Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Gawn - our only winner

Hibberd - was hardly sighted

Viney - prolific without effect

Petracca - tried but limited

Oliver - few effective disposals

Fritsch - some classy touches

vandenBerg - little to commend

Salem - tentative and slow

Rivers - brave but limited

Langdon - tried but restricted 

May - had little impact 

Melksham - continued to underperform 

Tomlinson - was rarely noticed

Neal- Bullen - had no influence 

Baker - didn’t take chances

Hunt - a nothing game

Weideman - overrated and underperforming 

Bedford - just a kid

Preuss - the experiment failed

Pickett - Bambi in lights

Smith - stuck to task

Lever - limited skills exposed

 

Langdon - Played wrong side...(side of the ground in the first Q)

 

Gawn - completely under utilised

Hibberd - trade to Essendscum

Viney - will never arrive

Petracca - Not Martin yet

Oliver - so ineffectual again

Fritsch - DHS

vandenBerg - back to Ainslie

Salem - one trick pony

Rivers - certainly worth persisting

Langdon - at least runs

May - no good forward

Melksham - what a disaster

Tomlinson - GWS made call

Neal- Bullen - please no more

Baker - no impact tonight

Hunt - jury is in

Weideman - coaching F*&king him

Bedford - still early days

Preuss - sometimes shows heart

Pickett - Really not ready

Smith - wasn't the worst

Lever - please shave moustache 

Goodloss . . . please resign tonight


Smith, ANB, Hunt, Preuss, Baker, Bedford - not AFL standard

Pickett - not fixing mistakes

Weideman - coaching not helping

Melksham - not a tagger

May - not a forward

Gawn - inadequate, ineffective leadership

Petracca, Oliver, Viney - no midfield support

Goodwin - poor coaching, again.

O M G 

27 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - our only winner  tried hard   Battled and contested marks. BUT hit outs were not effective   Cost two goals which was crucial 

Hibberd - was hardly sighted  tried to run but needs to use the corridor 

Viney - prolific without effect  Gets the footy but not effective disposals 

Petracca - tried but limited tried and tried but fumbled and fumbled and lifted and fell and lifted and fell and kicked it forward to no one 

Oliver - few effective disposals, see Viney  gets the pill and huge heart but turnover and poor disposal 

Fritsch - some classy touches  soft and slow but then moves well and good goal so he’s frustrating 

vandenBerg - little to commend, hard at it but fumbled far too much 

Salem - tentative and slow, strange game and looks not fully fit 

Rivers - brave but limited But brave and brave and took on the game  At 19, a big ✅

Langdon - tried but restricted but big heart and runs and battled ✅

May - had little impact , stopped Taberner so a win ✅

Melksham - continued to underperform - did he play ? Underwhelming 

Tomlinson - was rarely noticed - did he play? Underwhelming 

Neal- Bullen - had no influence - did he play- ❌

Baker - didn’t take chances - another week to see what he does 

Hunt - a nothing game -battled battled battled 

Weideman - overrated and underperforming - conditions didn’t suit 

Bedford - just a kid- showed glimpses

Preuss - the experiment failed  weather did not help him  but his chase down on wilson was magic 

Pickett - Bambi in lights - too much hype  forget the speccy and the bump - kick a goal or three 

Smith - stuck to task- omg - he’s lost and has no way out ❌

Lever - limited skills exposed-oops - did you say we gave up TWO FIRST ROUND PICKS AND PAY $600k A YEAR  - FFS 

Updated with colour !

 

Thank god for Rivers a great young player

Brayshaw and Harmes : did not turn up.

Oliver & Viney : too many ineffective stats

Trac : trying too hard.

OMac: allowed Walters too much latitude.

TMac: missed the plane.

2 hours ago, dimmy said:

OMac: allowed Walters too much latitude.

#1 scapegoat status confirmed when you get blamed without playing


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: Hawthorn

    The Demons return to the MCG to take on the High Flying Hawks on Saturday Afternoon. Hawthorn will be aiming to consolidate a position in the Top 4 whilst the Dees will be looking to take a scalp and make it four wins in a row. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 15 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: West Coast

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 5th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse the Demons 3rd win row for the season against the Eagles.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: West Coast

    Following a disastrous 0–5 start to the season, the Demons have now made it three wins in a row, cruising past a lacklustre West Coast side on their own turf. Skipper Max Gawn was once again at his dominant best, delivering another ruck masterclass to lead the way.

    • 115 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: West Coast

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year from Jake Bowey in 2nd place. Christian Petracca, Ed Langdon and Clayton Oliver round out the Top 5. Your votes for the win over the West Coast Eagles in Perth. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 23 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: West Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons have a chance to notch up their third consecutive win — something they haven’t done since Round 5, 2024. But to do it, they’ll need to exorcise the Demons of last year’s disastrous trip out West. Can the Dees continue their momentum, right the wrongs of that fateful clash, and take another step up the ladder on the road to redemption?

      • Sad
    • 669 replies
    Demonland
  • FEATURE: 1925

    ï»żA hundred years ago today, on 2 May 1925, Melbourne kicked off the new season with a 47 point victory over St Kilda to take top place on the VFL ladder after the opening round of the new season.  Top place was a relatively unknown position for the team then known as the “Fuchsias.” They had finished last in 1923 and rose by only one place in the following year although the final home and away round heralded a promise of things to come when they surprised the eventual premiers Essendon. That victory set the stage for more improvement and it came rapidly. In this series, I will tell the story of how the 1925 season unfolded for the Melbourne Football Club and how it made the VFL finals for the first time in a decade on the way to the ultimate triumph a year later.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland