Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
Votes
Player (Club)
10 Christian Petracca (MELB)
5 Judd McVee (MELB)
5 Jake Soligo (ADEL)
4 Max Gawn (MELB)
3 Jake Lever (MELB)
3 Steven May (MELB)
 

Leaderboard

Interim leaderboard due to byes
Votes Player Club
41 Isaac Heeney SYD
25 Christian Petracca MELB
24 Tom Green GWS
24 Connor Rozee PORT
23 Harry McKay CARL
21 Max Gawn MELB
21 Caleb Serong FRE
20 Errol Gulden SYD
19 Zak Butters PORT
19 Matt Rowell GCFC
18 Shai Bolton RICH
17 Gryan Miers GEEL
17 Lachie Neale BL
16 Luke Jackson FRE
15 Marcus Bontempelli WB
15 Jesse Hogan GWS
15 Jack Steele STK
14 Sam Taylor GWS
14 Nick Vlastuin RICH
14 Hayden Young FRE
 

Heeney will come back to the field once he attracts some defensive attention. Most clubs have let him run free as he has been less damaging and not living up to his potential. Still a very good player, but we have seen this type of form in the past where it ends up dropping away. 

 

I like the coaches award. Most accurate award in my books. AFLPA MVP is garbage. Brownlow is worse.

It’s interesting that of the top 25 we are only represented by 2 players. Over the past few seasons we have been well over-represented. This year I think it’s reflective of a more evenly distributed team effort.


2 minutes ago, JJJ said:

I like the coaches award. Most accurate award in my books. AFLPA MVP is garbage. Brownlow is worse.

It’s interesting that of the top 25 we are only represented by 2 players. Over the past few seasons we have been well over-represented. This year I think it’s reflective of a more evenly distributed team effort.

Agree with your assessment of most accurate. AFLPA MVP is a worthless popularity contest, Brownlow is a biased AF midfielders award.

6 minutes ago, JJJ said:

I like the coaches award. Most accurate award in my books. AFLPA MVP is garbage. Brownlow is worse.

It’s interesting that of the top 25 we are only represented by 2 players. Over the past few seasons we have been well over-represented. This year I think it’s reflective of a more evenly distributed team effort.

Its seems as though most sides have only 2 club representatives at this stage. Getting 3-4 players on the leaderboard is more the exception than the norm, although Oliver, Viney and May are likely to be only one solid game from coming onto the board. 

Trac 5 x 2

McVee and Soligo - either 4 & 1, 3& 2

Max 4

Lever & May either 3, 2&1

 
1 hour ago, chook fowler said:

Max is heading towards AA number 7 - remarkable

He's a marvel, isn't he? 

1 hour ago, chook fowler said:

Max is heading towards AA number 7 - remarkable

I reckon Jackson will be his only challenger. although that said, when D'Arcy is fit again Jackson will likely be moved forward.


2 hours ago, JJJ said:

I like the coaches award. Most accurate award in my books. AFLPA MVP is garbage. Brownlow is worse.

It’s interesting that of the top 25 we are only represented by 2 players. Over the past few seasons we have been well over-represented. This year I think it’s reflective of a more evenly distributed team effort.

I think Clarry will come home with a tailwind, feel like we’ll end with 3 in the top 15

1 hour ago, Swooper1987 said:

He's a marvel, isn't he? 

I went to Sunday morning training session.I have been to a few sessions over the pre-season, but this time l when Max came onto the field, l couldn’t believe how big he is.Not just tall but his overall body size. What a magnificent specimen.

9 minutes ago, Dingo said:

I went to Sunday morning training session.I have been to a few sessions over the pre-season, but this time l when Max came onto the field, l couldn’t believe how big he is.Not just tall but his overall body size. What a magnificent specimen.

my wife and son saw him at the local cannings

they had the same reaction - "he's HUGE"

disappointingly, they reported that george in his arms looks like a normal sized child for his age...disappointing

2 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

my wife and son saw him at the local cannings

they had the same reaction - "he's HUGE"

disappointingly, they reported that george in his arms looks like a normal sized child for his age...disappointing

Max was relatively normal sized until a significant growth spurt in his later teens.  Don't give up on young George just yet 😃

Coaches Votes for Melbourne players, 2024

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_stats.html

  Votes Matches
Polled
Matches
Christian Petracca 25 3 5
Max Gawn 21 4 5
Alex Neal-Bullen 12 2 5
Steven May 10 2 4
Clayton Oliver 9 1 5
Bayley Fritsch 8 1 5
Jack Viney 5 1 5
Judd McVee 5 1 5
Kysaiah Pickett 4 1 4
Jake Lever 3 1 5
Kade Chandler 2 1 5
Jack Billings 1 1 5
Trent Rivers 1 1 5

Round-by-round votes

  Votes 0 1 2 3 4
Christian Petracca 25 5 10 10
Max Gawn 21 7 2 8 4
Alex Neal-Bullen 12 4 8
Steven May 10 7   3
Clayton Oliver 9 9
Bayley Fritsch 8 8
Jack Viney 5 5
Judd McVee 5 5
Kysaiah Pickett 4   4
Jake Lever 3 3
Kade Chandler 2 2
Jack Billings 1 1
Trent Rivers 1 1

37 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

 

disappointingly, they reported that george in his arms looks like a normal sized child for his age...disappointing

Do they know how old George is? 
He appears the same size as Lever’s son who is a good two years older. 
That kid is gonna be a giant. Fear not. 

5 hours ago, Jontee said:

Trac 5 x 2

McVee and Soligo - either 4 & 1, 3& 2

Max 4

Lever & May either 3, 2&1

or Trac 5 x 2

McVee and Soligo both 4/1 

Lever 3

May 3

Gawn 2 and 2

 

 

6 hours ago, Jontee said:

Trac 5 x 2

McVee and Soligo - either 4 & 1, 3& 2

Max 4

Lever & May either 3, 2&1

Imagine how Soligo would have gone had Kozzie not had such a medium impact on him 😮

9 hours ago, Swooper1987 said:

or Trac 5 x 2

McVee and Soligo both 4/1 

Lever 3

May 3

Gawn 2 and 2

 

 

I reckon that might be closer to it as how could both coaches not vote for Max

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 18 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies