Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
5 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

 

Meanwhile...

Toby Green had a player in an arm lock by the throat and was using that lock to drag and twist the player around after play had clearly stopped.

So for me the real story here is the verification that the 'Toby Greene good guy transformation' is a full whitewash.

 

Spot on.

Toby whilst being an amazing footballer is a thug. I don't buy this whitewashing of him for a second.

 
20 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

3000 dollars isn't much in the scheme of things.

I get that suspension in the finals is a double whammy but eye gouging is a serious thing.

Hard to determine if intentional but nonetheless he was found guilty.

Greene copped a week for the same thing a while ago.

Didn't think there was too much in it and while I'd normally defend Toby here, he did the same action two weeks in a row and was suspended after the second. The fine seems sensible.


18 minutes ago, YearOfTheDees said:

 

Well done GWS a joke of a suspension. 

I would guess that the grounds of Appeal are:

first, that the finding was against the weight of the evidence,

second, that the Tribunal misdirected itself, in deciding that if force was not negligible, it must be forceful, without any guidance as to what constituted either category,

third, that the whole Tribunal system as currently constituted and the MRO, are inconsistent in their findings and at worst are a complete joke.

The third ground was probably the most legalistic.

Hope Toby gets off and gets his chance to play in his first AFL final. And has a great game. Although I want Saints to win.

Yes, i hope he gets off too. Victim of anti MFC tribunal bias even if he is now with GWS.

Alas GWS are dangerous. StKilda are not. Hope Saints win though its unlikely.

 
1 hour ago, Redleg said:

I would guess that the grounds of Appeal are:

third, that the whole Tribunal system as currently constituted and the MRO, are inconsistent in their findings and at worst are a complete joke.

The third ground was probably the most legalistic.

How confident are you that the 'you're all a bunch of nincompoops' approach will prove effective?

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

I would guess that the grounds of Appeal are:

first, that the finding was against the weight of the evidence,

second, that the Tribunal misdirected itself, in deciding that if force was not negligible, it must be forceful, without any guidance as to what constituted either category,

third, that the whole Tribunal system as currently constituted and the MRO, are inconsistent in their findings and at worst are a complete joke.

The third ground was probably the most legalistic.

they just don't have the vibe. red

bit like the whole of the afl


16 minutes ago, TRIGON said:

How confident are you that the 'you're all a bunch of nincompoops' approach will prove effective?

It would be hard to argue against.

45 minutes ago, TRIGON said:

How confident are you that the 'you're all a bunch of nincompoops' approach will prove effective?

They will take it as a pat on the back.

34 minutes ago, Redleg said:

It would be hard to argue against.

I have no come back when this argument is thrown at me

Seems ridiculous they would have the Tribunal hearing this week and not last week. 

28 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Seems ridiculous they would have the Tribunal hearing this week and not last week. 

Look at your 2nd word and then see how beautifully it fits with nearly everything the AFL does.


Lucky? Absolute blue murder.

Corruption at its finest.

16 hours ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Seems ridiculous they would have the Tribunal hearing this week and not last week. 

Apparently the AFL couldn't organise anyone to attend the hearing so it got pushed out to this week.

Imagine this level of contempt being shown to a big name player from a big club!!!

4 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Apparently the AFL couldn't organise anyone to attend the hearing so it got pushed out to this week.

Imagine this level of contempt being shown to a big name player from a big club!!!

What time would the hearing suit you best, MrCripps?  You lawyers probably have a big function to attend. 


Love it

 

 
 
The Giants argue the Tribunal's decision to deem high contact 'forceful' was so unreasonable that no Tribunal acting reasonably could have come to that decision having regard to the evidence before it.

If they brought in the dissent rule for tribunal hearing GWS would be in a lot of trouble about now. The only thing they have not said is "your all a bunch of [censored]" but there's still time.

 

  Ahh yes, Carlton.
 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Thanks
    • 566 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 40 replies