Jump to content

Nominations for the new Richmond Board

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, hemingway said:

Really, is that the best you can do Pro?  I hope your a more agreeable person in real life.

If I agee I agree, if I don't I don't. 

If you ask I'll answer honestly, if you don't ask I'll keep my views to myself.

That's my version of "real life".

Btw, your namesake would disapprove of your "yours".

 
  • Author
2 hours ago, pineapple dee said:

Dont be fooled by the teeth, they're mahogany.

Speaking of Mahogany,   Mahogany leaves a lot to be desired.............. Or is that monogamy ?????

7 hours ago, ProDee said:

If I agee I agree, if I don't I don't. 

If you ask I'll answer honestly, if you don't ask I'll keep my views to myself.

That's my version of "real life".

Btw, your namesake would disapprove of your "yours".

wow, really, what a guy.

 
11 hours ago, hemingway said:

wow, really, what a guy.

He posted a while back that he just likes to argue with people.

Life is much simpler when he's relegated to being a yellow bar, although sometimes you get glimpses like this when others quote him.

Of course it's hard to go past our crime luminaries. With the game spreading to China, I do see a role for Sam Dastyari within the club. I'm just a little short on specifics at this stage.


4 hours ago, Return to Glory said:

Of course it's hard to go past our crime luminaries. With the game spreading to China, I do see a role for Sam Dastyari within the club. I'm just a little short on specifics at this stage.

Sam is one hell of a guy. Just make sure he gets briefings from Earl, BBO, Biffen and some of our other "entrepreneurs" ........oh and also that these dealings are at arms length from the club.  

Sorry I missed the point, that being, Sam's value to the RFC not the MFC.

With the RFC, Sam can have a nice fat little contract with the Board.

They are a perfect match, so our own entrepreneurs don't have to get their hands dirty. 

Man the Tigger supporters are NOT happy with Roos' parting shot at Richmond..lol

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/paul-roos-cgagf.1144605/

All the best fabrications are in there. Melbourne tanking entire seasons. Roos on $2m a season paid for by the AFL. Applying for PPs in 2013 & 2014 (that's a new one). Anything to place themselves above Melbourne. They have integrity, apparently :)

 
On 08/09/2016 at 5:24 PM, P-man said:

Man the Tigger supporters are NOT happy with Roos' parting shot at Richmond..lol

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/paul-roos-cgagf.1144605/

All the best fabrications are in there. Melbourne tanking entire seasons. Roos on $2m a season paid for by the AFL. Applying for PPs in 2013 & 2014 (that's a new one). Anything to place themselves above Melbourne. They have integrity, apparently :)

Am one of Roos biggest supporters on here but I thought it was not wise to say something negative about another club's predicament and he was setting himself up for a backlash and he knew it.  It also showed a lack of knowledge of our club history of breakaway groups, Board overthrows and subsequent club disarray. 

That part of his speech was not one of Roos' finer oratory moments.

Also, if another club's senior coach took a shot (however well intended) at our Club and our Board, Demonland would also rally to defend our club's honour.

 

54 minutes ago, P-man said:

Man the Tigger supporters are NOT happy with Roos' parting shot at Richmond..lol

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/paul-roos-cgagf.1144605/

All the best fabrications are in there. Melbourne tanking entire seasons. Roos on $2m a season paid for by the AFL. Applying for PPs in 2013 & 2014 (that's a new one). Anything to place themselves above Melbourne. They have integrity, apparently :)

Thanks that thread was marvellous. Anyone would think Richmond had won the last 5 Flags reading that!!

smash them yearly Demons. 


We are a rabble but we ink in the Tigers as a win  each year.

2 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Am one of Roos biggest supporters on here but I thought it was not wise to say something negative about another club's predicament and he was setting himself up for a backlash and he knew it.  It also showed a lack of our club history of breakaway groups, Board overthrows and subsequent club disarray. 

That part of his speech was not one of Roos' finer oratory moments.

Also, if another club's senior coach took a shot (however well intended) at our Club and our Board, Demonland would also rally to defend our club's honour.

 

Perhaps. I'm sure they'll get over it.

There's something very entertaining about an angry mob of foaming Richmond fans. If trolling Richmond is Roosy's parting gift, thats not a bad note to end on :) 

8 minutes ago, P-man said:

Perhaps. I'm sure they'll get over it.

There's something very entertaining about an angry mob of foaming Richmond fans. If trolling Richmond is Roosy's parting gift, thats not a bad note to end on :) 

The saliva, the chicken poo, the microwaves, the hysteria on the radio ... it touches the high and mighty, the downtrodden, the eccentrics ... it's a rich tapestry.

Looking at the Richmond Best and Fairest results, you have to wonder what Brandon Ellis did to annoy everyone in 2015. He's the only player in Richmond's top 10 this year who wasn't in their top ten last year. He replaced the injured Houli.

Over the last 6 seasons, 12 players, comprising this years top-10 plus the injured pair Houli and Morris, have shared 50 out of a possible 60 placings in the top-10.

8 of the players from Richmond's 2011 top-10 are still at the club, including 6 who are also in this season's top-10, with Houli and Vickery the others.

In comparison, there are only 9 players total from our entire 2011 list who are still at Melbourne now.

 

Richmond have had absolute continuity of their best dozen players for 6 seasons, almost all of Hardwick's tenure. Presumably that was the basis of the original '5 year plan' (the Hardwick one, not the Wallace one). But they absolutely failed to develop a second tier or any depth at all. Or a coherent plan.

Now they are going after Prestia in a big way... do they really think that going from 12 to 13 on the B&F merry-go-round will change their problems?

Broken club. Remember when Melbourne was going to recruit Jonathon Brown to 'change everything'?

 

 

47 minutes ago, Little Goffy said:

Looking at the Richmond Best and Fairest results, you have to wonder what Brandon Ellis did to annoy everyone in 2015. He's the only player in Richmond's top 10 this year who wasn't in their top ten last year. He replaced the injured Houli.

Over the last 6 seasons, 12 players, comprising this years top-10 plus the injured pair Houli and Morris, have shared 50 out of a possible 60 placings in the top-10.

8 of the players from Richmond's 2011 top-10 are still at the club, including 6 who are also in this season's top-10, with Houli and Vickery the others.

In comparison, there are only 9 players total from our entire 2011 list who are still at Melbourne now.

 

Richmond have had absolute continuity of their best dozen players for 6 seasons, almost all of Hardwick's tenure. Presumably that was the basis of the original '5 year plan' (the Hardwick one, not the Wallace one). But they absolutely failed to develop a second tier or any depth at all. Or a coherent plan.

Now they are going after Prestia in a big way... do they really think that going from 12 to 13 on the B&F merry-go-round will change their problems?

Broken club. Remember when Melbourne was going to recruit Jonathon Brown to 'change everything'?

 

 

I am sure Roosy will cop a little Flak for his statement. Bu he is correct. Richmond have backed their list since 2011 and only topped up from there

absolute fools. But may it continue...


Dan Richardson, their football director was castigated for saying that Richmond couldn't rebuild, because the fans couldn't/wouldn't tolerate it.

How true he was, and the emergence of the Board challenge at the Toiyges is living proof.

That said, they did go down the path of importing good average players for a number of years to get themselves off the bottom quickly.  Maric, Rance, Houli, Grigg, Hampson, Chaplin all did that job excellently, and they played finals.  You will find those names in Little Goffys list of Richmonds best players.

But then they stopped and went down the path of trying for the "big one".  Trouble was they got burned when they couldn't attract anyone so they just kept going for second best ala Yarran. Why...because the fans wanted it.

Apart from Yarran, with zero games to his name and Townsend (who?) I don't think they have traded for the past 2 years. And they gave away their 2nd round pick this year as part of the Yarran trade. 

So this year they have pick 6 and nothing else with which to rebuild.  And their fans are all pressuring to bring in Prestia with his injuries, thinking a single player will lift them to glory.

Unlike us who HAVE rebuilt, and as LG has noted, all their best players have been there since 2011.  They are all ageing and have little currency in the trade market, since the fans again would not them trade Cotchin, Martin, Rance or Reiwoldt. 

The future is very very bleak for the Toiyges.

 

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 141 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 39 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 318 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies