Jump to content

Draft Needs Analysis

Whispering_Jack
Whispering_Jack
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

Chris Doerre (aka Knightmare) has done an interesting draft needs analysis for ESPN - 

AFL Draft: Your club's list needs

Here's his analysis for the MFC -

List needs

1. Classy inside midfielder

2. General forward

3. Relieving ruck

Draft picks: 23, 28, 54, 62, 91

Who should they draft? As a medium marking forward, Sam Sturt would be a strong addition to Melbourne's front half at 23. Bailey Williams at 28 would be ideal as a relieving ruckman who has uncontainable athleticism as a marking forward. If one of the Demons' preferred choices in the 20s is unavailable, midfielder Sydney Stack would add further class to the club's engine room. Through their NGA, Toby Bedford will provide speed and pressure through the midfield and up forward.

  • Quote
    • Thanks 2
     

    We don't need any of those really. speed on the outside and small forwards is what we need.

  • Quote
    • Haha 1

    1. Classy outside midfielder

    2. Classy outside midfielder

    3. Project ruck

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    i agree, i think we need another forward and another good midfielder..but the moment you get caught uo going for needs then its a big risk. 

    I don't want to pick up a farren ray or a kane tenace  for outside speed just because we already have some good inside mids.

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    1 hour ago, Whispering_Jack said:

    Chris Doerre (aka Knightmare) has done an interesting draft needs analysis for ESPN - 

    AFL Draft: Your club's list needs

    Here's his analysis for the MFC -

    List needs

    1. Classy inside midfielder

    2. General forward

    3. Relieving ruck

    Draft picks: 23, 28, 54, 62, 91

    Who should they draft? As a medium marking forward, Sam Sturt would be a strong addition to Melbourne's front half at 23. Bailey Williams at 28 would be ideal as a relieving ruckman who has uncontainable athleticism as a marking forward. If one of the Demons' preferred choices in the 20s is unavailable, midfielder Sydney Stack would add further class to the club's engine room. Through their NGA, Toby Bedford will provide speed and pressure through the midfield and up forward.

    I agree with "knightmare". 

    - Our needs are a classy inside mid with speed... to replace Tyson, with the aspects he lacked.   Another Salem or better?

    - next would be similar, another running mid with balance and speed.  no one-dimension mids please... they should all be able to play thru the inside and the wing.

    - a tall forward/ruck, project player.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    40 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

    We don't need any of those really. speed on the outside and small forwards is what we need.

    We already have that type, Garlett... that's enough.

     

  • Quote
    1 minute ago, DV8 said:

    We already have that type, Garlett... that's enough.

     

    I reckon we've just about written him off, and who's the next cab off the rank?

    Similar problem with lack of depth up the other end, I think - who replaces Jetta?

    Edited by Rogue

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1

    We've been here before....

    You don't draft for needs.

    It's a recipe for disaster.

    Best available every day of the week.

    You can think of picking for needs but then make sure you extinguish that thought and pick best available.

    ...and that best available must be a competitive ball winner, tall, mid or small.

    If they're not then they're not best available.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 8
     
    4 minutes ago, rjay said:

    We've been here before....

    You don't draft for needs.

    It's a recipe for disaster.

    Best available every day of the week.

    You can think of picking for needs but then make sure you extinguish that thought and pick best available.

    ...and that best available must be a competitive ball winner, tall, mid or small.

    If they're not then they're not best available.

     

    No... you've been there before.  We have needs, but you do not take a player on needs alone. if they are inferior to what is about them in the draft. 

    You don't ignore real talent, at anytime.

  • Quote

    Maynard's got a brother who got injured.....

  • Quote

    40 minutes ago, rjay said:

    We've been here before....

    You don't draft for needs.

    It's a recipe for disaster.

    I don't know. You could say we filled urgent needs with many recent recruits (e.g. Oliver, Brayshaw, Petracca, VDB, Viney as hard-bodied midfielders, Weideman as a KPF, Spargo as a small pressure forward, Fritsch as a HBF/wing). How good they were was a bonus.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    45 minutes ago, rjay said:

    We've been here before....

    You don't draft for needs.

    It's a recipe for disaster.

    Best available every day of the week.

    You can think of picking for needs but then make sure you extinguish that thought and pick best available.

    ...and that best available must be a competitive ball winner, tall, mid or small.

    If they're not then they're not best available.

     

    With the club's first few picks, yes, I think you would pick 95% based purely on best available.  By the time you are getting into later picks, the perceived difference in talent, cultural fit etc probably plateaus out and that's when you'd try to pick based on needs.  Of course if you the best available at an early pick also aligns with needs, then that's the ideal scenario.

    I wouldn't be against us drafting more quality inside mids, somewhat for the purpose of evening out our age profile a bit for future years.  No doubt Jones will play that role less and less and if we have another young guy that can work himself into an inside mid role over the next 2 or 3 years, then who knows, maybe we can free up Oliver or Brayshaw to spend more time forward (particularly against lesser sides) and prolong their career a bit.

    Bradtke is probably ok as a project ruck at the moment, but I recon if there was someone we rated, we could probably use another on either the main or Rookie list.

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, DV8 said:

    We already have that type, Garlett... that's enough.

     

    Garlett is no where near enough. We need 2 small forwards Bedford and Rubock. 2 half backs Duursma and Ayton-Delaney. A half forward in Sturt. 2 wingers maybe Partington and C.Wagner and a back pocket maybe Lockhart.

  • Quote
    45 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

    Garlett is no where near enough. We need 2 small forwards Bedford and Rubock. 2 half backs Duursma and Ayton-Delaney. A half forward in Sturt. 2 wingers maybe Partington and C.Wagner and a back pocket maybe Lockhart.

    Garlett is too-much, IMO.

    I think we are after the same sort of player, apart from you seemingly wanting a specialist outside quick... and I want a Richmond style small, or winger,  with our own polish on the player.  

    Meaning one who will willingly 'go', when called for.   One with attitude. Like Spargo has.

    Agree re the half back.  We need to start to think about finding someone, to replace Hibberd in a few years time. So we need to draft now or 2019, for that.  Allowing 3 Yrs of development +/-...

     

  • Quote

    1 hour ago, mauriesy said:

    I don't know. You could say we filled urgent needs with many recent recruits (e.g. Oliver, Brayshaw, Petracca, VDB, Viney as hard-bodied midfielders, Weideman as a KPF, Spargo as a small pressure forward, Fritsch as a HBF/wing). How good they were was a bonus.

    All those picks were best available.

    The classic recent needs picks were the Saints with McCartin over Trac

    ...and us taking Toumpas.

    1 hour ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

    By the time you are getting into later picks

    When you get to the later picks it's pure hope...hope we can land one. 

    You trade in needs.

    2 hours ago, DV8 said:

    No... you've been there before.  We have needs, but you do not take a player on needs alone. if they are inferior to what is about them in the draft. 

    You don't ignore real talent, at anytime.

    Have a look at our recruiting under Prenders and you will see that WE Have been there before.

    Only a fool drafts needs.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    3 hours ago, Moonshadow said:

    1. Classy outside midfielder

    2. Classy outside midfielder

    3. Project ruck

    We have a project ruck in Bradtke. We need another experienced ruck in case Max and  Preuss go down.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    2 hours ago, mauriesy said:

    I don't know. You could say we filled urgent needs with many recent recruits (e.g. Oliver, Brayshaw, Petracca, VDB, Viney as hard-bodied midfielders, Weideman as a KPF, Spargo as a small pressure forward, Fritsch as a HBF/wing). How good they were was a bonus.

    I disagree with every example you mention and especially with the bolded part. That is flat out wrong.

    I've heard many club recruiters interviewed in the last year who state almost to a man that it's "best available" every time. A club drafting for need is doomed to fail at selection.

    For example, we knew exactly how much potential and talent Viney had, regardless of our list, and he was a steal at the pick we got him.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    1 hour ago, Redleg said:

    We have a project ruck in Bradtke. We need another experienced ruck in case Max and  Preuss go down.

    No we don't we have Weideman and McDonald. Don't need another project ruckman like King and Filipovic, Bradtke is enough.

    Edited by WERRIDEE

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    2 hours ago, rjay said:

    All those picks were best available.

    The classic recent needs picks were the Saints with McCartin over Trac

    ...and us taking Toumpas.

    When you get to the later picks it's pure hope...hope we can land one. 

    You trade in needs.

    Have a look at our recruiting under Prenders and you will see that WE Have been there before.

    Only a fool drafts needs.

    The recruit is only half the equation FJ... probably closer to 40% of the equation to making players.   The other is club culture and development coaches/footy dept' spend..

     Our past issues weren't about the recruiting methods, or the type recruits... but mostly about the club itself at the time.  Our weak soft culture, and being way to matey and cliquey, & leaders who were somewhere between Amateur & Pro's, on the mental side of the game.

    We were a sort of part time club, where most thought they were better, than they really were.  Talented yes, but woefully unprofessional, compared to the big clubs of the day.

     

    Well, cal me a fool then rj, if thats the way you think... because we have now entered the time for needs.  Hence we spent on May, and Jazza, 'nee' Kade.

    And Preust. So I guess these selection decisions were based on best alone, then ?  and not on needs.

    Edited by DV8

  • Quote

    27 minutes ago, DV8 said:

    Well, cal me a fool then rj, if thats the way you think... because we have now entered the time for needs.  Hence we spent on May, and Jazza, 'nee' Kade.

    And Preust. So I guess these selection decisions were based on best alone, then ?  and not on needs.

    You’ve missed the point. You’re referring to players we’ve traded for. This discussion is about the draft.

    Edited by Ethan Tremblay

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    53 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

    You’ve missed the point. You’re referring to players we’ve traded for. This discussion is about the draft.

    Agreed Roos and most good recruiters mantra is more or less pick best available at the draft and trade to fill in the gaps based on needs.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    3 hours ago, rjay said:

    All those picks were best available.

    The classic recent needs picks were the Saints with McCartin over Trac

    ...and us taking Toumpas.

    When you get to the later picks it's pure hope...hope we can land one. 

    You trade in needs.

    Have a look at our recruiting under Prenders and you will see that WE Have been there before.

    Only a fool drafts needs.

    I think it's a bit more than hope.  We have picked up some pretty good players with late picks and I think they would have been pretty purposefully selected.  Their is a certain amount of hit and miss at all stages of the draft.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    The article isn’t advocating that you necessarily have to draft for needs but rather, it sets out what each club needs.

    At any given time when making a decision on who to pick, the recruiters are usually presented with more than one choice of roughly equal quality and, at that point, your needs are a factor in the decision-making.

    In many cases it’s a subjective view of which one is the best player available anyway. That’s why those phantom drafts are never all exactly the same.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    8 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

    No we don't we have Weideman and McDonald. Don't need another project ruckman like King and Filipovic, Bradtke is enough.

    Read what I said. I said we need another EXPERIENCED ruck, as we have a project ruck in Bradtke and without Hogan, they shouldn’t risk injuries to Tom and Sam in the ruck, ad we are short of key forwards.

    Someone like Tom Campbell as a rookie for a couple of years, is needed until Bradtke can develop. We have lost Pedo and if Max and Preuss go down we are in trouble.

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Essendon

      As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie? 
      Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG. Unfortunately, performances like these went against the grain of what Melbourne has been producing from virtually midway through 2024 and extending right through to the present day. This is a game between two clubs who have faltered over the past couple of years because their disposal efficiency is appalling. Neither of them can hit the side of a barn door but history tells us that every once in a while such teams have their lucky days or come up against an opponent in even worse shape and hence, one of them will come up trumps in this match.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Thanks
      • 239 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Thanks
      • 16 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Thanks
      • 273 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All