Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Colm said:

Yeah agree with this, surprised there hasn’t been more talk linking him with us as on paper he sounds like just what we need and has been rated higher than Pickett in all the draft articles. Might go a bit earlier than 28 though. 

Anybody got any info on him?

More a medium sized half forward vs the likes of Weightman & Henry.  A bit like Jeffy build wise so possibly more options in the air and playing off a wing at some stage down the track with a tank behind him.

Has some tricks and major evasive skills / agility (2nd in the combine just behind Young) and LOVES a goal either side with little time or space when given the ball.  6 goals in 4 matches in the Nats is probably right up there with the best outputs in the carnival.

Downsides:  Not as consistent at this point (off the ball outside of goal scoring where he seems elite) as say a Henry or Weightman and the attack/pressure/2nd effort side appears to need a fair amount of work to get to the likes of those two.  The good is very very good when going though and i reckon he could end up being Jeffy (cat) like around goals even with limited opportunites.

Would happily take him from 15ish onwards on a needs basis and he is exactly what we need.  Fits the potential ideal Jeffy replacement 'project player' bill perfectly.

https://m.afl.com.au/draft/prospects

https://afl.draftcentral.com.au/player/elijah-taylor/

According to Twomey the Hawks are supposedly attempting to trade up their 2nd pick somehow to try and snag him, interviewing him last week...(tweet from Twomey below)...

..."Elijah Taylor one of the mysteries of the draft. Hawthorn has shown real interest recently, interviewing him last week. The hugely talented forward is not for pick No.11 but their next picks get used on Finn Maginness. Is Taylor in their sights if they get another top-20 pick?"...

Edited by Rusty Nails

 
43 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

More a medium sized half forward vs the likes of Weightman & Henry.  A bit like Jeffy build wise so possibly more options in the air and playing off a wing at some stage down the track with a tank behind him.

Has some tricks and major evasive skills / agility (2nd in the combine just behind Young) and LOVES a goal either side with little time or space when given the ball.  6 goals in 4 matches in the Nats is probably right up there with the best outputs in the carnival.

Downsides:  Not as consistent at this point (off the ball outside of goal scoring where he seems elite) as say a Henry or Weightman and the attack/pressure/2nd effort side appears to need a fair amount of work to get to the likes of those two.  The good is very very good when going though and i reckon he could end up being Jeffy (cat) like around goals even with limited opportunites.

Would happily take him from 15ish onwards on a needs basis and he is exactly what we need.  Fits the potential ideal Jeffy replacement 'project player' bill perfectly.

https://m.afl.com.au/draft/prospects

https://afl.draftcentral.com.au/player/elijah-taylor/

According to Twomey the Hawks are supposedly attempting to trade up their 2nd pick somehow to try and snag him, interviewing him last week...(tweet from Twomey below)...

..."Elijah Taylor one of the mysteries of the draft. Hawthorn has shown real interest recently, interviewing him last week. The hugely talented forward is not for pick No.11 but their next picks get used on Finn Maginness. Is Taylor in their sights if they get another top-20 pick?"...

Thanks RN great summary and sounds like a very good option for us if we miss out Pickett and Weightman but we may still need to do some sort of split that improves pick 28 to do it. I heard yesterday that Adelaide has been approached for their picks in the early 20s. Perhaps the Hawks. 

Jeez I hope hawks don’t get a gun at 11, Maginness as f/s and Taylor on top of that. 

I didn’t fancy a split with Gold Coast all along but 15&20 are starting to look very tempting. Going of recent phantoms that would get us Kemp or Robertson at 15 and then get one of Picket, Weightman or Taylor at 20. 

Edited by Colm

45 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

More a medium sized half forward vs the likes of Weightman & Henry.  A bit like Jeffy build wise so possibly more options in the air and playing off a wing at some stage down the track with a tank behind him.

Has some tricks and major evasive skills / agility (2nd in the combine just behind Young) and LOVES a goal either side with little time or space when given the ball.  6 goals in 4 matches in the Nats is probably right up there with the best outputs in the carnival.

Downsides:  Not as consistent at this point (off the ball outside of goal scoring where he seems elite) as say a Henry or Weightman and the attack/pressure/2nd effort side appears to need a fair amount of work to get to the likes of those two.  The good is very very good when going though and i reckon he could end up being Jeffy (cat) like around goals even with limited opportunites.

Would happily take him from 15ish onwards on a needs basis and he is exactly what we need.  Fits the potential ideal Jeffy replacement 'project player' bill perfectly.

https://m.afl.com.au/draft/prospects

https://afl.draftcentral.com.au/player/elijah-taylor/

According to Twomey the Hawks are supposedly attempting to trade up their 2nd pick somehow to try and snag him, interviewing him last week...(tweet from Twomey below)...

..."Elijah Taylor one of the mysteries of the draft. Hawthorn has shown real interest recently, interviewing him last week. The hugely talented forward is not for pick No.11 but their next picks get used on Finn Maginness. Is Taylor in their sights if they get another top-20 pick?"...

i wonder if that means that the hawks have locked in that we are taking Pickett. and if we did trade 10 and 28 for a few picks in the teens that they'd take Pickett over Taylor..?

 

I'll be looking for a medium forward especially of we go Picket at 10 and not Weightman. All of the following are predicted around pick 28.

Elijay Taylor

Cameron Taheny

Dylan Williams

Hugo Ralphsmith

11 hours ago, Colm said:

Thanks RN great summary and sounds like a very good option for us if we miss out Pickett and Weightman but we may still need to do some sort of split that improves pick 28 to do it. I heard yesterday that Adelaide has been approached for their picks in the early 20s. Perhaps the Hawks. 

Jeez I hope hawks don’t get a gun at 11, Maginness as f/s and Taylor on top of that. 

I didn’t fancy a split with Gold Coast all along but 15&20 are starting to look very tempting. Going of recent phantoms that would get us Kemp or Robertson at 15 and then get one of Picket, Weightman or Taylor at 20. 

Still a slim chance for Roberston or Taylor at 28 Colm!

Edited by Rusty Nails


11 hours ago, Rocky said:

i wonder if that means that the hawks have locked in that we are taking Pickett. and if we did trade 10 and 28 for a few picks in the teens that they'd take Pickett over Taylor..?

Well Kozzy is ours Rocky.  We are still in the mix to land plenty of talent that will go in the 20s.

Roberston, Schoenburg, Taylor, Williams etc

One of Robertson, Taylor, Rivers, Schoenberg, Gould, Williams would be great. That’s order of preference also I reckon. 

Edited by Lord Travis

16 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

Still a slim chance for Roberston at 28 Colm!

There’s been a few bolters so hopefully this gives us a crack at a player we really want. Think Robertson will be gone way before then( prob next pick) but more confident know that we can still pick up a really handy player at 28. Fingers crossed Taylor still there  

 

Edited by Colm

 

Are there options for us to trade up the order overnight?

 

Oh [censored] Bianco, Worrel and Sharp all still there too!

That’s Robertson, Taylor, Gould, Rivers, Sharp, Bianco, Worrel, Schoenberg, Williams all still there. Pick 28 could turn out to be a ripper for us! Exciting!!!


Now pick 30, probably moves to 31 and effectively pick 9 of the second night.

10 names:

Mids: Robertson, Sharp, Schoenberg, Ralphsmith, Rantall

Backs: Worrell, Bianco, Rivers, Gould, Perez

Forwards: Taylor, Williams, Mahoney

Seven picks ahead of our next choice, assuming no academy matches/pick swap 'funny business' deals. 

Should still be some quality there for us.  I reckon we've had a very good trade and draft period this year.

2 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Oh [censored] Bianco, Worrel and Sharp all still there too!

That’s Robertson, Taylor, Gould, Rivers, Sharp, Bianco, Worrel, Schoenberg, Williams all still there. Pick 28 could turn out to be a ripper for us! Exciting!!!

7 picks before us yeah?! That is an exciting list to pick from and going by the couple of bolters at end of round 1 you would think there will be another few bolters before our pick. 

15 hours ago, Skuit said:

We need an Elijah Taylor thread. Although Taylor picking Taylor might be a bit too Inception for some. 

Inception?  Incestuous? 

14 hours ago, JakovichScissorKick said:

I just checked AFL.com to see what time the draft starts and  apparently its held over 2  [censored] nights  ....  only Round 1 is tonight FFS

The AFL is run by complete lunatics

Just too true ..... absolute morons.


Wish we had some ammo to move up to grab jacksons mate Robertson 

3 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Inception?  Incestuous? 

Just too true ..... absolute morons.

At least they didn't announce the top 10 in reverse order this time.

17 minutes ago, PaulRB said:

Are there options for us to trade up the order overnight?

 

I think the only thing we are allowed to do is trade a future 4th round pick to move up. 30 and a future 4th to Sydney for 27 - gives them some bonus academy picks for next year? I don't think they are accepting that.

30 and a future 4th to North for 28? If they know who we are taking they'll do that given they have 29. But probably isn't worth it.

Come on demenlanders give us a scenario to move up to our pick to brissys pick , apparently port dont want Robertson 

Edited by Paulo

38 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Now pick 30, probably moves to 31 and effectively pick 9 of the second night.

10 names:

Mids: Robertson, Sharp, Schoenberg, Ralphsmith, Rantall

Backs: Worrell, Bianco, Rivers, Gould, Perez

Forwards: Taylor, Williams, Mahoney

As long as we don’t do anything outrageous, we are in a very good spot. Could tick off a bunch of needs in one draft. One of Rivers, Gould, Sharp, Taylor, Bianco or Williams would make me very happy.

And not an unrealistic chance that we’ll get to choose one either.


39 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Oh [censored] Bianco, Worrel and Sharp all still there too!

That’s Robertson, Taylor, Gould, Rivers, Sharp, Bianco, Worrel, Schoenberg, Williams all still there. Pick 28 could turn out to be a ripper for us! Exciting!!!

 

37 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Now pick 30, probably moves to 31 and effectively pick 9 of the second night.

10 names:

Mids: Robertson, Sharp, Schoenberg, Ralphsmith, Rantall

Backs: Worrell, Bianco, Rivers, Gould, Perez

Forwards: Taylor, Williams, Mahoney

 

34 minutes ago, nacnud said:

Honestly keen for us to draft Cahill just cause he is a mate of mine hahaha

Don't laugh he does some very solid work.... most of it at.ground level but i guess that's what many small forwards do.

Forgot about the likes of Gould & Bianco also.  Looks like a nice bonus ahead...fingers crossed.

2 minutes ago, ChaserJ said:

As long as we don’t do anything outrageous, we are in a very good spot. Could tick off a bunch of needs in one draft. One of Rivers, Gould, Sharp, Taylor, Bianco or Williams would make me very happy.

And not an unrealistic chance that we’ll get to choose one either.

I'm a Rivers fan, just seems so solid and I think our backline needs versatile that all round quality type who can play any of about 5 roles back there. I'm also interested in the idea of taking Williams and making him play half back to light a fire under him, very Sicily/Hardwick at Hawthorn like.

Otherwise if they want to go Taylor that's fine by me. Same with Sharp, Gould, Bianco, although those 3 are kind of positives and negatives with attributes, less versatile.

The only one who I haven't seen but I'm just fascinated by is the idea of Perez. A junior soccer star with elite kicking skills. Have you seen much of him J? 

Keep on sliding, Gould. Would be rapt with him at our next pick.

 

A potential mock could be 

22 Port - Trent Bianco

23 Lions - Josh Worrell

24 Crows Deven Robertson 
25 Crows Will Gould 

26 Cats  Trent Rivers

27 Swans Elijah Taylor 

28 kangas Jay Rantall 

29 kangas Hugo Ralphsmith 

30 Dees Jeremy Sharp 

 

 

 

Given the player we have brought in during the trade and draft period I suppose you could make a strong case for us  bringing in the player with best kicking skills at 28. Thoughts!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies