Jump to content

Featured Replies

Just now, Little Goffy said:

Is it too late to amicably and mutually end his contract and allow him to move as he free agent? 

Geelong would love it because they wouldn't have to give up anything, and based on the compensation for Josh Battle we would be awarded more draft picks than Tasmania.

This would be a decent outcome for all 3 parties.

 
1 minute ago, Little Goffy said:

Is it too late to amicably and mutually end his contract and allow him to move as he free agent? 

Geelong would love it because they wouldn't have to give up anything, and based on the compensation for Josh Battle we would be awarded more draft picks than Tasmania.

That's not how free agency works. You can't just kill a contract because the compo will be better than the trade.

5 minutes ago, rufus said:

We're a joke if we are prepared to be paying over half a million bucks for a bloke to play in Geeling every year till 2030. Not going to happen surely.

The first thing that needs to be covered off in any potential deal is to get rid of the salary. It'll be one thing to front the members and explain how our player management has seen the departure of popular players, but to also expect members to cop the idea that we'll be paying for the privilege of seeing them play somewhere else is a bridge too far.

So we are happy to take back a future 1st and 2nd then?

No harm in asking about SDK who clearly is not in the good books at Geelong

 

You don't sell a late model Ferrari for 5K on eBay. Even if it was in an accident and needs repairs.
We need to be properly compensated.
A future 1st (probably pick 14 to 18) is an insult. If he were a free agent this year we would most likely get pick 6 in compensation. That's a starting point. If Geelong want him they need to get busy. We shouldn't accept anything less than 2 early first rounders for arguably the greatest ever Demon.

Let's hope Geelong don't ask for a roadworthy.

Just now, SthSea22 said:

So we are happy to take back a future 1st and 2nd then?

No harm in asking about SDK who clearly is not in the good books at Geelong

My own personal view (not knowing what disruption, if any, this player actually causes behind the scenes for our club) is no, we shouldn't accept that deal regardless of the full salary being paid. I'd rather spend a season letting him play the role he is best at and hopefully dominating so that worst case if he still wants to go in 12 months we might actually have some interested parties with some currency.

The idea of trading an asset when it is at it's lowest value just makes no sense.


1 minute ago, Jack Vineys Anger Manager said:

You don't sell a late model Ferrari for 5K on eBay. Even if it was in an accident and needs repairs.
We need to be properly compensated.
A future 1st (probably pick 14 to 18) is an insult. If he were a free agent this year we would most likely get pick 6 in compensation. That's a starting point. If Geelong want him they need to get busy. We shouldn't accept anything less than 2 early first rounders for arguably the greatest ever Demon.

Hear bloody hear. 

1 minute ago, Jack Vineys Anger Manager said:

You don't sell a late model Ferrari for 5K on eBay. Even if it was in an accident and needs repairs.
We need to be properly compensated.
A future 1st (probably pick 14 to 18) is an insult. If he were a free agent this year we would most likely get pick 6 in compensation. That's a starting point. If Geelong want him they need to get busy. We shouldn't accept anything less than 2 early first rounders for arguably the greatest ever Demon.

Let's hope Geelong don't ask for a roadworthy.

Agreed. Time for this club to show some stones.

8 minutes ago, Katrina Dee Fan said:

Well put.  Clarry even said in that podcast last week, "the media are full of [censored]".  Just like his mum did last night on Facebook.

"The media are full of [censored]" could refer to anything. He could be talking about his reported off-field indiscretions, missed appointments, meetings with Geelong officials and players, etc. Why didn't he just come out and say which media reports were incorrect?

We all know the reason why he didn't.

 
6 minutes ago, Jack Vineys Anger Manager said:

You don't sell a late model Ferrari for 5K on eBay. Even if it was in an accident and needs repairs.
We need to be properly compensated.
A future 1st (probably pick 14 to 18) is an insult. If he were a free agent this year we would most likely get pick 6 in compensation. That's a starting point. If Geelong want him they need to get busy. We shouldn't accept anything less than 2 early first rounders for arguably the greatest ever Demon.

Let's hope Geelong don't ask for a roadworthy.

The last line of your post is the trick isn't it.

17 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

You're not on the club payroll.

Therefore you’re equal to any Joe Blow that supports this footy club. Expecting senior management officials to treat you any different is just an imagination in your mind.

No, I'm not.  But then neither are the board.  They're volunteer roles.


16 minutes ago, Jack Vineys Anger Manager said:

You don't sell a late model Ferrari for 5K on eBay. Even if it was in an accident and needs repairs.
We need to be properly compensated.
A future 1st (probably pick 14 to 18) is an insult. If he were a free agent this year we would most likely get pick 6 in compensation. That's a starting point. If Geelong want him they need to get busy. We shouldn't accept anything less than 2 early first rounders for arguably the greatest ever Demon.

Let's hope Geelong don't ask for a roadworthy.

We had a Ferrari; it’s since been treated like a lawnmower. 

6 minutes ago, Katrina Dee Fan said:

No, I'm not.  But then neither are the board.  They're volunteer roles.

Jeez dazzle where is all this anger coming from, everyone has a right to their opinions even those that I fervently disagree with.

Just now, DeeZone said:

Jeez dazzle where is all this anger coming from, everyone has a right to their opinions even those that I fervently disagree with.

He's still angry I pulled him up for his treatment of WCW, so I'm now his new target.  

If Clarrie goes this will all be on him

We haven't mistreated him and we've been extremely patient 

And we've given the bloke any number of chances to mend his ways

Sometimes people just go rogue and you have to part company

It's really nothing personal unless you want to hang on to how great a player he has been.  And that's hard to let go of

I hope he stays and gets his best footy back but if not, I wish him well


4 minutes ago, BLWNBA said:

We had a Ferrari; it’s since been treated like a lawnmower. 

A bloody good lawnmower if you don’t mind BLW… 11 wins, 4 losses by under a goal and played the last couple with 8-10 not available. But go ahead with the demolishing of our club.!!

If he actually goes there sure is a massive hole in our salary Cap. Grundy, Gus and clarry out. Billings and Campbell in. 

3 minutes ago, DeeZone said:

Jeez dazzle where is all this anger coming from, everyone has a right to their opinions even those that I fervently disagree with.

No anger from my end lol. Don't just presume things just future reference also.

1 minute ago, Katrina Dee Fan said:

He's still angry I pulled him up for his treatment of WCW, so I'm now his new target.  

Hahahahahah! Pulled me up on what? I've already forgotten what you even said, that's how irrelevant it was to me

2 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

No anger from my end lol. Don't just presume things just future reference also.

Hahahahahah! Pulled me up on what? I've already forgotten what you even said, that's how irrelevant it was to me

Yeah, right, that's why your engagement with my posts have exploded in the last 24 hours.

Interesting you advise someone else here not to presume things when you presumed what my level of involvement is in the club.  How very hypocritical.

Edited by Katrina Dee Fan

1 minute ago, DeeZone said:

A bloody good lawnmower if you don’t mind BLW… 11 wins, 4 losses by under a goal and played the last couple with 8-10 not available. But go ahead with the demolishing of our club.!!

1) That’s irrelevant to the point made by both myself and the OP that was quoted. 
 

2) I’m surprised you didn’t find a way to also throw Maynard in there.

 

But don’t worry mate, victim status and the shortcomings of the MFC will always be welcomed by the majority of those on Demonland. You’ll get your likes. 


8 minutes ago, DeeZone said:

A bloody good lawnmower if you don’t mind BLW… 11 wins, 4 losses by under a goal and played the last couple with 8-10 not available. But go ahead with the demolishing of our club.!!

Try to ignore the trolls mate. 

5 minutes ago, FreedFromDesire said:

 

I don't believe the club will allow him to be traded though.

Ok, in my opinion, he hadn't been mistreated

Oliver is under contract.  You just don’t sign a contract and decide the fresh air & farm life is appealing.  If there’s no great offer in a trade, then enforce the NOT TO BE TRADED message.
 

The media loves the drama and hearsay. 

 
48 minutes ago, Little Goffy said:

Is it too late to amicably and mutually end his contract and allow him to move as he free agent? 

Geelong would love it because they wouldn't have to give up anything, and based on the compensation for Josh Battle we would be awarded more draft picks than Tasmania.

So we have 122 pages on Clarry leaving based mainly on info by media people at 3AW ..even Tom Morris had dropped off. I’m tipping next Thursday the posting on this will drop significantly..


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 314 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies