Jump to content

Gawn: Jackson "already better than me"

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, Accepting Mediocrity said:

 

Pretty much spot on I reckon. His other traits are great - he's a fierce tackler for a tall bloke, is good below his knees, hurts people, and he's a great kick. You can see he works his [censored] off - he does a lot right, but doesn't have a lot to show for it stats-wise. If it clicks, we'll have an absolute weapon on our hands. No doubt contested marking is a hard thing to drastically improve, but it's worth remembering that Gawn couldn't take a grab to save himself for the first 6 years of his career. Hawkins pretty much the same. I hold hope. 

Marking is sometimes about confidence, as well as a number of other factors of course, but it can only take a couple of good grabs, if it is a confidence issue, to turn it around. 
We have seen the key forwards who need that early goal to then have a good day, with our game’s record holder the perfect example.

 

  • Quote
    •  
     

    It would seem that with our inside-50s still a bit wonky (unless Melksham or Bailey 'Coleman' Fritsch have it) it does make sense to have a tall target with that particular strength of following up immediately and instinctively when they haven't had a clean win of the ball.

    It is almost like Jackson comes from the other direction to most young key forwards - usually they are so used to being the overdeveloped gorilla clunking marks against the mostly regular-sized teenagers that they get a bit slack on the chasing and scrambling.

    Jackson hasn't had that particular kind of dominance so has never had the chance to become complacent.  It'll be quite something to see, if he successfully puts on a bit more adult muscle and begins getting the contested marks as well...

    Okay, lid back on.  I merely anticipate a respectable season playing a useful role where his particular strengths may help mitigate our greatest weakness.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    7 hours ago, jnrmac said:

    I have gone from being optimistic on Weid to being slightly pessimistic. Have seen some glimpses but one area of real concern for me is his inability to regularly hold marks.

    Fix that and he has the potential to become a good player but I'm not sure you can fix such a problem that easily.

    He should try wearing a glove. Give Brad Miller a call Sammy.

    Edited by John Demonic

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    6 hours ago, Redleg said:

    That is clearly his achilles heel.

    He is a nice kick and battled manfully as a chop out ruckman.

    However, he does drop far too many marking chances and I agree, that unless he fixes that he has little chance of being a long term key forward.

    Key forwards take marks.

    Maybe we could try him in defense?

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    LJ can certainly play as we have seen in the pre season games . If the match committee think that they have a spot for him to help the team cause then he will play. I think it is early however he can be managed.

    Remember J Watts was another that in a way had pressure on him to perform and we know the history.  IMO   LJ will make an inpact when he is given the chance but he would have to earn it not just given to him.  

  • Quote
    •  
    12 hours ago, Accepting Mediocrity said:

     

    Pretty much spot on I reckon. His other traits are great - he's a fierce tackler for a tall bloke, is good below his knees, hurts people, and he's a great kick. You can see he works his [censored] off - he does a lot right, but doesn't have a lot to show for it stats-wise. If it clicks, we'll have an absolute weapon on our hands. No doubt contested marking is a hard thing to drastically improve, but it's worth remembering that Gawn couldn't take a grab to save himself for the first 6 years of his career. Hawkins pretty much the same. I hold hope. 

    Perfect summary, I understand the frustration of other posters though.

  • Quote

    Weideman has played 21 games over the last two years and has taken 86 marks, 34 of them contested.

    Only Gawn takes significantly more contested marks per game at Melbourne over that period and would have far more opportunities as a ruck than Weideman as predominantly a forward, although my recollection is Weideman does take many of his out on the wing and not deep forward. Weideman is taking a comparable number of contested marks per game to Tom McDonald, Jack Riewoldt, Charlie Dixon, Ben Brown etc.

    Yes he spills some he really should take, but he actually takes quite a few and I don’t think that’s the main problem. I think his tendency to go missing for impact for long periods of the game is the bigger concern. Too many games with six or seven disposals.

    Weideman is a better “for now” as ruck or forward over Jackson in ability in an individual tap out or marking contest as you’d expect for someone four years older, but there are options where Jackson can contribute that Weideman just can’t with Jackson’s far superior versatility through his agility.

    For what it’s worth I would play Weideman over Jackson and let Jackson develop in the VFL. If Weideman is not effective enough at AFL level after round 3 or so and Jackson is doing OK at VFL level then they could be swapped. Jackson in theory could come in to replace any number of players because of his agility and below knees ability so it’s also not as simple as Jackson vs. Weideman.

  • Quote
    • Like 8

    • Our forward set up and plan is so disfunctionalJC would struggle.Wr need stay at home (Fritta) CONTACTOR (TMac) leading Weid) and some
    • E smalls and opportunists. Until we get the structure right and have players play to that structure we will struggle. Our forward are poorly coached and completely dysfunctional
    •  
  • Quote

    What a pleasant change to have a constructive conversation about 2 up and coming young talls.....

     

    Give yourselves a pat on the back..

  • Quote
    14 hours ago, John Demonic said:

    He should try wearing a glove. Give Brad Miller a call Sammy.

    I like this idea.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    On 3/12/2020 at 2:21 PM, Accepting Mediocrity said:

    How many rucks/ tall forwards can you name that have dominated in their first season? The rare ones that look good from day 1 are man-children (Hogan, Darling). Barring injury, Jackson will play senior footy this year, but he's at least 2 years away from being an above-average AFL player (assuming he makes it). 

    Weideman was one of the biggest disappointments of 2019 (and that's saying something). But he's well ahead of Jackson at this stage and deserves first crack.

    Weed has to have first crack at the 2nd Ruck/Forward roll no doubt, this could be a blessing for weed, he now knows he has to perform in this role or a player who is just as good, if not better than himself will lay claims to this position and not let go.

    #Timetostepupweed

    Edited by Win4theAges

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    12 hours ago, Lampers said:

    Weideman has played 21 games over the last two years and has taken 86 marks, 34 of them contested.

    Only Gawn takes significantly more contested marks per game at Melbourne over that period and would have far more opportunities as a ruck than Weideman as predominantly a forward, although my recollection is Weideman does take many of his out on the wing and not deep forward. Weideman is taking a comparable number of contested marks per game to Tom McDonald, Jack Riewoldt, Charlie Dixon, Ben Brown etc.

    That makes sense that Weide takes more high marks out in the wider part of the ground at this stage,  as his body develops.

    Only natural that he will get buffeted about,  when playing deeper and inside pack situations.

    weight >>>- https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/tp-melbourne-demons?year=2020&sby=8

    I think 'LJ' would just get blocked from his run at the ball, anyway.

    Edited by MyFavouriteMartian

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • 34 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • 242 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Thanks
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All