to shift Turner (i assume you mean shift him forward)?

Didn't he do so when Jefferson was taken off?

i think he means that mj was only subbed off sometime in the 3rd and turner was only put down forward late or halfway thru the last, anyways he should have been subbed off at ht

 
1 hour ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Shortly after the team came out from half time and were doing little runs near the Punt Rd end 50m line, McVee was hunched over for about 5 mins throwing up liquid. It was 30 metres in front of us, he didn’t look well at all.

Thanks DZ. It may well have been in the post-half time huddle, so that makes sense. Appreciate the reply.

On 11/05/2025 at 13:26, DemonOX said:

I know he umps stank but bloody hell if we kick straight and play FOUR QUARTERS we win and umps are irrelevant.

The umps didn’t cost us the game we did.

You cannot just explain every loss by us not kicking straight.

The momentum that we have generated in just about every game played this season has the maggot extinguisher stamp on each and everyone of them.

Simply they are cheating and just look for , and almost construct some remote, hardly ever paid free kick.

And they just pull it out of nowhere.

They know who they are and they smile as they do it. Many of which are obviously jaw dropping to both teams, and invariably cause 50 mtr penalties.

 
17 hours ago, bing181 said:

Turner had 11 marks for the day. In the last quarter after he was moved ... 1.

Hawthorn managed 7 goals in 3 quarters with Turner in the back line. And then 6 in a quarter after he was moved.

You don't move players who are winning their positions.

Turner should have been shifted forward in the 2nd quarter when it was obvious we we were winning around the ground but struggling to convert up forward. Despite having a number of set shots we also had a number of inside 50s repelled with Hawks taking easy intercepts which we would have been able to mitigate by moving Turner up forward.

It was blindingly obvious at the ground, had Turner been moved forward earlier we may have been able to convert more opportunities. Conflating Turner's move forward when the game was lost with the Hawks piling on goals in the last quarter is a great example of "correlation ≠ causation".

17 hours ago, bing181 said:

Turner had 11 marks for the day. In the last quarter after he was moved ... 1.

Hawthorn managed 7 goals in 3 quarters with Turner in the back line. And then 6 in a quarter after he was moved.

You don't move players who are winning their positions.

Crikey.

No you leave them exactly where they are and get smashed in the last quarter.

What are you on about? Our three fwds kicked zero goals and you claim you don't move disco there because he was doing well down back.

Yea sure he saved goals but you have to kick them to win games.

Hes been successful playing fwd prior and he is a very reliable shot at goal when experienced players like Fritta were spraying them everywhere.

And just because he only managed one mark in the final while playing forward is a complete non sequitur. The ball was being delivered i50 not as well in the last. We were also running out of fuel. If he was there in the beginning when we were delivering the ball at breakneck speed at times up fwd, it could have been a completely different story. We made Sicily look like a superstar.

Certainly come half time, when your three major fwds have done bumkus, and the game is there for the taking, you make a change. And as a proven successful and accurate fwd , Disco was the obvious and probably only choice given Tmac won't play there.

Just because he was doing well isn't a reason not to move him. On that logic you would only put poor playing players up forward. That's going to just have some more of the same.

Speaking of Bumkus, the word somes up your post beautifully.


I have been away so sorry of this has been dealt with already but did the Hawthorn player get suspended for tripping Pickett in the goal square?

5 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

I have been away so sorry of this has been dealt with already but did the Hawthorn player get suspended for tripping Pickett in the goal square?

No.

7 minutes ago, binman said:

No.

Not even fined? WTF??

 
4 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Not even fined? WTF??

It's like an AFL version of the tree falling in a forest philosophical question.

Does a blatant trip that four umpires did not pay a free kick for and the match review panel doesn't even reference actually happen?

As nuts as the koz non call was, i reckon it pales against thefree paid to siath against fritter.

Perhaps The umpires could argue they didn't pay the trip because for some incredible coincidence all four umpires were unsighted.

But the siath howler was a concious decision to pay a free that was 100% not there.

In fact, more than not being there, Friitter should have got a free as siath dangerously jumped into the pack and got nowhere near the ball.

He did so in such an erratic way that I can only assume the umpire assumed siath must have been pushed. He wasn't.

It was 20 metres from goal and Luke the koz error cost us a certain goal.

THAT is where a umpire not in the immediate zone should come into play - it was clearly a howler, over rule it.


8 minutes ago, binman said:

As nuts as the koz non call was, i reckon it pales against thefree paid to siath against fritter.

Perhaps The umpires could argue they didn't pay the trip because for some incredible coincidence all four umpires were unsighted.

But the siath howler was a concious decision to pay a free that was 100% not there.

In fact, more than not being there, Friitter should have got a free as siath dangerously jumped into the pack and got nowhere near the ball.

He did so in such an erratic way that I can only assume the umpire assumed siath must have been pushed. He wasn't.

It was 20 metres from goal and Luke the koz error cost us a certain goal.

THAT is where a umpire not in the immediate zone should come into play - it was clearly a howler, over rule it.

They’ve admitted they don’t have enough experienced umpires currently. Yet there is still no plant to make them full time professionals even though it’s a professional sport generating millions of dollars. The umpiring is poor, has been for years. They don’t seem to really care.

28 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

They’ve admitted they don’t have enough experienced umpires currently. Yet there is still no plant to make them full time professionals even though it’s a professional sport generating millions of dollars. The umpiring is poor, has been for years. They don’t seem to really care.

Because crud umpiring generates controversy and gets the fans emotional which all leads to interest in the sport. And then they can mysteriously assist some teams.

It is clear from the fixturing, the special games etc etc, that the AFL does not care about building a fair competition but is mainly interested in building an empire.

On the Kozzie trip - OK, maybe 4 umpires didn't see it and they assumed he tripped over his own feet or a paticularly thick blade of grass. But why no review or a dangerous act? Beyond outrageous.

11 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Turner should have been shifted forward in the 2nd quarter when it was obvious we we were winning around the ground but struggling to convert up forward. Despite having a number of set shots we also had a number of inside 50s repelled with Hawks taking easy intercepts which we would have been able to mitigate by moving Turner up forward.

It was blindingly obvious at the ground, had Turner been moved forward earlier we may have been able to convert more opportunities. Conflating Turner's move forward when the game was lost with the Hawks piling on goals in the last quarter is a great example of "correlation ≠ causation".

It really show how desperate and incompetent Goody is

How any body can continue support for this coaches gamelan beggars me

Should have gone end 23 and we would be through our rebuild now

1 hour ago, jnrmac said:

Not even fined? WTF??

#playonhawthorn

52 minutes ago, sue said:

Because crud umpiring generates controversy and gets the fans emotional which all leads to interest in the sport. And then they can mysteriously assist some teams.

It is clear from the fixturing, the special games etc etc, that the AFL does not care about building a fair competition but is mainly interested in building an empire.

On the Kozzie trip - OK, maybe 4 umpires didn't see it and they assumed he tripped over his own feet or a paticularly thick blade of grass. But why no review or a dangerous act? Beyond outrageous.

For me its the reverse.

Umpiring and the MRO and the blatant AFL favouritism over fixtures, TV slots etc etc just kill it for me.

For someone that used to watch 3 or 4 games a week other than Melbourne I basically watch 1 game a month or less of other teams.


38 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

For me its the reverse.

Umpiring and the MRO and the blatant AFL favouritism over fixtures, TV slots etc etc just kill it for me.

For someone that used to watch 3 or 4 games a week other than Melbourne I basically watch 1 game a month or less of other teams.

I feel like that too. But I'm sure the AFL is busy monitoring clicks etc and thinks all PR is good PR, especially easy when it has the so-called footy journos in thrall.

2 hours ago, binman said:

It's like an AFL version of the tree falling in a forest philosophical question.

Does a blatant trip that four umpires did not pay a free kick for and the match review panel doesn't even reference actually happen?

So they 'drop' the closest umpire for what was called as the worst non-call of the season, but somehow the player escapes a fine?

Only rational i can think of is they thought he was 'scrambling' after the collision with team mate and it was accidental. long bow to draw though

1 hour ago, jackaub said:

Should have gone end 23 and we would be through our rebuild now

There is just no reality where a coach 2 years after a flag with 2 subsequent top4 finishes and prelim finals gets sacked.

It just would not have happened under any circumstances and people should let it go.

Whether change is needed now or not it is pure fantasy to think he was ever getting the axe after ‘23.

3 hours ago, binman said:

As nuts as the koz non call was, i reckon it pales against thefree paid to siath against fritter.

Perhaps The umpires could argue they didn't pay the trip because for some incredible coincidence all four umpires were unsighted.

But the siath howler was a concious decision to pay a free that was 100% not there.

In fact, more than not being there, Friitter should have got a free as siath dangerously jumped into the pack and got nowhere near the ball.

He did so in such an erratic way that I can only assume the umpire assumed siath must have been pushed. He wasn't.

It was 20 metres from goal and Luke the koz error cost us a certain goal.

THAT is where a umpire not in the immediate zone should come into play - it was clearly a howler, over rule it.

And then about 30 seconds later Weddle got a free kick for holding the man when he had dropped the footy, the umpiring was infuriating in this game.

LAWS OF AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL 2025

22.2 REPORTABLE OFFENCES

22.2.2 Specific Offences Any of the following types of conduct is a Reportable Offence:

(a) intentionally or carelessly:

....

(xi) tripping another person whether by hand, arm, foot or leg


34 minutes ago, GM11 said:

LAWS OF AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL 2025

22.2 REPORTABLE OFFENCES

22.2.2 Specific Offences Any of the following types of conduct is a Reportable Offence:

(a) intentionally or carelessly:

....

(xi) tripping another person whether by hand, arm, foot or leg

Don't be naive - the laws of Australia Rules Football (incorporated) override those and allow AFL HQ and the MRO to do whatever is currently on their empire building agenda.

5 hours ago, jnrmac said:

I have been away so sorry of this has been dealt with already but did the Hawthorn player get suspended for tripping Pickett in the goal square?

A player hasn't been suspended for years for a tripping offence.

 
3 hours ago, jnrmac said:

For me its the reverse.

Umpiring and the MRO and the blatant AFL favouritism over fixtures, TV slots etc etc just kill it for me.

For someone that used to watch 3 or 4 games a week other than Melbourne I basically watch 1 game a month or less of other teams.

It's not an even competition anymore. The same teams benefit from fixturing and TV which = more $$$$$ = better facilities = destination club = always good.

45 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

A player hasn't been suspended for years for a tripping offence.

Not true, eg. Keane from Adeliade in 2021. And lots of fines have been made, up to $10K, including this year.

Most trips are accidental and not very careless, so the MRO is understandably reluctant to suspend for them. But Kozzie had a clear deliberate trip. Not saying it was done with evil intention (ie to hurt Kozzie), but please explain how it wasn't at the very least a fine and basically ignored. What does it say about the AFL?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 287 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 372 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 33 replies