Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

It makes me sick it should be us up there.

Maybe they watched "To Hell and Back" and thought better of involving melbourne....

 
1 hour ago, old dee said:

They will win a flag before we do.

With the greatest respect Old Dee, can I ask why your posts are always so negative? (And I don’t want to hear about the last dreadful 56 years again!)  I love DL - I can always get some facts, a lot of BS, and some laughs - all of which I enjoy. I even enjoy the kooks on here. But when every post from a lovely old man is always so negative, it’s such a downer.(and I have no wish to turn you off - just want more “up-beatness” In your tone).

just once I’d luv to hear you say something positive. And that does not include you saying that you’re positive that you are a pessimist!


24 minutes ago, Neil Crompton said:

With the greatest respect Old Dee, can I ask why your posts are always so negative? (And I don’t want to hear about the last dreadful 56 years again!)  I love DL - I can always get some facts, a lot of BS, and some laughs - all of which I enjoy. I even enjoy the kooks on here. But when every post from a lovely old man is always so negative, it’s such a downer.(and I have no wish to turn you off - just want more “up-beatness” In your tone).

just once I’d luv to hear you say something positive. And that does not include you saying that you’re positive that you are a pessimist!

No idea how people perceive what I write NC, I said this back in 2018 and 19  when we fell in against them and again last year.

They are improving their list each year and have a FD that at last seems to know what it is doing.

Their development seems on the rise each year ours has fallen the last two years.

I just have the feeling they will get to a flag before us. What you see as negative I see as realism.

I have not been wrong on Demonland to often about where we will finish each year.

I expect us to finish in the eight this year but win a flag not for a few years yet, who knows we might play Carlton in our next GF appearance.

 

"I just have the feeling they will get to a flag before us. What you see as negative I see as realism."

We are talking about Carlton, right? The Carlton with this recent record...

2020 11th

2019 16th

2018 18th

2017 16th

2016 14th

2015 18th

2014 13th

2013 8th (was that the Essendrug year?)

Can someone please point out how that record represents development?

1 hour ago, waynewussell said:

"I just have the feeling they will get to a flag before us. What you see as negative I see as realism."

We are talking about Carlton, right? The Carlton with this recent record...

2020 11th

2019 16th

2018 18th

2017 16th

2016 14th

2015 18th

2014 13th

2013 8th (was that the Essendrug year?)

Can someone please point out how that record represents development?

You don't see that 18, 16 and 11 as going in the right direction? 

 
31 minutes ago, old dee said:

You don't see that 18, 16 and 11 as going in the right direction? 

improvement isn’t linear, surely us supporters have learnt that by now

also by that logic, you don’t see 17th to 9th as going in the right direction? 

1 hour ago, old dee said:

You don't see that 18, 16 and 11 as going in the right direction? 

We were going in the right direction for longer  look what happened.  17th 14th  11th  9th  4th  from 2014 to 2018  17th in 2019.

 


1 hour ago, nacnud said:

improvement isn’t linear, surely us supporters have learnt that by now

also by that logic, you don’t see 17th to 9th as going in the right direction? 

Yep 

30 minutes ago, nosoupforme said:

We were going in the right direction for longer  look what happened.  17th 14th  11th  9th  4th  from 2014 to 2018  17th in 2019.

 

But we are still outside looking in nosoupforme as are Carlton I just think they will get there before us.

7 minutes ago, old dee said:

But we are still outside looking in nosoupforme as are Carlton I just think they will get there before us.

The amount of coverage that lot get is incredible, their worm graph has showed [censored] all positive movement since the turn of the century.

Absolutely mind boggling.

Just to add we don't need be doing any pre season docos any time soon. 

Not winning anything without a Curnow and it looks like they may never see him in Navy blue again.

 

Edited by Win4theAges

41 minutes ago, Win4theAges said:

The amount of coverage that lot get is incredible, their worm graph has showed [censored] all positive movement since the turn of the century.

Absolutely mind boggling.

Just to add we don't need be doing any pre season docos any time soon. 

Not winning anything without a Curnow and it looks like they may never see him in Navy blue again.

 

They have their own ground and way more members than us with deep pockets. They will improve.

Agreed on the own ground and more members, I just can't see them being a side challenging any time soon. 

Over reliant on Cripps (overrated and on one knee), Mcgovern $800,000 a year for a 3rd tall who can mark and Jack Martin $900,000 a year for 2 years and plays half forward, they are know where near it.

Paying overs for role players like Mcgovern and Martin will see you nowhere near a premiership, list mangement is know where to be seen at the Blues.

Edited by Win4theAges


To hell and back showed why lowly teams sohuldn't make docos.

Edited by Doug Reemer

19 hours ago, old dee said:

They will win a flag before we do.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Eddie Betts is worth a look so I’ll watch the first episode. Not sure about the rest of them. If AFL sanctioned can’t see it being anything other than bland and inoffensive.

10 hours ago, Win4theAges said:

Agreed on the own ground and more members, I just can't see them being a side challenging any time soon. 

Over reliant on Cripps (overrated and on one knee), Mcgovern $800,000 a year for a 3rd tall who can mark and Jack Martin $900,000 a year for 2 years and plays half forward, they are know where near it.

Paying overs for role players like Mcgovern and Martin will see you nowhere near a premiership, list mangement is know where to be seen at the Blues.

What about us paying overs for a bloke who probably won't play the first half of the season?

3 minutes ago, old dee said:

What about us paying overs for a bloke who probably won't play the first half of the season?

Give the man a chance to play first OD.


3 minutes ago, Win4theAges said:

Give the man a chance to play first OD.

I was just suggesting it is not only Carlton who make mistakes. We paid overs for a bloke with a crook knee.

In the end I can just see Carlton getting there first. Of course a large part of that is doubts about the MFC making a good fist of what they have. half a century of failure leaves its mark.

13 minutes ago, old dee said:

What about us paying overs for a bloke who probably won't play the first half of the season?

Who are you talking about here, old black cloud of misery and gloom?

If you're referring to Ben Brown, we got him for next to nothing.  It was our picks 26, 33 and a future 4th rounder in exchange for Brown, pick 28 and a future 4th rounder, so essentially he cost us pick 33..  That is not "overs".

I genuinely believe you need to seek professional help for your condition.

8 minutes ago, old dee said:

I was just suggesting it is not only Carlton who make mistakes. We paid overs for a bloke with a crook knee.

In the end I can just see Carlton getting there first. Of course a large part of that is doubts about the MFC making a good fist of what they have. half a century of failure leaves its mark.

we paid overs? effectively preuss for ben brown; one is a bit-part ruckman with less than 20 afl games under his belt who was behind the best ruckman in the league and an exciting man-child, the other is a genuine key forward in the exact position we were looking to fill

cats paid far, far more for jeremy cameron in THREE first round picks - his recent output and injury concerns going forward are like-for-like with ben brown

 
2 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

we paid overs? effectively preuss for ben brown; one is a bit-part ruckman with less than 20 afl games under his belt who was behind the best ruckman in the league and an exciting man-child, the other is a genuine key forward in the exact position we were looking to fill

cats paid far, far more for jeremy cameron in THREE first round picks - his recent output and injury concerns going forward are like-for-like with ben brown

I am talking about his salary. Why were North so keen to get him out? his 2020 season was reduced to little because of a knee injury. Seems he still has it.

14 minutes ago, old dee said:

I am talking about his salary. Why were North so keen to get him out? his 2020 season was reduced to little because of a knee injury. Seems he still has it.

again, by comparison, jezza cameron is probably on double what we are paying ben brown - brown was ooc at the end of last season, vs cameron being on $1m a season heading into 2021

you have to pay a minimum for your salary cap regardless, so it's a moot point


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies