Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 19/02/2025 at 17:01, Redleg said:

I am still in favour of moving Kentfield to the inactive list and taking Jai or Roy, probably Jai.

Kentfield will not play for quite a while and certainly not at AFL level this year.

Take the pressure off him and let him train and be with the boys, knowing while he is not ready, he isn’t keeping another player off the list.

When ready, he can play at Casey or a lower competition, for the few games left in the season.

I think we will lose Jai in the msd, if we don’t take him now.

Do you actually know Kentfields progression? I find it ridiculous that people are talking about putting someone on an inactive list when you actually have no insights as to when he will be back.  You don’t put someone on based on the face you think they will play reserves 

 
31 minutes ago, Supreme_Demon said:

It definitely pushes a strong case to increase AFL playing lists.

Yes, or a proper reserves / second tier with deeper squads, or if not a practice squad concept with an inactive list (like NFL). 

Think of WCE last year for example. Not a fun environment to train in when you’re struggling to get 24 together 

 
1 hour ago, Gawn's Beard said:

Yes, or a proper reserves / second tier with deeper squads, or if not a practice squad concept with an inactive list (like NFL). 

Think of WCE last year for example. Not a fun environment to train in when you’re struggling to get 24 together 

Agreed.

Not sure on the exact amount.

But at least 5 or 6 extra list spots for each AFL team should be enough to cover a dearth of players that succumb to injuries?

Bring back each VFL side having a reserves side too.

The AFL with it's enormous profits should be putting more money into the secondary competitions like the VFL as well as grassroots football regardless.

I maintain that there’s absolutely no need to have deadlines for replacing injured players, particularly before the season has even started. If we lose another player next week we’ll be 2 down before round 1. This is supposed to be the premier comp in the land. Time for change


2 hours ago, Demons11 said:

Do you actually know Kentfields progression? I find it ridiculous that people are talking about putting someone on an inactive list when you actually have no insights as to when he will be back.  You don’t put someone on based on the face you think they will play reserves 

Kentfield told GW he would be out for a long time. He is getting over a potential life threatening illness. Is that a good enough insight, straight from the horses mouth.

I am unsure if he will play Reserves this year, but I know he won’t play AFL this year.

It would have taken the pressure off him too, which would help him.

We now have a few out for the year and several on long term injuries. 

I would definitely ask the AFL to replace AMW.

 

Edited by Redleg

5 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Kentfield told GW he would be out for a long time. Is that a good enough insight, straight from the horses mouth.

I am unsure if he will play Reserves this year, but I know he won’t play AFL this year.

It would have taken the pressure off him too, which would help him.

We now have a few out for the year and several on long term injuries.

 

No offence to the kid but what’s his chance of ever playing an AFL game? It’s a brutal profession and sometimes I think we aren’t brutal enough but that’s a hunch without strong factual evidence. 

2 hours ago, Roost it far said:

No offence to the kid but what’s his chance of ever playing an AFL game? It’s a brutal profession and sometimes I think we aren’t brutal enough but that’s a hunch without strong factual evidence. 

That is going too far, because we simply don’t know.

He may develop or he may not, but he hasn’t had the chance to do that yet.

He deserves his chance and he will get it and good luck to him.

 
9 hours ago, Redleg said:

Kentfield told GW he would be out for a long time. He is getting over a potential life threatening illness. Is that a good enough insight, straight from the horses mouth.

I am unsure if he will play Reserves this year, but I know he won’t play AFL this year.

It would have taken the pressure off him too, which would help him.

We now have a few out for the year and several on long term injuries. 

I would definitely ask the AFL to replace AMW.

 

Definitely with you for asking for a replacement for AMW.

I think this will be ticked off, if I remember correctly I think there were a couple of instances last year 

The only reason we have a small chance of potentially being granted exemption to get a replacement player in is because Carlton are trying to do the same. If it was just us, no chance but them? They usually get their way. 


13 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

I don’t think any club will be granted an exemption 

the afl will adjust time of ssp in 2026 and beyond 

I don’t think so either but the way 14 other teams had the chance to sign players before their match simulations whereas Carlton, St Kilda, Melbourne and North didn’t makes at the very least an argument/case for a player to be signed. Because it’s not *fair* that those clubs could play their practice matches. 

If the AFL do the right thing who's getting the list spot? Culley, George or another smokey? 

Edited by Roost it far

16 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Tom Morris on SEN just suggested that the AFL might be open to extending this year’s deadline.

 

Thanks Carlton…


8 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

Thanks Carlton…

It's an interesting one, I know there have been a few injuries so we'll see what happens. 

Whilst we would benefit if they did extend this year (which i'm doubtul) it would make me feel a little annoyed especially if you compare this year to last year

Carlton lose Pick 3, a raw skinny kid and might be able tor replace him compared to us last year we lost Gus a 150+ game premiership player and couldn't do anything until midseason.  Guess we don't have big boy bargaining power though.

 

The AFL website says that extensions (to SSP signings) have been made in the past to allow a club to watch a potential recruit run around 'in competition'. 

Had we played our match a few days earlier, we'd have access to another SSP signing. Same for the Blues.

An aside: handy having the Blues in our corner.

As the saying goes "the squeaky wheel gets the grease".

If both Carlton and Melbourne complain about their circumstances regarding the SSP period then the AFL might be magnanimous and extend it for another week or two.

I think it's fair to do this.

While I understand it may stuff up teams in the second tier competitions (VFL, SANFL, WAFL etc) there are always young blokes out there who would love a chance to play footy at a higher level.

Let's hope the AFL sees sense to make a change.

Edited by Supreme_Demon


Poor Andy 😢 let’s hope common sense prevails and us and Carlton can receive an exemption to the current SSP deadline 

If that’s the case, I wonder if it’s as simple as adding Culley to the list? He’s too good to not be on an AFL list and has some upside at only 21(?) years old 

 
5 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

I don’t think any club will be granted an exemption 

the afl will adjust time of ssp in 2026 and beyond 

We are talking about a 3-4 day extension and given a big club is in the same boat and the situation is patently and obviously unequal, I think we are a real chance to grab a replacement.

As I said in an earlier post, don’t ask don’t get.

Edited by Redleg

Jay Clark is now reporting that the AFL will open up the SSP period for this week so Melbourne and Carlton can sign replacement players.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Sydney

    A few weeks ago, I visited a fellow Melbourne Football Club supporter in hospital, and our conversation inevitably shifted from his health diagnosis to the well-being of our football team. Like him, Melbourne had faced challenges in recent months, but an intervention - in his case, surgery, and in the team's case, a change in game style - had brought about much improvement.  The team's professionals had altered its game style from a pedestrian and slow-moving approach, which yielded an average of merely 60 points for five winless games, to a faster and more direct style. This shift led to three consecutive wins and a strong competitive effort in the fourth game, albeit with a tired finish against Hawthorn, a strong premiership contender.  As we discussed our team's recent health improvement, I shared my observations on the changes within the team, including the refreshed style, the introduction of new young talent, such as rising stars Caleb Windsor, Harvey Langford, and Xavier Lindsay, and the rebranding of Kozzy Pickett from a small forward to a midfield machine who can still get among the goals. I also highlighted the dominance of captain Max Gawn in the ruck and the resurgence in form in a big way of midfield superstars Christian Petracca and Clayton Oliver. 

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 9 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Sydney

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 26th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a crushing victory by the Demons over the Swans at the G. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 45 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Sydney

    The Demons controlled the contest from the outset, though inaccurate kicking kept the Swans in the game until half time. But after the break, Melbourne put on the jets and blew Sydney away and the demolition job was complete.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 425 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Sydney

    Max Gawn still has an almost unassailable lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award. Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Harvey Langford, Kade Chandler & Ed Langdon round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 44 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Northern Bullants

    The Casey Demons travelled to a windy Cramer Street, Preston yesterday and blew the Northern Bullants off the ground for three quarters before shutting up shop in the final term, coasting to a much-needed 71-point victory after leading by almost 15 goals at one stage. It was a pleasing performance that revived the Demons’ prospects for the 2025 season but, at the same time, very little can be taken from the game because of the weak opposition. These days, the Bullants are little more than road kill. The once proud club, situated behind the Preston Market in a now culturally diverse area, is currently facing significant financial and on-field challenges, having failed to secure a win to date in 2025.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Sydney

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons have a golden opportunity to build on last week’s stirring win by toppling Sydney at the MCG. A victory today would keep them firmly in the hunt for a finals spot and help them stay in touch with the pack chasing a place in the Top 8. Can the Dees make it two in a row and bring down the Swans?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 643 replies
    Demonland