Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Really? Wow! Where did you hear that?

PS guesse what - we won that game. We beat Adelaide who were 6-1 (and went on to finish top and be favourites in the GF), whilst we were 3-4.

Nathan Brown stated this when he was doing his Sportsbet ad. during tonight’s 360.

 
2 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Sorry LFS, I don’t know which gate you enter for the captain’s run. I can find out tomorrow morning though, then I’ll post on here

Enjoy drinks at the German Club! There are some DA members who’ll be there but the majority will be at the Pineapple Hotel. 

Thanks, worse case we just keep walking till one is open!

Pineapple will be Friday night!

8 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

 

The longest odds since the 13th of May 2017. 

And we won by 40 points!

 
33 minutes ago, praha said:

And we won by 40 points!

After trailing 42-14 18 mins into the second quarter.

9 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

 

The longest odds since the 13th of May 2017. 

Maybe it's a sign that we've been a pretty good football team for a while? 🤪


22 minutes ago, layzie said:

Maybe it's a sign that we've been a pretty good football team for a while? 🤪

You BET we are! See what I did there? 😎 More than seven years of odds under $5 says we’re a bloody good football team. ❤️💙

8 hours ago, Left Foot Snap said:

Thanks, worse case we just keep walking till one is open!

Pineapple will be Friday night!

No need to circumnavigate the ‘Gabba, Leftie.

Entry is through Gate 2.

Gate 2 opens at 3pm

Short session 3:30 - 4:15pm

I’ll see you at the Pineapple! I’ll be the one in red and blue (cheer squad joke, we find it funny even if no one else does). 😜

Edited by WalkingCivilWar

 
3 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

OF COURSE he won’t come back through the reserves. 🙄

29 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

OF COURSE he won’t come back through the reserves. 🙄

like most good teams, bears don't bring their best players back thru the vfl


11 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

like most good teams, bears don't bring their best players back thru the vfl

Well I hope we do the same with Melks. 

8 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

it will be interesting to see how we handle his return

He trains fully. Has been for a while now. I’ll be shocked and disappointed if they make him come back through Casey. 

On 25/06/2024 at 19:00, Jjrogan said:

Sparrow to Neale. Neale earns his possessions at stoppages and in and under.  Need a bigger body. 

ANB to the Luggage. We need a runner who can keep up and close down his easy kicks. 

Can't let these guys get 30 each.  They generate too much momentum 

 

AnB has to go to Zorko. Brisbane were struggling badly when Coleman went down and it was only when Zorko went to half back that they’ve got their game back. If we can shut him down, then that will go a long way to winning the game.


Dees the line at 30.5 is very good value.

With Lever back and our game plan having a significant shift back to our old style it won’t be a blowout. 50% of the possessions on Saturday night were contested compared to a 37% season average. We only took 72 marks (well below our average) and we kicked long out of defence instead of trying to switch with short kicks. I can’t see Brisbane putting on a massive score. We’ll squeeze them wide and I expect Lever and May to have a lot of intercept marks.

45 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

He trains fully. Has been for a while now. I’ll be shocked and disappointed if they make him come back through Casey. 

Melksham isn't part of the future. If we're not playing finals, he shouldn't be playing at AFL level again (other than a farewell game if he wants one). 

Brisbane's last three scores for. 

152 points against Port. 126 points against St Kilda. 114 against the Dogs

We managed 70 against North Melbourne. I'll repeat. 70. With no goals in the last quarter. The team in the bottom of the ladder. 

Offensively, we are no match and the Midfield comparison is terrifying. 

Brisbane put on 55 points from scores from stoppage for the first three quarters against Port. They won clearance by 15 and won the inside 50's 71-46. All of this at Port Adelaide. 

Brisbane's DNA hasn't changed, they're a stoppage, clearance and contested machine of a midfield with one of the most potent, dangerous and dynamic forward-lines in the AFL which is humming atm.

Our numbers? 

We are -4 in contested ball against sides this year. 

We are the 4th worst clearance side in the comp. 

We're the 3rd worst team in the comp in scoring on turnover. 

It's mind-boggling that some think we're in with a chance against this side on current form. If we get within 35 points, I'll be astonished. 

But this could be an easy 50+ loss and that is the more likely scenario. 

12 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

 

The longest odds since the 13th of May 2017. 

This game will represent the 1st time I have tipped against the Dees in 3 years.

7 minutes ago, poita said:

Melksham isn't part of the future. If we're not playing finals, he shouldn't be playing at AFL level again (other than a farewell game if he wants one). 

He told you this? Coz if he did, he lied to one of us, and I’m quite sure it wasn’t me.

”… a farewell game if he wants one.” Could you possibly be more patronising??? 


5 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

This game will represent the 1st time I have tipped against the Dees in 3 years.

With respect, I sincerely hope we mess up your tips this week ❤️💙

7 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

He told you this? Coz if he did, he lied to one of us, and I’m quite sure it wasn’t me.

”… a farewell game if he wants one.” Could you possibly be more patronising??? 

Wouldn't bother responding to him/her.... probably the most negative poster on here, which is saying something given the stuff you see!

2 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

Wouldn't bother responding to him/her.... probably the most negative poster on here, which is saying something given the stuff you see!

Thanks and you’re right. I’m trying hard but still haven’t learned to not bite. Dude played the bag Melks card and I took the bait. My bad 😭

 
28 minutes ago, poita said:

Melksham isn't part of the future. If we're not playing finals, he shouldn't be playing at AFL level again (other than a farewell game if he wants one). 

So you are 100% sure he will not be on our list next year.  
I just think he might be.  Had a year of complete non contact,  his body will go at least one more full year.

and our Forward line is much better with him there, playing well of course, 

hard game against Brisbane !

FWIW Melskham should be a lock in the side after 1-2 games in the VFL provided he has adequate AFL standard fitness. I don't care if he's 35 or whatever, the club still needs to put out a competitive product week to week, and Melk will surely assist here.

Our forward line is crying out for natural forwards. With all due respect to Petty and Turner, they are not natural forwards while our most natural forward is way off the boil atm. Hence we're battling to kick 70 points against the Norths and West Coasts of the league.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 170 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
    • 46 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 328 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies