Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Gather Round should be called "COVID Round" because the entire competition is being moved interstate 

47 minutes ago, ElDiablo14 said:

I thought it was a sold out game already? Granted AO is only a 50k ground.

Yep it's sold out but that's because it is a double header.  Port Adelaide etc fans have to purchase a ticket to our game to go watch theirs apparently... so likely that our game will have low crowd numbers

 
5 minutes ago, DeelightfulPlay said:

Yep it's sold out but that's because it is a double header.  Port Adelaide etc fans have to purchase a ticket to our game to go watch theirs apparently... so likely that our game will have low crowd numbers

Ok got it. I thought it was a separate ticketing 


8 minutes ago, ElDiablo14 said:

Ok got it. I thought it was a separate ticketing 

That would be more sensible imo!  But guess this is AFL after all...!

Key  here is get a fair bit of stringer up the ground by taking it heavily out of the middle. Grundy very important component here with his follow up after the bounce, and no stupid free kicks, because there will be all your favourite maggot numbers in this game and we all know how much maggots love bummers.

 
4 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

I know it's not against the crows or Port but our third game in 5 on the road? Thanks Afl.

 

Of our first 10 matches, five are interstate. Then a block of three home games at the ‘G, then the bye,  and then… (cue the shower scene from Psycho music) Geelong in Geelong *shudder*

But then we play every game bar one (round 24 in Sydney) at either the ‘G or Marvel.

It’s better to get the interstate games out of the way in the first half of the season. 

2 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Of our first 10 matches, five are interstate. Then a block of three home games at the ‘G, then the bye,  and then… (cue the shower scene from Psycho music) Geelong in Geelong *shudder*

But then we play every game bar one (round 24 in Sydney) at either the ‘G or Marvel.

It’s better to get the interstate games out of the way in the first half of the season. 

Not quite.

The week after Geelong we've got GWS in Alice Springs.

We also have North Melbourne in Round 21 in Hobart.

So post-bye we have Sydney, Hobart, Alice Springs and Geelong, with the other 6 games in Melbourne (one Marvel, 5 MCG).

The upside to it, I suppose, is that we don't have any genuine interstate games between Round 10 vs Port and Round 24 vs Sydney - only our own sold game in Alice Springs and North in Hobart.


I find this "travelling interstate" issue a distraction. Every club, bar those based in Victoria travel interstate almost every second week. Why should Victorian clubs complain?

7 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Of our first 10 matches, five are interstate. Then a block of three home games at the ‘G, then the bye,  and then… (cue the shower scene from Psycho music) Geelong in Geelong *shudder*

But then we play every game bar one (round 24 in Sydney) at either the ‘G or Marvel.

It’s better to get the interstate games out of the way in the first half of the season. 

I agree we have 2 down at least.

It's all fine and we'll for some teams to have soft draws but at the end of the day they will crumble against us.

4 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I find this "travelling interstate" issue a distraction. Every club, bar those based in Victoria travel interstate almost every second week. Why should Victorian clubs complain?

It's not the fact we have to travel, it's the unevenness between each Victorian club's travel schedules.

All interstate sides have the same number of interstate games every year, almost always spread out the same way (alternating each week).

Victorian clubs vary - some get 6 games away, some get 8, some get them all in the first half, some get them all in the second half, etc.

Last year I felt that too much of our travel was in the post-bye period of our fixture and compressed together (e.g. that six week period where each game was at a different venue) which was more difficult than some of our competitors.

4 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Why do we have this Gather round and what does it represent?

Seriously curious.

 

It’s another money-making idea of Gil’s. Scrap one of the (official) practice matches, thereby making room for an extra round. Practice matches don’t make money for the AFL. An extra round does.

As to why it’s the Gather Round, my guess is that it’s the novelty aspect that the AFL hope is embraced. Although I just see it as players, players’ families, coaches and fans of all 18 clubs converging on one small city. Hence there’s those of us who have to make the car trip there and back, and in one day, coz what little accommodation is still available has - in most cases - doubled or even trebled in cost.

Of course, it’ll be worth every sore muscle (from being in a car for so long) and every headache (from lack of sleep) if we can just go out there and SMASH THE BOMBERS LIKE THEY’VE NEVER BEEN SMASHED BEFORE!!!!! 

1 hour ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Didn't I read somewhere that the SA government is paying the AFL $10m for the rights to hold this round? And did I also read that each club will get $500,000? Or am I thinking of something else?

It still doesn't explain why the competition has been expanded so that each team now plays 23 home and away games, though. 

Personally, I think it's a stupid idea but I am sure the spinners and their media acolytes will tell us next week that it was a huge success, whatever happens.

The people getting a free weekend interstate in posh hotels and tickets to watch a stack of games with corporate hospitality will like it, who knew?!

I reckon it’s probably a good deal for the governments too, even if it’s a huge price. If they get 50k tourists dropping a a grand each that easily covers the outlay.

The 23rd game stops teams losing a home game.

I just can’t believe they’ve got the plays on board for such a low fee IIRC. I’d be asking for a lot if I was a player. 


12 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Not quite.

The week after Geelong we've got GWS in Alice Springs.

We also have North Melbourne in Round 21 in Hobart.

So post-bye we have Sydney, Hobart, Alice Springs and Geelong, with the other 6 games in Melbourne (one Marvel, 5 MCG).

The upside to it, I suppose, is that we don't have any genuine interstate games between Round 10 vs Port and Round 24 vs Sydney - only our own sold game in Alice Springs and North in Hobart.

You’re right. I forgot about the Alice game (probs coz I know I can’t attend it 😭) and the Hobart game (coz we don’t know what day/time therefore haven’t been able to book anything yet). I was going by memory. And my brain doesn’t compute well when it comes to anything after going to Geelong. *again, shudder*

4 hours ago, Elwood 3184 said:

Bad luck to Sam Weideman on getting concussion and missing out on playing this week. At least it means he can’t do a Jayden Hunt and star against his old team.

yeah not sure he starred. he played a decent game, turned it over a bit but got 20 possies. 

2 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

The people getting a free weekend interstate in posh hotels and tickets to watch a stack of games with corporate hospitality will like it, who knew?!

I reckon it’s probably a good deal for the governments too, even if it’s a huge price. If they get 50k tourists dropping a a grand each that easily covers the outlay.

The 23rd game stops teams losing a home game.

I just can’t believe they’ve got the plays on board for such a low fee IIRC. I’d be asking for a lot if I was a player. 

Nothing wrong with the concept but the execution leaves a lot to be desired.

Stretching it over two weeks with a bye for the non participating clubs would deliver a lot more revenue

Event construction be it the GP or a flower show is here to stay.

33 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I find this "travelling interstate" issue a distraction. Every club, bar those based in Victoria travel interstate almost every second week. Why should Victorian clubs complain?

Because it's our game and they are just along for the ride.

I won an all expenses trip to Angove Winery through work last year but was too busy to go. When the footy fixture released I always look for the Essendon game as my fiancee is Essendon. I was happy to see it was the gather round so I made this trip work around this game. Flights, accommodation, eftpos card, car, the whole works. The only thing that isn't covered is the coin toss. Really looking forward to the buzz around Adelaide for the week


6 minutes ago, Stevienic23 said:

I won an all expenses trip to Angove Winery through work last year but was too busy to go. When the footy fixture released I always look for the Essendon game as my fiancee is Essendon. I was happy to see it was the gather round so I made this trip work around this game. Flights, accommodation, eftpos card, car, the whole works. The only thing that isn't covered is the coin toss. Really looking forward to the buzz around Adelaide for the week

We need to talk, Stevie 😑

Bombers kicked 11:22 against GWS

they will try to play a magpies style game against us

Could be closer than many think

 
14 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Keep Stringer Quiet 

He was on it today

On what this time?

5 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

If Hibbo isn't injured I want him in. But I also want Bbb up fwd.

I have no idea who to drop.

Maybe Hibbo is the sub.

 

Not sub if not 100%

5 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Why do we have this Gather round and what does it represent?

Seriously curious.

 

Seriously curious.
 

Sure is.  
 

Which American sporting media code did he copy this from?

8 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

We need to talk, Stevie 😑

I almost went full junket and stayed an extra week to go to the LIV event haha


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies