Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, The Taciturn Demon said:

What was that?

The first time in the NT was bewildering. This time it was just pathetic. 

Sorry, but Petracca and Gawn can't fix that garbage. 

 

And we don’t have Gus anymore.

 

Time to blood some of the VFL players. We will not make the finals and if by miracle we do, we don't have what it takes at the moment. 

That was an obliteration in the coaches box and I can't get over the arrogance of the coaching staff to not play a ruckman. It couldn't have been much worse than it was today to play Fullarton and it would've allowed JVR to stay forward where he needs to be.

The genius question thread from the past week has just been answered emphatically.

Edited by Heart Beats True

1 minute ago, wizardinoz said:

And how did that work for us today, Simon?  Fullerton left out and we got destroyed in the ruck. Why draft the bloke if you aren’t going to play him? 

As if Fullarton would have made a 10 goal difference. Even Gawn wouldn’t have made that much of a difference and he’s the best ruckman this decade. 

Edited by Jaded No More

 

Nothing short of insipid. Second to every ball, -32 in clearances, -36 in contested ball, -29 in uncontested.

We sucked.

So there were no surprises. Freo played exactly as we knew they'd play. 

We knew Brayshaw and Serong would get leather poisoning

But we tried to play our way?

Pressure marginally better than Alice but a shut show


Does anyone know how many goals they got over the back? It must’ve been a record.

I genuinely want to understand the reason why but assume no one will ask in the presser.

Having 0 clearances in a quarter is also surely a record.

Let down by 3 of our highest paid players first thing Clarrie (first half), Lever and Kossie need to do is put their hands up and admit their effort and accountability was nowhere near the required level today.

Freo were bigger stronger and faster than us, they have shown up our weaknesses twice in the last 6-8 weeks. We couldn’t get our hands on in the centre. They know how to play us.

 
Just now, Melb16 said:

Does anyone know how many goals they got over the back? It must’ve been a record.

I genuinely want to understand the reason why but assume no one will ask in the presser.

Having 0 clearances in a quarter is also surely a record.

We played a high press game and were let down several times with poor skill on basic disposals which with everyone moving forward killed us on the rebound 

 Lost clearances 47-15 

Hitouts 47-9 

Sparrow. Effort. Slow or weak. 💩💩Fritsch. Weak today. 💩💩
Lever. Embarrassing all day. 💩💩

Tackling.  All day.  Allowing Freo to get handballs away. 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩

Gave up 13 goals from turnovers.  
Gave up 5 goals out the back and to the goalsquare. Goodwin !!!!💩💩

Rinse and repeat.  Its stoppage spread goal 💩💩💩💩

All day. Tackle. Tackle. Brace for contact. Handball away. Handball away. 💩💩can’t stop the run and spread. 


Outclassed is right. Freo played like a premiership contender and we're just a long way off. How on earth did we concede that many goals out the back? Madness.

We had 4 jobs to do today & failed 

1. Win

2. Get back in the 8

3. Knock essendon out of the 8

4. Get 2 games clear of Collingwood 

Was Lever Fremantle's biggest asset?

Was Fritsch told "always jog, never run?"

Was Pickett there as an official observer?

Is Sparrow the slowest midfielder in the AFL?

Does Goodwin actually think Petty is an adequate ruckman?

Is Oliver still worth his enormous contract?

And is anyone taking responsibility for the fact that the cupboard at Casey is bare?

We got belted, yeah, but I didn't think we were deplorable. Having no ruck killed us and our mids weren't able to win clearance to make up for it. From there our defenders were hammered and our forwards couldn't get near it. We had patches where we kicked some consecutive goals but never really threatened.

Probably lucky not to lose by more to be honest but I didn't think it was through lack of effort, we were just outplayed/outclassed. Freo are a decent side who seem to have put it together after a few years of threatening and are printed to make a run for the flag. Today just showed we are more of a 6-10th side at the moment rather than a top 4 team.

2 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

As if Fullarton would have made a 10 goal difference. Even Gawn wouldn’t have made that much of a difference and he’s the best ruckman this decade. 

At least he may have offered us more than Petty in hitouts to advantage.  You have to at least try something and give the kid a go.


So much for the 'dynasty'.

Fancy wooing Grundy by claiming we see 4 flags ahead. Guzzled our own bathwater

4 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

We pretty much knew that Jacko and Biff were going to dominate in the air but our lack of intensity and spread from the contest was really disappointing. Leb and Knuckle were good I thought. The commentary team were gushing about Freo for much of the game but when it really matters they are as flakey as any side. 

If Freo base their hope of finals success on the two games against us, they'll have a very harsh reality check in the finals.

Just now, wizardinoz said:

At least he may have offered us more than Petty in hitouts to advantage.  You have to at least try something and give the kid a go.

Petty has lost all the mongrel he showed when playing in the backline.

He is just not the same physical guy anymore, very meek and non competitive.

1 minute ago, wizardinoz said:

At least he may have offered us more than Petty in hitouts to advantage.  You have to at least try something and give the kid a go.

From all reports he struggles to win a ruck contest at Casey. Not sure he would have won many against Darcy and Jackson. 


The best ruck combo in the game and the best midfield trio in the game in my view.

Against no recognised ruck, Viney trying his best, a fat unfit Oliver and River learning the mid trade without a mid engine. 

Surely nothing could go wrong. 

Yet we played a high defensive press and our forwards when we got the ball down there let them waltz it out on most occasions.

Completely outcoached, outplayed, outworked.

 Lucky the damage was not worse. 

The clearance count lost us the game, the score from turnover count made it a mauling. 

3 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

From all reports he struggles to win a ruck contest at Casey. Not sure he would have won many against Darcy and Jackson. 

Then why take him over with the team to WA? We had nothing to lose by playing him.

 

Nice load of tripe served up yet again against a WA team.

Can't wait to drop Sparrow.

Gives so little every week.

Quite a few no shows from some senior players.

Finals look wobbly again.

Weak effort today.

 

2 minutes ago, wizardinoz said:

Then why take him over with the team to WA? We had nothing to lose by playing him.

Presumably if jvr or petty got injured pre game 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 215 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies