THE BOMBERS' SWISS ADVENTURE

[Sir Why You Little 36,894]

7 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Of course.....but what and on who. Lol

James knows everything that went on

but he won't be saying a word now. Or at least not any truth...

[DemonFrog 1,352]

2 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

James knows everything that went on

but he won't be saying a word now. Or at least not any truth...

He appeard to be determined to keep the truth coming out. I wonder why that was?

[Sir Why You Little 36,894]

21 minutes ago, DemonFrog said:

He appeard to be determined to keep the truth coming out. I wonder why that was?

He's been paid off. His entire journey may have been planned...

[Melbman2 226]

$750K to cover his legal fees, does that count as a gift in the eyes of the ATO?

 

[Cards13 9,117]

Recent Age article said he was a biochemist, he claims he has no medical training yet he then states peptides are fine...

Poor fellas social invitations dried up as well, devastating for him.

 

http://m.theage.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/stephen-dank-says-he-told-league-player-injecting-peptides-was-safe-20160216-gmvvep.html

[beelzebub 23,311]

There's a little Walter Mitty about Dank me thinks

[sue 9,096]

54 minutes ago, Cards13 said:

Recent Age article said he was a biochemist, he claims he has no medical training yet he then states peptides are fine...

Poor fellas social invitations dried up as well, devastating for him.

 

http://m.theage.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/stephen-dank-says-he-told-league-player-injecting-peptides-was-safe-20160216-gmvvep.html

After reading that it is clear that Dank is no mastermind. He is a fool.

[beelzebub 23,311]

11 minutes ago, sue said:

After reading that it is clear that Dank is no mastermind. He is a fool.

The man is clearly delusional,,,,seriously

[Dees2014 2,377]

14 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

By all accounts Little and Hird weren't very buddy, buddy towards the end and neither was the AFL with Hird. 

I tend to think a coterie member put up the $750k... you know one of the influential type that miraculously 'convinced' Charter, Alavi etc not to testify at the AFL Tribunal. 

If my hunch is right, never fear, they will likely call in the favour one of these day, then Hird will pay his dues. 

Nobody stumps up $750K cool ones for no reason ... we may not hear about it but whoever it was will want to collect from the teflon one

Try the AFL "benevolent" fund. They have most to gain in shutting Hird up. 

[beelzebub 23,311]

5 minutes ago, Dees2014 said:

Try the AFL "benevolent" fund. They have most to gain in shutting Hird up. 

Hadnt thought of that...hmmmm

[monoccular 17,408]

12 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

James knows everything that went on

but he won't be saying a word now. Or at least not any truth...

and everything the went in

His silence has been bought.

[DemonFrog 1,352]

BB is the rumour true that you organized the $750k gift to Hirdy by passing the hat around Demonland?

We all know how much you really care about Hirdy and how you want the true come out about Essendon supplements program.

[beelzebub 23,311]

7 minutes ago, DemonFrog said:

BB is the rumour true that you organized the $750k gift to Hirdy by passing the hat around Demonland?

We all know how much you really care about Hirdy and how you want the true come out about Essendon supplements program.

No comment 

[old dee 23,682]

17 minutes ago, DemonFrog said:

BB is the rumour true that you organized the $750k gift to Hirdy by passing the hat around Demonland?

We all know how much you really care about Hirdy and how you want the true come out about Essendon supplements program.

He can neither confirm or deny BF

[Sir Why You Little 36,894]

1 hour ago, monoccular said:

and everything the went in

His silence has been bought.

It certainly has. Which was probably the plan from day 1

Send him to France & then exhaust the court system...

Tracey Holmes should never be in the media again

(Well maybe No Idea Magazine)...

[beelzebub 23,311]

1 hour ago, old dee said:

He can neither confirm or deny BF

I wouldn't mind the experience of actually having $750k though

[old dee 23,682]

2 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

I wouldn't mind the experience of actually having $750k though

You are not Robinson Crusoe.

[John Crow Batty 8,860]

 

I would be wary of engaging Mr Young QC for legal advice. His advice looks more suitable for the WC.

http://m.theage.com.au/victoria/james-hird-reveals-how-lawyers-attacked-judges-decision-over-supplements-saga-20160217-gmw8vb.html

Edited February 17, 2016 by america de cali

[sue 9,096]

3 minutes ago, america de cali said:

 

I would be wary of engaging Mr Young QC for legal advice. His advice looks more suitable for the WC.

http://m.theage.com.au/victoria/james-hird-reveals-how-lawyers-attacked-judges-decision-over-supplements-saga-20160217-gmw8vb.html

Reading that I have only one suggestion for Mr Hird. Find new laywers.

[beelzebub 23,311]

1 minute ago, sue said:

Reading that I have only one suggestion for Mr Hird. Find new laywers.

nah...they deserve each other lol

[John Crow Batty 8,860]

4 minutes ago, sue said:

Reading that I have only one suggestion for Mr Hird. Find new  B

He seems to be blaming them  now for leading him astray with advice that didn't work. Next he will be suing his own lawyers.

 

Edited February 17, 2016 by america de cali

[Red and Bluebeard 2,082]

Just now, america de cali said:

He seems to be blaming them  now for leading him astray with advice that didn't work. Next he will be suing them for incompetence.

Their legal competence seems to be so good that they will probably sue him for not employing them to mount yet another hopeless appeal ... 

[george_on_the_outer 7,546]

Poor old James still doesn't get it. 

The conversations went on between lawyers/solicitors/QC's and their opinions is irrelevant.

The case is about Chubb not indemnifying him for initiating legal action. 

He chose to do it. It would appear he was not insured to do so. 

[sue 9,096]

I don't understand how that bad advice is relevant to suing his insurers.  Presumably his policy covered him for actions he instigated as long as they are reasonable actions in some legal way?  Oh no, not another case of 'comfortable satisfaction'!

[beelzebub 23,311]

2 minutes ago, george_on_the_outer said:

Poor old James still doesn't get it. 

The conversations went on between lawyers/solicitors/QC's and their opinions is irrelevant.

The case is about Chubb not indemnifying him for initiating legal action. 

He chose to do it. It would appear he was not insured to do so. 

funny how he missed that little point !!