Jump to content

Featured Replies

34 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

WARNING

unless you have a particularly strong stomach i would strongly urge you not to read today's hun. It is all that was predicted and more

Robbo's bias used to be funny but I am beginning to worry about his mental state with the amount of Inna curate deluded bial he is spouting on this topic. I always thought Journos had to be vaguely intelligent, Robbo proves that isn't necessarily the case. 

 
25 minutes ago, Abe said:

Just read the Sun, how the hell is Slobbo employed in the media, that was the most biased load of rubbish i've ever seen! how can the AFL allow so much positive talk around a bloke who with his mates made a mockery of their rules and showed the whole world just how much integrity and strength the league really has.

The truth is that the AFL are very often behind the stance of the journos. very few are independent of the grasp and if you wish to keep your accreditation  then you don't rock the boat.

 
36 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I got as far as the headline "Debacle ends with a great injustice" and decided to read no further. 

 

the hard copy was worse with headline "Honour without Glory" in huge letters right across the front page

10 hours ago, Dr evil said:

Under the rules of the AFL if the player with the most votes is deemed ineligible  for the award the award goes to the player or players with the next highest amount of votes, so the players involved in my opinion have a very strong case to be awarded Brownlows, it's the highest individual honor in the game and they shouldn't miss out on the award because Jobe did the wrong thing, i would think the players association would be very keen to argue this point for them.

 

I agree they've got a strong case. But think of the principled mob they'll be arguing it to. Might as well write a letter to Santa. It'll have the same impact. (Tthey might get their wish, or a lump of coal.)

The AFLPA will be very keen to argue the point, unless Gil tells them that they're in fact not keen to argue it.


10 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

the hard copy was worse with headline "Honour without Glory" in huge letters right across the front page

Wow. Truly disgusting. 

Robbo is entitled to his opinion, right or wrong, questioning his sanity is a bit rich, he just has a bigger forum than here to express it.

Not everybody agrees with the majority of opinions expressed on here, which are based on nothing more than other reporting of the matter, we are all free to choose which version we believe

Until Dank and Hird fess up the truth will never be out there

44 minutes ago, Satyriconhome said:

Robbo is entitled to his opinion, right or wrong, questioning his sanity is a bit rich, he just has a bigger forum than here to express it.

Not everybody agrees with the majority of opinions expressed on here, which are based on nothing more than other reporting of the matter, we are all free to choose which version we believe

Until Dank and Hird fess up the truth will never be out there

My biggest issue is that he's pushing a message that doesn't make sense, Jobe himself claimed he handed the medal back to protect what the award stands for but that's rubbish, if that was ever his real concern he would have handed it back the day the appeal failed, not months later when word starts getting around that the AFL was going to take it. 

the thing Jobe is clearly missing is that if he doesn't know what he took, he doesn't know he didn't do what he's been accused of and therefor he doesn't KNOW that he hasn't cheated. 

but he swears black and blue that he's done nothing wrong, implying that he knows for sure that he hasn't taken anything illegal, or feels that he's been duped, but he didn't ask questions, or bang WADA's door down to make sure he was clean, as players are instructed to do if they aren't sure. 

if it were me i'd be really keen to hand it back if i wasn't 100% sure what i'd done was within the rules, so i can't understand why he would feel he has any right to keep it if he couldn't prove he's done the right thing ( keeping in mind that providing accurate records of all substances he's taken is in his agreement and a job requirement and there is absolutely no excuse for any player under any circumstances not doing this )

 

 
2 hours ago, Chris said:

The truth is that the AFL are very often behind the stance of the journos. very few are independent of the grasp and if you wish to keep your accreditation  then you don't rock the boat.

The AFL will love this spin.....those nasty WADA ppl !!! :rolleyes:


ET....should be banned for that...lol

I am reading Slobbos article now 

What an absolute Bucket of steaming Poo he has written. 

Makes me furious that he "Represents" the voice of Football. 

All 34 should have recieved a life Ban if they could not produce evidence, and not one of them could

let alone keep a Brownlow

FFS. You are Pathetic Robinson..

 

17 minutes ago, Dr evil said:

That the AFL allows such rubbish to be printed on its website speaks volumes. 

Produce some Paperwork Hird...or was it all shredded?

15 hours ago, Dr evil said:

I think they could very strongly argue that they should be awarded one. 

Remember whatever the motivation, Jobe handed it back, it was not yet taken from him. 

To me therefore there was no winner in that year and 2nd place is not the winner. 

Might have been different if he been stripped of the medal by the AFL. 

I for one do not believe that Jobe knowingly took banned drugs. However, he has been found guilty of drug in sport offences. 

I predict a successful career after footy for Jobe, in the media, or in the AFL either coaching or within the AFL admin and a very large compo payment via the Bombers. 


15 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

That the AFL allows such rubbish to be printed on its website speaks volumes. 

Produce some Paperwork Hird...or was it all shredded?

it encourages it !!!!

7 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Remember whatever the motivation, Jobe handed it back, it was not yet taken from him. I think a tap on the shoulder accompanied by a 'cough" more likley

To me therefore there was no winner in that year and 2nd place is not the winner.  On this I concur

Might have been different if he been stripped of the medal by the AFL. Again, agree, there would have been a void to fill

I for one do not believe that Jobe knowingly took banned drugs. However, he has been found guilty of drug in sport offences. I'm not with you here at all.i.e  He may not have known ALL that he took but given the waivers etc and that to which he openly admitted to  he wasn't mr Gullible.  He knew it was bent !!

I predict a successful career after footy for Jobe, in the media, or in the AFL either coaching or within the AFL admin and a very large compo payment via the Bombers. Couldnt give a ....  He brought shame to a coveted award and tainted a Name that had no defence.

He has had a long time to ponder his actions. They speak as often do louder than words. There is no honour in what he's done, only personal expedience.

2 hours ago, Redleg said:

Remember whatever the motivation, Jobe handed it back, it was not yet taken from him. 

To me therefore there was no winner in that year and 2nd place is not the winner. 

Might have been different if he been stripped of the medal by the AFL. 

I for one do not believe that Jobe knowingly took banned drugs. However, he has been found guilty of drug in sport offences. 

I predict a successful career after footy for Jobe, in the media, or in the AFL either coaching or within the AFL admin and a very large compo payment via the Bombers. 

redleg, i don't doubt the afl will officially strip him of the medal come tuesday. only the governing body can do that. all watson has done is return it for their decision, returning it at the last moment is a bit reminiscent of essendon "self reporting" only when they heard the axe was about to fall.

19 hours ago, beelzebub said:

Watson played a very clever game, class has nothing to do with it. Street smarts maybe  Apple Tree...say no more

Maybe I'm naive but I think the players were victims of Tirds malfeasance.

1 hour ago, chook fowler said:

Maybe I'm naive but I think the players were victims of Tirds malfeasance.

To a degree I agree. they are victims of trusting the wrong people. fact is though that they trusted the very people you are trained not to in an ASADA sense. As an athlete you are trained to trust no one but ASADA with the stress of what you take. Therefore they are also victims of their own poor judgement. 


No one will ever convince  me the likes of Watson didnt realise it wasn't quite on the up and up. .

41 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

No one will ever convince  me the likes of Watson didnt realise it wasn't quite on the up and up. .

He served a 1 year suspension for drug cheating, and had to hand back his illegally won brownlow.

The history books will not include the insane writing of slobbo etc.

1 hour ago, beelzebub said:

No one will ever convince  me the likes of Watson didnt realise it wasn't quite on the up and up. .

Lifetime banter everywhere for this fellow......

 

Caroline's article in the Age was nothing short of apologetic nonsense well short of her standard.

Is Tuesday going to be now the most shameful day in Australian and AFL Sport

Just now, willmoy said:

Caroline's article in the Age was nothing short of apologetic nonsense well short of her standard.

Is Tuesday going to be now the most shameful day in Australian and AFL Sport

the afl like breaking records, w. it's good for business i'm told (and bonuses)


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Vomit
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 528 replies