Jump to content

Featured Replies

I'm happy to take the advice from others on here that have spoken to Gaff's management that it is North or WCE.

In the meantime - I can't help but think though, that his choice when he makes his announcement will be based on Hogan getting to Fremantle or not...

 
1 minute ago, Danelska said:

I'm happy to take the advice from others on here that have spoken to Gaff's management that it is North or WCE.

In the meantime - I can't help but think though, that his choice when he makes his announcement will be based on Hogan getting to Fremantle or not...

expand if you would ?

 
7 minutes ago, hells bells said:

Close the thread. Mahoney mentioned that they've been told to stop asking. WCE or North

 

8 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

expand if you would ?

Well, the first language of AFL is lying... or not airing your intentions...since when has Mahoney ever been overt when it's come to bigger names coming into the club.

Not to say he is lying of course... but as someone else said...the deals are done, the rest is theatre.

So, the vibe I have is that I can't help but think that if/when Hogan goes to Freo...Gaff will shortly announce the Dee's, as his asking price is more closely matched due to more cap $ -  if the trade to Freo fails... well, who cares really...

 

Edited by Danelska

10 minutes ago, Danelska said:

I'm happy to take the advice from others on here that have spoken to Gaff's management that it is North or WCE.

In the meantime - I can't help but think though, that his choice when he makes his announcement will be based on Hogan getting to Fremantle or not...

Peak Demonland


Just now, jnrmac said:

Peak Demonland

Is that a compliment or not? ?

10 minutes ago, Danelska said:

Is that a compliment or not? ?

On what planet would Gaff base his decision to go to North or stay at WCE based on whether Hogan goes to Freo?

5 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

On what planet would Gaff base his decision to go to North or stay at WCE based on whether Hogan goes to Freo?

cap space @jnrmac

 
38 minutes ago, Danelska said:

cap space @jnrmac

You miss the point. The two are totally unrelated.

10 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

You miss the point. The two are totally unrelated.

I’m sure I read elsewhere on here that, with Hogan going it’s frees up $ for anyone - in this case Gaff who is a FA to meet an asking price.

if this is wrong - walk me through what point I am missing

TIA

 


  • Author
1 hour ago, hells bells said:

Close the thread. Mahoney mentioned that they've been told to stop asking. WCE or North

Well not quite... His comments were: 

"We don't stop asking the question, but we've been told to stay away for a fair period of time. We're reading what you guys are reading on that."

Being told to stay away for a period of time can be construed two ways.

  1. MFC has been told time and time again to F off but are annoyingly persistent, or;
  2. MFC has been advised to take a step back and let things unfold safe in the knowledge that they're still in the picture.
3 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Well not quite... His comments were: 

"We don't stop asking the question, but we've been told to stay away for a fair period of time. We're reading what you guys are reading on that."

Being told to stay away for a period of time can be construed two ways.

  1. MFC has been told time and time again to F off but are annoyingly persistent, or;
  2. MFC has been advised to take a step back and let things unfold safe in the knowledge that they're still in the picture.

hes quite clever with words is Josh  ;)

I like 2 personally

3 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Well not quite... His comments were: 

"We don't stop asking the question, but we've been told to stay away for a fair period of time. We're reading what you guys are reading on that."

Being told to stay away for a period of time can be construed two ways.

  1. MFC has been told time and time again to F off but are annoyingly persistent, or;
  2. MFC has been advised to take a step back and let things unfold safe in the knowledge that they're still in the picture.

He answered this in response to Barrett asking if he thought it was down to two, being North and WC. The end of the sentence was that, based on the above,  Melbourne are reading it the same way.

Pretty sure he was confirming that we had been told to bugger off, not let it play out. Would love to be wrong.

1 hour ago, jnrmac said:

On what planet would Gaff base his decision to go to North or stay at WCE based on whether Hogan goes to Freo?

Uranus. 

38 minutes ago, Good Lord George said:

He answered this in response to Barrett asking if he thought it was down to two, being North and WC. The end of the sentence was that, based on the above,  Melbourne are reading it the same way.

Pretty sure he was confirming that we had been told to bugger off, not let it play out. Would love to be wrong.

"Told to stay away" Interesting turn of phrase. Something feels off about this whole Gaff scenario. I know he's going through a lot, but to be completely shattered as your teammates win a premiership seemed pretty self absorbed. Couldnt put the chin up and put on a smile and be happy for teammates like nic nat? I know im playing the DL cliche of disliking those who turn us down, but Gaff has seemed like a very odd and brittle indecisive person this past week. 

 

Edited by johndemonic


  • Author
28 minutes ago, johndemonic said:

"Told to stay away" Interesting turn of phrase. Something feels off about this whole Gaff scenario. I know he's going through a lot, but to be completely shattered as your teammates win a premiership seemed pretty self absorbed. Couldnt put the chin up and put on a smile and be happy for teammates like nic nat? I know im playing the DL cliche of disliking those who turn us down, but Gaff has seemed like a very odd and brittle indecisive person this past week. 

 

Apples and Oranges.

No need to elaborate.

I’d have thought until the Eagles finished finals we (and other suitors) would have been told to “stay away”... now it’s time to mak e our play, as if he’s leaving the West as seems evident, it’s fairly likely he’d consider us a good option, assuming the numbers at North are not too insane...

Edited by PaulRB

I’ll do a desk pop if Gaff comes to us. Gaff’s manager has stated it’s between staying at West Coast and going to North. The way Mahoney’s words are being read into is amusing, he’s a straight shooter. I know it’s nice to still hold out hope Gaff may come to us but it isn’t happening. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

 

32 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Apples and Oranges.

No need to elaborate.

Fair enough. And ill rightly cop criticism for the harshness of my post

But let me just surmise that maybe Gaff is not the type of person that will thrive with the weight of $1.1m/yr expectations on his shoulders all the while adapting to a new environment. That might be a factor in him being indecisive currently. Time to let this one play out, happy to be wrong.

Edited by johndemonic


Gaff's manager said on Trade Radio today it's between West Coast and North. When asked if it was only those clubs, he said "yes.". We've asked, we've been told no, and now his manager says West Coast or North. There's no way we come close to matching Norths offer of 1.2 million a year for 5-6 years. Probably time to shut this thread down. The club has clearly sent their focus elsewhere since, hopefully on Shiel?

33 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I’ll do a desk pop if Gaff comes to us. Gaff’s manager has stated it’s between staying at West Coast and going to North. The way Mahoney’s words are being read into is amusing, he’s a straight shooter. I know it’s nice to still hold out hope Gaff may come to us but it isn’t happening. 

The ollllld 'desk pop'. I like it.

  • Author
9 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

About 5 years I’d say 

You’re either completely Shyte at math or haven’t bother to click on the links. 

 
13 minutes ago, McQueen said:

You’re either completely Shyte at math or haven’t bother to click on the links. 

Point 2. I actually thought there was a bigger age difference

Edited by Demons11

Two things Gaff would have seriously learnt in the last two weeks:

He's got the monkey on his back from WC/Flag, and all who sail in her, and

He's not going to readily get rid of it at North.....

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 11

    Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

    • 189 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Sydney

    The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

    • 4 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Brisbane

    “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Southport

    The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Sydney

    Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 450 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Brisbane

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 35 replies
    Demonland