Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I donโ€™t want to remember it

The Dorks

ย 

The whole thing was a disgrace.ย 

17 minutes ago, dl4e said:

The whole thing was a disgrace.ย 

Goes to show that our Mfc Boards had little idea how to grow the cub,ย  because they were all inside the old-club thinking,ย  that we were the MCGclub,ย  and that was all we were.ย ย  Beholden to the 'G' and to handouts,ย  because of this.

Even later with Diamond Joe,ย  we still couldn't decide what,ย  and/or where we could be based. Caulfield or where.?

ย 

The Bentleigh club facilities would have been fantastic if located at the Gosch's paddock ovals.

 

5 minutes ago, MyFavouriteMartian said:

ย 

Is this Ohio usa - David's jacket.?

jeff-kennett2-jpg.706889

Oh god, I canโ€™t un-see that now

Edited by Deemented Are Go!

6 hours ago, Demonland said:

Had the merger gone ahead do you think we would have had the ultimate success?

If we would have had Luke Hodge and Buddy Franklin then yes. Although first we need Croad to trade to Freo.

Edited by John Demonic

7 minutes ago, Deemented Are Go! said:

Oh god, I canโ€™t un-see that now

HaHa.ย  I know exactly what you mean.ย  Stark isn't he.

Aren't we lucky,ย  Re Don Scott.ย ย  We ought congratulate him...ย ย  and get him a Knighthood at theย  Queen E's pleasure,ย  before she caves.

ย 
10 minutes ago, MyFavouriteMartian said:

HaHa.ย  I know exactly what you mean.ย  Stark isn't he.

Aren't we lucky,ย  Re Don Scott.ย ย  We ought congratulate him...ย ย  and get him a Knighthood at theย  Queen E's pleasure,ย  before she caves.

And condemn those who railroaded us members with their proxy votes and rigged system (Dallas Brooks hall being far too small for starters)

Ridley was at the helm too which made the whole fiasco even harder to understand.

A Demon great who probably should have stepped aside to let others try and make a go of it.ย  As it was,ย  he was eventually replaced and we did make a go of it.

And we're still here.ย 

7 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

You have to remember that it was an MFC lead merger where Hawks were the target club.It is reasonable to think we would have had the usual suspects leading the club and we would have been the basket case we are anyway. (MFCSS requires no other response.)

ย 

Exactly.ย  I thought the merger was a no-brainer to be honest, and history has and will prove this correct from an MFC perspective.ย  The only issue I ever had was that it would have been the MFC 'we know best mob' that would have moved forward making the same rubbish amateur decisions and hence contaminating any brown and gold.ย  The real winner really was Hawthorn.ย  They should thank Donald Scott every minute of the every day.ย  Legend status is understating his input to that club, on-field, on the board, and stopping the merger.

ย 

Interesting to note in the latest Newman/Sheahan/Scott, podcast that Kennett was serious with the Melbourne Presidency.ย  He wanted the "mother of all challenges" and his parents were Melbourne supporters.


18 minutes ago, Macca said:

And condemn those who railroaded us members with their proxy votes and rigged system (Dallas Brooks hall being far too small for starters)

Ridley was at the helm too which made the whole fiasco even harder to understand.

A Demon great who probably should have stepped aside to let others try and make a go of it.ย  As it was,ย  he was eventually replaced and we did make a go of it.

And we're still here.ย 

Our failure is inward thinking,ย  imv.

Just thinking inside the square and inside the parameters that has always been at the Mfc.ย  This is why we have mfcss.

ย 

Our club has to get free of theย  'G'.ย  And build our home base.ย  Our own HQ,ย  for the training, offices,ย  and for the supporters,ย  to know and feel at home, and feel they belong.... This = Identity.

Its a big part of what we lack.

And it would be ours for all important events,ย  including those Dallas Brooks Hall type meetings etc.ย  Which grow to form the history and the fabric of the club.

It's where our historical Photos would be,ย  our Premiership cups would be,ย  and our,ย  hopefully,ย  Boards would meet.ย 

This in-turn would alter the style of the Boards,ย  and would hope we would become a bit moreย  'Footy Savvy',ย  from this change of address.ย 

The stuffiness would get a breath of fresh airing.

ย 

I believe this would make us more attractive to a wider group of footy minded people,ย  to get on board the Dee train.

Edited by MyFavouriteMartian

5 minutes ago, MyFavouriteMartian said:

Our failure is inward thinking,ย  imv.

Just thinking inside the square and inside the parameters that has always been at the Mfc.ย  This is why we have mfcss.

ย 

Our club has to get free of theย  'G'.ย  And build our home base.ย  Our own HQ,ย  for the training, offices,ย  and for the supporters,ย  to know and feel at home, and feel they belong.... This = Identity.

Its a big part of what we lack.

And it would be ours for all important events,ย  including those Dallas Brooks Hall type meetings etc.ย  Which grow to form the history and the fabric of the club.

It's where our historical Photos would be,ย  our Premiership cups would be,ย  and our,ย  hopefully,ย  Boards would meet.ย 

This in-turn would alter the style of the Boards,ย  and would hope we would become a bit moreย  'Footy Savvy',ย  from this change of address.ย 

The stuffiness would get a breath of fresh airing.

ย 

I believe this would make us more attractive to a wider group of footy minded people,ย  to get on board the Dee train.

Perhaps we just need to win more games dl.

Financially we've posted up profit's in 11 of the last 13 seasons.ย  With 1 finals appearance in that same time frame.

But to win more games we need to excel at list building.ย  And to be honest,ย  we've been amateurish at list building for long periods of time (from the Smith years until when Barassi took over and from about 2004 (or thereabouts) through to when Roos took over)

The latest bout of poor list building still lingers ... we have a dearth of hard-nosed experienced & talented players (late 20's) who can lead by example and show the way.

In 3 or 4 years the current early to mid 20's group (that have talent) will be in their late 20's.ย  And if we continue to recruit well we'll end up with a more balanced list that can contend.

All the rest of it falls into place if we're run well from the top.

39 minutes ago, Macca said:

And condemn those who railroaded us members with their proxy votes and rigged system (Dallas Brooks hall being far too small for starters)

Ridley was at the helm too which made the whole fiasco even harder to understand.

A Demon great who probably should have stepped aside to let others try and make a go of it.ย  As it was,ย  he was eventually replaced and we did make a go of it.

And we're still here.ย 

It was Hassa Mann and Billy Guest who was driving the merger, Ian Ridley was very concerned By the whole process. I had many conversations with him regarding it and he use to ring me regarding the thoughts and feelings amongst the Redlegs members group.

5 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

It was Hassa Mann and Billy Guest who was driving the merger, Ian Ridley was very concerned By the whole process. I had many conversations with him regarding it and he use to ring me regarding the thoughts and feelings amongst the Redlegs members group.

I remember Ridley being quite vocal and passionate about the merger.ย  He was all-in on it.

So why would he have a public persona of being the front man of the merger yet have doubts about it and the process?

Doesn't make sense.ย 

4 minutes ago, Macca said:

I remember Ridley being quite vocal and passionate about the merger.ย  He was all-in on it.

So why would he have a public persona of being the front man of the merger yet have doubts about it and the process?

Doesn't make sense.ย 

I am only telling you what I know of the situation and I do not recall him being vocal about it.


Just now, drysdale demon said:

I am only telling you what I know of the situation and I do not recall him being vocal about it.

Ridley was the front man of the merger

And he was quite vocal about it all.ย  Passionate in fact.ย 

You've either got a poor memory or you are talking rot.

ย 

2 minutes ago, Macca said:

Ridley was the front man of the merger

And he was quite vocal about it all.ย  Passionate in fact.ย 

You've either got a poor memory or you are talking rot.

ย 

Not talking rot, as I said Mann and Guest were the main culprits, in the conversations I had with Ridley he was very concerned for the members. I don't really care what you think of that.

5 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Ridley was driving the Merger

I remember the Phone calls from the Club...

No he wasn't. Did you have any conversations with Ridley?

23 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

No he wasn't. Did you have any conversations with Ridley?

Read his book mate, it's called "Urge to Merge"


23 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

No he wasn't. Did you have any conversations with Ridley?

Have a look at any of the News Footage of the day.ย 
Tiger was Front and Centre. I will bet you a Few $100 on that one dry

i cut many of the ABC News Stories that year on the Merger

The Club rang me at least 3 times over the 96 season to try and get me to voteย for a Merger

Bill Guest is a disgraceย 

Ridley was very much pro-merger. I remember loadsย of vision of him urging members to support it. No doubt about that.

3 hours ago, Moonshadow said:

Ridley was very much pro-merger. I remember loadsย of vision of him urging members to support it. No doubt about that.

At Dallas Brooks Ridley was strident in his demand that there be a merger. Bill Guest and "the suits"

ย had the numbers and were arrogant and dismissive in their confidence.

Brian Dixon and Joe Gutnick had the passion and the simple response to Ridleys comment that the board had tried to get support from everyone. The simple line "you didn't ask me" and his presentation of a plan completely blind sided the board and the overflowing crowd were rapturous in their support.ย 

Ridley had the numbers and won the night but lost the fight. This meeting established divisions that soured the club for years and created an impression that was often displayed on the field. Confusion and disconnect were traits that have been carried on to this date.

We need to acknowledge this blight and spur the current generation to display the best attributes of a united cohesive club that will reap the success it deserves.

ย 
11 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Can anyone recall the money offer from AFL for a merged team?ย 

6 million

11 hours ago, TGR said:

Interesting to note in the latest Newman/Sheahan/Scott, podcast that Kennett was serious with the Melbourne Presidency.ย  He wanted the "mother of all challenges" and his parents were Melbourne supporters.

I often wonder how Kennett wouldโ€™ve gone as MFC president if the AFL gave it the green light.

During 2013 we were an absolute basket case and things couldnโ€™t get any worse for us.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demonsโ€™ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 62 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last yearโ€™s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Clubโ€™s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.ย Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Letโ€™s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the teamโ€™s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and โ€ฆ it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterdayโ€™s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourneโ€™s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldnโ€™t get any worse. Well, it did. And whatโ€™s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasnโ€™t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyonโ€™s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourneโ€™s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourneโ€™s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterdayโ€™s 7 goals 21 behinds.ย 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. Iโ€™ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?ย Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?ย 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 301 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies