Jump to content

Featured Replies

I really want this guy

We will miss him now we don't have pick 8

The other gun is Devon Robertson

Its very hard to determine the demons strategy

Will have to wait and see

 
15 minutes ago, Kent said:

I really want this guy

We will miss him now we don't have pick 8

The other gun is Devon Robertson

Its very hard to determine the demons strategy

Will have to wait and see

Yep - will be very disappointed if we miss him between 8 and 10.

I have confidence in Taylor... but I have a feeling we may be missing out on a very good player here.

 

I really am sick of this thread.

Get over it... The MFC will not want at pick 3 or pick 10 a player who cannot play for twelve months.

If you want to start taking bets at whether MFC will take this guy then I am on for $1,000 to say NO WAY.

Edited by Ohio USA - David

 
21 minutes ago, Ohio USA - David said:

I really am sick of this thread.

Get over it... The MFC will not want at pick 3 or pick 10 a player who cannot play for twelve months.

If you want to start taking bets at whether MFC will take this guy then I am on for $1,000 to say NO WAY.

Do I have to travel to Ohio to collect on the bet?

36 minutes ago, Ohio USA - David said:

I really am sick of this thread.

Get over it... The MFC will not want at pick 3 or pick 10 a player who cannot play for twelve months.

If you want to start taking bets at whether MFC will take this guy then I am on for $1,000 to say NO WAY.

If you don't like the thread then GTFO


1 hour ago, Ohio USA - David said:

I really am sick of this thread.

Get over it... The MFC will not want at pick 3 or pick 10 a player who cannot play for twelve months.

If you want to start taking bets at whether MFC will take this guy then I am on for $1,000 to say NO WAY.

image.png.a8b8533979241d22f9c44725af1bc5c3.png

1 hour ago, Ohio USA - David said:

I really am sick of this thread.

Get over it... The MFC will not want at pick 3 or pick 10 a player who cannot play for twelve months.

If you want to start taking bets at whether MFC will take this guy then I am on for $1,000 to say NO WAY.

I'm not sure whether we'll pick him or not. Taylor does rate him highly, he said so in the Road to the Draft interview.

If we think he'll be the best long term prospect at our pick then we'll take him and the fact that he won't play next year is irrelevant.

26 minutes ago, Fifty-5 said:

I'm not sure whether we'll pick him or not. Taylor does rate him highly, he said so in the Road to the Draft interview.

If we think he'll be the best long term prospect at our pick then we'll take him and the fact that he won't play next year is irrelevant.

Particularly as we'll most likely have a plug and play in Green or Jackson at 3. It enables us to select best available at 10.

 

14 hours ago, Ohio USA - David said:

 

Get over it... The MFC will not want at pick 3 or pick 10 a player who cannot play for twelve months.

 

You mean like taking Jesse Hogan at pick 2 who couldn’t play for a year and no that was before his back surgery injury.

Edited by Redleg

16 hours ago, Ohio USA - David said:

I really am sick of this thread.

Get over it... The MFC will not want at pick 3 or pick 10 a player who cannot play for twelve months.

If you want to start taking bets at whether MFC will take this guy then I am on for $1,000 to say NO WAY.

 

2 hours ago, Ohio USA - David said:

how arrogant you are...

. . . 

We have to take a chance on getting Kemp , he will be a champion. What is interesting is some people views that we shouldn't touch broken merchandise . Net Fyfe so long ago Fyfe and Bontempelli missed a fair chunck of football and yet Fyfe won a brownlow medal and the Bont had a good year.

Missing a year as an 18 year old is nothing. It just means he gets a proper grounding in our game and builds his body up before he plays. It's what shouls happen with all new draftees.

This guy looms as the massive steal of the draft. i reckon he'd be a top 3 pick if not for his injury. 

and of all the teams we're probably in the best position to draft someone like that as we don't need the immediate impact quite as much.


19 hours ago, Redleg said:

You mean like taking Jesse Hogan at pick 2 who couldn’t play for a year and no that was before his back surgery injury.

And the voice of experience 

2 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

And the voice of experience 

Not sure if you are agreeing with me or disagreeing.

I was pointing out to the poster that we can and have picked players who won’t play straight away.

16 hours ago, Redleg said:

Not sure if you are agreeing with me or disagreeing.

I was pointing out to the poster that we can and have picked players who won’t play straight away.

Or was that the name of your radio segment Red?

1 minute ago, In Harmes Way said:

Or was that the name of your radio segment Red?

Sorry you have lost me, what does that mean? What was the name of the radio segment you are suggesting?

58 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Sorry you have lost me, what does that mean? What was the name of the radio segment you are suggesting?

The old one you did with WJ


7 hours ago, In Harmes Way said:

The old one you did with WJ

It was the Super Summer Sports  Show.

On 10/25/2019 at 7:25 PM, JakovichScissorKick said:

 

Kemp wont make it to pick 8

Wrong. He made it to 17

 

Urgh. Anyone but Carlton. He's going to be a gun I reckon.

53 minutes ago, A F said:

Urgh. Anyone but Carlton. He's going to be a gun I reckon.

Yes,  Some much needed help for Cripps.   Blues did very well.   It could have been worse,  he could have gone to Geelong the pick before.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies