Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

2022

 

2021

 

2020

 

2019

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st game

18/3 H

 

16/3 H

20/3 H

22/3 A

23/3 H

25/3 H

25/3  A

25/3 H

4/4 H

22/3 A

31/3 H

31/3 H

27/3 H

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oct week 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,068 21

15,211 20

21,980  22

19,026     26

16,654 22

17,625  25

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nov week 3

 

 

30,000 26

 

 

 

 

20,215  21

25,028 22

26,064  18

23,037     26

20,509  26

20,223  25

-

16,287

11,922

Dec week 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,005  7

30,096  7

28,354 07

27,914   9

24,402      4

22,433  3

22,105  11

18,217  3

18,747 2

17,541  3

Dec week 3

 

 

38,000 23

 

 

28,447  21

31,759  21

29,053 22

29,426  23

26,217     22

24,097  23

23,542  25

 

 

20,623

20,166

Jan week 3

 

 

40,000 21

 

 

29,764  21

33,226  21

30,068 19

30,200  20

27,027     19

25,112  23

24,558  21

21,873

22,402

22,396

Feb week 1

 

 

40,823 7

 

 

30,141  7

34,327   7

30,577 2

31,141   3

28,013      3

25,647   1

25,416   4

22,962   8

23,422

23,457

Feb week 2

44,552 19

 

41,562 14

 

 

32,157  14

35,148  14

31,310 14

31,537  10

28,759     17

26,290  12

26,039  12

23,650  12

21,448  12

 

 

Feb week 3

 

 

42,463 21

32,954  21

32,735 21

36,070  21

32,075 21

32,137  17

29,217     24

26,639  18

26,641  17

23,650  18

24,195  16

25,253  17

Feb week 4

49,850 28

44.526  28

33,458 28

32,985 28

36,973  28

32,948 28

32,679  24

29,450     26

27,066  26

27,736  26

-

25,277

 

 

Mar week 1

50,054  7

 

44,903 7

35,874  7

35,726 7

37,979  7

34,034  7

33,520   3

30,524      7

27,619   4

28,582   4

24,801   5

26,023

27,806

Mar week 2

52,738 14

 

49,667 14

37,083 14

36,063 14

39,537  14

34,691  14

35,080  16

32,623     16

29,510  16

30,421  15

26,751  14

26,791  14

28,068

Mar week 3

55,528 21

 

51,513 21

41,055 21

37,571  21

41,513  21

36,513  21

35,756  21

33,146    21

30,257  21

-

-

 

 

 

 

Mar week 4

56,572  28

 

54,164 28

41,325 28

37,888  28

44,008  28

38,089  28

37,025  28

35,117     26

31,035  26

32,324  28

-

29,588

31,087

Apr week 1

57,558 7

 

55,595 7

42,088 7

38,115  7

45,537  7

39,402   7

38,554   7

35,535     1

32,001   1

-

-

32,235

33,359

Apr week 2

58,385 14

 

56,841 14

43,421 14

38,246  14

46,133 14

40,160  14

39,005  14

36,157     8

33,301   9

33,175  14

-

-

33,753  10

Apr week 3

59,220 21

 

57,289  21

44,934 21

38,286  21

47,174  21

40,557  21

39,281   21

36,731     20

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,548  20

Apr week 4

59,545 28

 

57,802 28

46,093 28

38,431 28

48,080  28

40,636  28

39,634  28

37,597     30

34,068  29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May week 1

60,673  7

 

59,144 7

46,896  7

38,521 7

49,837  7

41,640  7

40,083  7

37,766      6

34,352    7

35,205   5

-

34,489

35,205

May week 2

61,324 14

 

60,000 14

46,896 14

38,591 14

50,107 14

41,825  14

40,380  14

38,102     13

-

-

-

34,961

 

 

May week 3

63,750 21

60,303 21

48,784 21

38,673  21

50,422  21

42,057 21

40,549  21

38,327     23

34,871  20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May week 4

63,869 28

60,782 28

48,784 28

38,673  28

50,520  28

42,352  28

40,749  28

38,479     31

35,017  22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June week 1

64,135 7

 

61,652 7

50,085 7

38,766 7

51,770  7

43,593  7

40,934   7

38,547     6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jun Week 2

64,492 14

 

62,095 14

50,085 14

38,985  14

51,770  14

43,791 14

41,022  14

38,653     14

-

 

 

-

35,403

 

 

Jun week 3

64,751 21

 

62,646 21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jun week 4

64,929 28

 

62,738 28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July week 1

64,976 7

 

65,472 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July week 2

67,122 14

 

65,756 14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July week 3

67,177 21

 

65,816 21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Final July 31

 

67,673

 

65,902

53,188

 

39,774

 

52,405

 

44,191

 

42,102

 

39,211

 

35,953

 

35,911

 

33,177

 

35,345

 

36,937

 

Post 31 July

 

70,785

66,484

54,495

40,531

52,446

45,178

42,233

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023 Progressive total in Red

Actual dates in Blue

Date of first game of season Home or Away

Edited by george_on_the_outer

 
  • 4 weeks later...
On 11/17/2022 at 10:54 AM, george_on_the_outer said:

...Awaiting the first numbers from the Club for season 2023......

Still waiting for my membership pack... Hope it comes before the season starts otherwise I will have to ring the credit card company up.

 
On 11/17/2022 at 10:54 AM, george_on_the_outer said:

...Awaiting the first numbers from the Club for season 2023......

If 66,484 at the end of last year is the comparable number - you will need to change the thread to Products Tally....

At end of July 2022 we had 59,700 individual members. Happy for you and the Club to keep using the higher number (because the other Clubs probably do the same). Just the thread name isn't correct.....

On 12/14/2022 at 6:56 PM, Hawk the Demon said:

If 66,484 at the end of last year is the comparable number - you will need to change the thread to Products Tally....

At end of July 2022 we had 59,700 individual members. Happy for you and the Club to keep using the higher number (because the other Clubs probably do the same). Just the thread name isn't correct.....

WTF are you talking about??

If i buy 6 memberships and pay for them it is 6 Memberships. 
 

Are you a Hawthorn Member?


2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

WTF are you talking about??

If i buy 6 memberships and pay for them it is 6 Memberships. 
 

Are you a Hawthorn Member?

Let's work through this - you buy six reserved seats,  all in your name?

2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

WTF are you talking about??

If i buy 6 memberships and pay for them it is 6 Memberships. 
 

Are you a Hawthorn Member?

i just assumed it was tgr 

57 minutes ago, Hawk the Demon said:

Let's work through this - you buy six reserved seats,  all in your name?

No. But if i did, it is still 6 legitimate Memberships 

Money in the Bank….

 
8 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

No. But if i did, it is still 6 legitimate Memberships 

Money in the Bank….

Maybe an example would help. A rusted-on generous Demon buys or renews 4 Redlegs or Trident memberships for the family. The same member joins the President's Club for a year and takes out a player sponsorship. My understanding is that the Club (or more specifically the AFL as it all runs through Ticketmaster) will then count that as 6 'memberships' or 'products', even though there are only 4 humans involved.

Great for the Club - good money - and I suspect the same for all Clubs. If the system stays unchanged the larger membership number published by the Clubs and the AFL will always run ahead of the actual number of members by, in our case, over 10% (the difference between 66,484 and 59,700. That's just the way it is - no drama I guess?

Let's see what numbers George is able to gather this year.......

2 hours ago, Hawk the Demon said:

Maybe an example would help. A rusted-on generous Demon buys or renews 4 Redlegs or Trident memberships for the family. The same member joins the President's Club for a year and takes out a player sponsorship. My understanding is that the Club (or more specifically the AFL as it all runs through Ticketmaster) will then count that as 6 'memberships' or 'products', even though there are only 4 humans involved.

I know the example is hypothetical but the number of 'additional' memberships from that source(s) are so few that the impact on membership numbers is negligible.


@Its Time for Anotherdo you still have the contact in 'Memberships' at the club to obtain the latest figure - it seems they have forgotten to update it to this year.

 

ps Really like your name change.  Agree: Its Time for Another!!

4 hours ago, Hawk the Demon said:

Maybe an example would help. A rusted-on generous Demon buys or renews 4 Redlegs or Trident memberships for the family. The same member joins the President's Club for a year and takes out a player sponsorship. My understanding is that the Club (or more specifically the AFL as it all runs through Ticketmaster) will then count that as 6 'memberships' or 'products', even though there are only 4 humans involved.

Great for the Club - good money - and I suspect the same for all Clubs. If the system stays unchanged the larger membership number published by the Clubs and the AFL will always run ahead of the actual number of members by, in our case, over 10% (the difference between 66,484 and 59,700. That's just the way it is - no drama I guess?

Let's see what numbers George is able to gather this year.......

66,484 Memberships were purchased. 
that is the number that counts

2 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I know the example is hypothetical but the number of 'additional' memberships from that source(s) are so few that the impact on membership numbers is negligible.

That was just an example. Examples like that expalin the difference of 6,774 (over 10%) - not negligible.

From the MFC itself:

'There are approximately 59,700 MFC members (this differs from the number of
66,484 published on the AFL website due to several individuals holding multiple
memberships)'
 

3 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I know the example is hypothetical but the number of 'additional' memberships from that source(s) are so few that the impact on membership numbers is negligible.

I have 17 children, four wives and 2 Cats who all have MFC memberships... So is that one membership as counted by the MFC ?


2 minutes ago, David-Demon said:

I have 17 children, four wives and 2 Cats who all have MFC memberships... So is that one membership as counted by the MFC ?

Do you want me to start you a gofundme account to raise money for a vasectomy?

18 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

@Its Time for Anotherdo you still have the contact in 'Memberships' at the club to obtain the latest figure - it seems they have forgotten to update it to this year.

 

ps Really like your name change.  Agree: Its Time for Another!!

Hi Luci I just rang the membership number. No specific contact. They were always happy to give me the current number. 
it took 13 years on here for my originall name It's Time to become redundant. I'm still basking in that glory. But it's nice to think about another. Although my wife wants to go O/S next Sept the only time she'll be free so I could still miss actually seeing one. 

2 hours ago, Its Time for Another said:

Hi Luci I just rang the membership number. No specific contact. They were always happy to give me the current number. 
it took 13 years on here for my originall name It's Time to become redundant. I'm still basking in that glory. But it's nice to think about another. Although my wife wants to go O/S next Sept the only time she'll be free so I could still miss actually seeing one. 

Thanks ITFA.  If I get a chance I'll call the club tomorrow.

Hope you figure out bribe your way back for the GF, if we make it.  😉

17 hours ago, Nascent said:

Do you want me to start you a gofundme account to raise money for a vasectomy?

5 Facts You Should Know Before Having a Vasectomy - Penn Medicine

21 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I know the example is hypothetical but the number of 'additional' memberships from that source(s) are so few that the impact on membership numbers is negligible.

l bought 5 × 13 Clayton Oliver memberships with a couple of games left in the season


19 hours ago, Hawk the Demon said:

That was just an example. Examples like that expalin the difference of 6,774 (over 10%) - not negligible.

From the MFC itself:

'There are approximately 59,700 MFC members (this differs from the number of
66,484 published on the AFL website due to several individuals holding multiple
memberships)'

 

Members vs Memberships numbers was covered in this thread

 

 

I don't see much point repeating the discussion here.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

20 hours ago, Hawk the Demon said:

That was just an example. Examples like that expalin the difference of 6,774 (over 10%) - not negligible.

From the MFC itself:

'There are approximately 59,700 MFC members (this differs from the number of
66,484 published on the AFL website due to several individuals holding multiple
memberships)'
 

So what if the actual member numbers differ from memberships? As SWYL stated, the Club (in fact all Clubs) benefits from the number of memberships sold. As all clubs are measured this way, I don’t see the issue, and cannot understand why you are making such a big deal about it. 

21 hours ago, Hawk the Demon said:

That was just an example. Examples like that expalin the difference of 6,774 (over 10%) - not negligible.

From the MFC itself:

'There are approximately 59,700 MFC members (this differs from the number of
66,484 published on the AFL website due to several individuals holding multiple
memberships)'
 

So what, your examples would apply to all clubs, just trying to stir up more garbage.

 
1 hour ago, drysdale demon said:

So what, your examples would apply to all clubs, just trying to stir up more garbage.

You haven't followed the entire thread sir.

Great for the Club - good money - and I suspect the same for all Clubs - was my earlier post.

Just looking for the truth (for us, the AFL and all Clubs) - I am sure George will get that from the Club eventually....

6 minutes ago, Hawk the Demon said:

You haven't followed the entire thread sir.

Great for the Club - good money - and I suspect the same for all Clubs - was my earlier post.

Just looking for the truth (for us, the AFL and all Clubs) - I am sure George will get that from the Club eventually....

give it a rest, hawk. it's just boring you going on and on over such trivia 😒


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies