Jump to content

Charlie Dixon

Featured Replies

Naturally, would love him, but at what cost? We should be looking to secure Hogan to a long-term deal at year's end. Ideally, we'd be aiming for a GWS mid too. Where do we find the cap space?

Watts, Howe, Jamar - there'd have to be close to $1.5M/year right there surely?

 

Here we go again, Dixon came back in against Brisbane, their defence is floundering, let's see him do it for a couple of weeks before we start salivating, he wasn't exactly in form for the previous weeks

 
  • Author

Here we go again, Dixon came back in against Brisbane, their defence is floundering, let's see him do it for a couple of weeks before we start salivating, he wasn't exactly in form for the previous weeks

he played against the Giants also, competed really strongly and kicked a couple of goals

17th for Centre Clearances

18th for Inside 50's

Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids,


17th for Centre Clearances

18th for Inside 50's

Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids,

Yes, mids.

And CHarlie Dixon.

  • Author

17th for Centre Clearances

18th for Inside 50's

Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids,

a quality ruckman is something we desperately need, Jamar has been servicable but look at the difference Mumford is making to the giants

17th for Centre Clearances

18th for Inside 50's

Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids,

a quality ruckman is something we desperately need, Jamar has been servicable but look at the difference Mumford is making to the giants

...and a ruckman is a mid.

 

I'm thinking there could be a few Gold Coast available comes years end, especially after their latest off field "incident"

I'm thinking there could be a few Gold Coast available comes years end, especially after their latest off field "incident"

Maybe Prestia is starting to wish he was back in Victoria :)


Fingers crossed on Trenners and Petracca, them plus Viney would help alot at the moment.

Plus more Mids

  • 5 months later...

Seeing as Dixon is being mentioned among other trade targets thought I'd bump this thread.

What would a potential deal look like? Exchange of picks, players etc? Perhaps we can package Howe in this deal with pick 6 in return for Dixon & a 3rd Round pick to get it over the line.

I think Howe & Pick 6 should get us Dixon plus one of Picks 19 or 22.

Howe would be a great promotional tool for GC17.

Mods please move into Taylor Made Thread.

I think Howe & Pick 6 should get us Dixon plus one of Picks 19 or 22.

Howe would be a great promotional tool for GC17.

Mods please move into Taylor Made Thread.

I think we lose that trade. I don't understand why the market is so keen on Dixon given his injury history.


I think we lose that trade. I don't understand why the market is so keen on Dixon given his injury history.

Because Dixon and Hogan that's why...

Holy moses that'd be amazing.

His manager was on trade radio. Commented that Dixon only wants to go to Port & that he doesn't want to be traded to any other club. The reason he wants to be at Port is Ken Hinkley.

17th for Centre Clearances

18th for Inside 50's

Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids,

I'd like to add my bit as well..

Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids,

I'd like to add my bit as well..

Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids, Mids,

So you like Mids?

His manager was on trade radio. Commented that Dixon only wants to go to Port & that he doesn't want to be traded to any other club. The reason he wants to be at Port is Ken Hinkley.

Where was he mentioned? By middymalt in the other thread?

He was always going to Port. Nowhere else.

Holy hell you guys can be gullible.


His manager was on trade radio. Commented that Dixon only wants to go to Port & that he doesn't want to be traded to any other club. The reason he wants to be at Port is Ken Hinkley.

I could have told you that you know.

Where was he mentioned? By middymalt in the other thread?

He was always going to Port. Nowhere else.

Holy hell you guys can be gullible.

Just saying what I heard WB some of you blokes need to read your previous predictions before getting your knickers in a knot.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 89 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 323 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies