Jump to content

Featured Replies

The club won’t sack Goodwin. If we’re smart we’ll move on some assistants and go get the best available. I’d love Leppitsch at the club but that’s unlikely. Goodwin needs some fresh ideas and he needs them soon

 
21 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

We need a change to the assistant coaches at the end of the season. Bring in some fresh ideas. The midfield and forwardline especially is not working. 
 

Goodwin is a good off field coach. Players love him and culturally he’s done so much for the team. But we need to freshen things up in the box. 

Fish rot at the head...... take a minute to let that mull.

Assistants only do the masters bidding.

Swapping them.is like deckchairs really.

The reality is unsettling for some.

The thing the coach is supposed to do....is to WIN games.

Our last 12 months has been telling. You can blame the playing group only so much as the form goes up and down. We lack system and method that can win games.

I’d be happier to accept a loss knowing we are trying to play different, more boldly - use corridor some more. But the stubbornness will cost us 2023 and I cannot really see Goodwin changing anything next year. 
 

I don’t think Yze or Choco will be with us next year so we need to think who we going to target. 

 

After we beat Richmond.

Hardwick in his presser said he knew exactly how we would play and how to beat us. They executed their game style which was effective but they just had way too many good players out to get the job done.

He was essentially saying he outcoached Goodwin. Whilst it has a sour grapes vibe, he was, essentially, right.

Further, Goodwin's favourite saying is that we didn't get the game on our terms. Effectively he's saying we play in a comfort zone and if things aren't going the way we like it, we can't adapt in game.

8 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Fish rot at the head...... take a minute to let that mull.

Assistants only do the masters bidding.

Swapping them.is like deckchairs really.

The reality is unsettling for some.

The thing the coach is supposed to do....is to WIN games.

Didn't take a minute to realise this post is laughable. Stupid. Geelong lost again. Sack Scott.

Edited by Redlagged


16 minutes ago, sydneydee said:

Goodwin has no ideas on how to coach this team. It is another wasted season. Absolutely furious that we lost todays match. 

Go to bed mate 

9 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Fish rot at the head...... take a minute to let that mull.

Assistants only do the masters bidding.

Swapping them.is like deckchairs really.

The reality is unsettling for some.

The thing the coach is supposed to do....is to WIN games.

Apart from when we swapped in Yze and he deck chaired our midfield to sharing the ball far more and won a flag. 

Assistant coaches get the time to work with groups of players more specifically.

And they bring ideas to collaborate with the head coach. 

The greatest coaches have always had incredible staff supporting them. Ignoring that is stupid.

Fresh eyes in and around Goodwin. 

His press conferences are so boring he may as well not do them. 

Unfortunately for our players, we have a game style that just doesn't excite and at the moment, so many of our good players are just underperforming every game. 

Our skills and ball handling this season have been so poor, it's unbelievable. And teams really do just know how to disarm us. 

It's alarming given the quality on our list. 

Something needs to change, not sure it's Goody getting the flick. But list, game plan, assistant coaches all need to be addressed over the offseason. 

 
Just now, DeeSpencer said:

Apart from when we swapped in Yze and he deck chaired our midfield to sharing the ball far more and won a flag. 

Assistant coaches get the time to work with groups of players more specifically.

And they bring ideas to collaborate with the head coach. 

The greatest coaches have always had incredible staff supporting them. Ignoring that is stupid.

DS  you're normally more in tune 

The game plan/style etc is set by the Coach... 

Im not ignoring them... but they simply carry out THEIR  part of the jigsaw as determined by SG

Changing them.... assistants is not the answer. 

Its not that hard to fathom...  not really.

We play dumb.... dumb for 2023.... as others have a much better formula.

We have very good talent....wasted and burnt.

The evidence is right in front of people.

 

Just now, beelzebub said:

DS  you're normally more in tune 

The game plan/style etc is set by the Coach... 

Im not ignoring them... but they simply carry out THEIR  part of the jigsaw as determined by SG

Changing them.... assistants is not the answer. 

Its not that hard to fathom...  not really.

We play dumb.... dumb for 2023.... as others have a much better formula.

We have very good talent....wasted and burnt.

The evidence is right in front of people.

 

The coach sets the menu but it’s up to the assistants to get every group of players to execute.

If you don’t think Yze didn’t make a huge difference to our midfield in 2021 then I don’t know what more I can say.

Or Leppa at Richmond and Collingwood or Bevo and Adam Simpson at Hawthorn under Clarko 

It’s not 1975 any more, it takes a team of coaches and part of that is fresh experts who know how implement different ideas.


1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

The coach sets the menu but it’s up to the assistants to get every group of players to execute.

If you don’t think Yze didn’t make a huge difference to our midfield in 2021 then I don’t know what more I can say.

Or Leppa at Richmond and Collingwood or Bevo and Adam Simpson at Hawthorn under Clarko 

It’s not 1975 any more, it takes a team of coaches and part of that is fresh experts who know how implement different ideas.

Absolute rubbish

Who tells who to kick where.. Who creates the game ?? 

Ffs

People refuse to see whats in front of them 

2 hours ago, Redlagged said:

Yep. 2 losses on the trot and the coach is suddenly hopeless. Smart.

Not saying hopeless but stubborn, but where have we improved from 21?

2 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Absolute rubbish

Who tells who to kick where.. Who creates the game ?? 

Ffs

People refuse to see whats in front of them 

 

5 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

The coach sets the menu but it’s up to the assistants to get every group of players to execute.

If you don’t think Yze didn’t make a huge difference to our midfield in 2021 then I don’t know what more I can say.

Or Leppa at Richmond and Collingwood or Bevo and Adam Simpson at Hawthorn under Clarko 

It’s not 1975 any more, it takes a team of coaches and part of that is fresh experts who know how implement different ideas.

But has Yze improved them since 21?

Goodwin is no good and like the nice club we are we’ll keep him on for far too long. 

Edited by Roost it far

I have never asked for a change since the Mark Neeld days, but I think Goody has shown a real lack to adapt in the previous 2 years. Not sure if he is stubborn or just lacking in tactical skill. I think we will continue the same path as we have since round 10 last year. This will be Goodys last year I feel and we will be outside our window next year.

Edited by SPC


The one thing that concerns me at the moment from a coaching perspective is that, accordingly to Goodwin, we still don’t know what our best mix is. We don’t know what the forward line should look like, or how Gawn and Grundy are best used together, or what the midfield mix needs to be. Hell we haven’t even got a settled back 6. 
 

Now I understand that injuries have made that more difficult, but at nearly the halfway mark of the season, for the coaches not to know what they ultimately want the side to look like in September, is really really worrying. They’ve had a whole pre season to work it out and yet here we are still confused. 

3 minutes ago, SPC said:

I have never asked for a change since the Mark Neeld days, but I think Goody has shown a real lack to adapt in the previous 2 years. Not sure if he is stubborn or just lacking in tactical skill. I think we will continue the same path as we have since round 10 last year. This will be Goodys last year I feel and we will be outside our window next year.

A new coach would have us back in the window in no time. It’s just Goodwin ain’t leaving 

19 minutes ago, JimmyGadson said:

Fresh eyes in and around Goodwin. 

His press conferences are so boring he may as well not do them. 

Unfortunately for our players, we have a game style that just doesn't excite and at the moment, so many of our good players are just underperforming every game. 

Our skills and ball handling this season have been so poor, it's unbelievable. And teams really do just know how to disarm us. 

It's alarming given the quality on our list. 

Something needs to change, not sure it's Goody getting the flick. But list, game plan, assistant coaches all need to be addressed over the offseason. 

At what point is it on the players to get the job done?

We've been here before and the answer was always the same. The players need to step up.

We’re paying for the list decisions made in order to win the flag and the list inaction the last 2 years.

Tomlinson was a panic job post 2019 to get a wing. BBB a desperation move to win a flag, it worked, but it really hurts now! Recontracting T Mc. Trading up in the mess of the 2020 draft and taking Laurie now seems a costly mistake.

Then we took lost our quickest players in Baker, Hunt and Bedford and our only prime age key forward in Weid.

Gawn has to play more forward which clearly isn’t his go. Grundy at times might out perform Jackson but he isn’t bringing the same mobility as a forward that let us play Ben Brown in the same side.

How are we meant to play a more attacking run and carry plan if our midfield and backline have only got slower by getting Hunter and sticking with Brayshaw? 

Our defenders still refuse to run the ball out through the fat side or corridor and I can’t believe that’s all coaching. If it is a fresh backline assistant would help.

A tall defender who trusts their ability to run and kick and a genuinely speedy small defender would open things up. As would an on baller who gut runs to receive to take the load of Clarry. Not to mention one who can kick!

And it doesn't really need saying, but I will anyway. It's round 11. It's even a bit early for the let's get new assistants around Goodwin, let alone the old dopey one, Goodwin fluked the flag.


Well, his win-loss rate in both the home & away season and in finals is a little better than Alistair Clarkson's, so let's give him another 230 games to see how he goes.

Gonna suggest Clarkson had a pretty good list to work with, too.

1 minute ago, A F said:

And it doesn't really need saying, but I will anyway. It's round 11. It's even a bit early for the let's get new assistants around Goodwin, let alone the old dopey one, Goodwin fluked the flag.

We could win the flag and I’d still think 3-5 years is about the appropriate length of time for most assistants. Even if you just shuffle the jobs.

2 hours ago, ElDiablo14 said:

A couple of weeks ago a Pies supporter told me Goodwin is not a great coach, almost saying he was lucky to have a flag and overrated.

I actually tried to defend Goodwin's coaching and told him about how good his defensive structures are and how the players believed in him, almost like a father figure.

I am now starting to believe that what my Pies colleague said is true, Goodwin is overrated. I started to go through all the seasons we have been under his wing, lots of wasted seasons and missed opportunities (see 2017 and 2020).

 

I still believe we have a top 5 list, is the coach good enough for this list?

Where would you place Goodwin among all the current AFL coaches? Top 6? Not even top 8?

A Colonwood person is about the last place I'd been looking for informed opinion.

 
4 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

We could win the flag and I’d still think 3-5 years is about the appropriate length of time for most assistants. Even if you just shuffle the jobs.

The thing is, let's say one area of the ground goes through the roof in the second half of the year, we win the flag, and the players all credit it with that assistant etc etc.

You're saying, nup, I have an arbitrary 3-5 year rule that assistants must move on, sorry, I know you helped us win two flags in three years and there was a second place finish in there too, but it's off you pop.

You can't be making those sorts of decisions at this stage. Let's give it a month and if nothing has changed, by all means, let's consider these sorts of decisions then.

Edited by A F

6 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

The one thing that concerns me at the moment from a coaching perspective is that, accordingly to Goodwin, we still don’t know what our best mix is. We don’t know what the forward line should look like, or how Gawn and Grundy are best used together, or what the midfield mix needs to be. Hell we haven’t even got a settled back 6. 
 

Now I understand that injuries have made that more difficult, but at nearly the halfway mark of the season, for the coaches not to know what they ultimately want the side to look like in September, is really really worrying. They’ve had a whole pre season to work it out and yet here we are still confused. 

Really? 

Best 22’s are never entirely settled and we bought in Bowser only weeks from finals in 2021 for instance.

But I’d suggest at this stage we’re happy with the 2 talls and Hibbo down back. We’re happy with Petty and JVR up forward we just need Petty healthy and to ride some bumps with JVR.

What to do with Gus and I suspect whether we need an extra mid rather than one of the small forwards might be questions we’re yet to answer but I don’t think it’s that unsettled. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 98 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 371 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies