Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
9 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

The chase and tackle his highlight of the night, last week he didn't look like even thinking about laying a tackle.

He still can't kick for goal further than about 35 metres out which a big concern. His kicking action just has no power to it.

Wow!

he was our best player.

Open your fuggin eyes!!

 
 

Club tried to trade him at the end of last year and it didn’t sit well with him.

Glad he’s started this year so well. Hopefully all wounds have healed.

3 minutes ago, Beetle said:

Club tried to trade him at the end of last year and it didn’t sit well with him.

I call [censored]

Proof? 


1 minute ago, Jaded said:

I call [censored]

Proof? 

Call whatever you want.

From a current player and close friend’s mouth. 

Bring out the torches and pitch forks..

8 minutes ago, Beetle said:

Club tried to trade him at the end of last year and it didn’t sit well with him.

Glad he’s started this year so well. Hopefully all wounds have healed.

No one wanted him????

10 minutes ago, Beetle said:

Club tried to trade him at the end of last year and it didn’t sit well with him.

Glad he’s started this year so well. Hopefully all wounds have healed.

What a load of crap. 

 
1 minute ago, Demon77 said:

No one wanted him????

I don’t know the reasons behind that, but that’s what I understand.

He has some things he needs to work through though...

11 minutes ago, Beetle said:

Club tried to trade him at the end of last year and it didn’t sit well with him.

Glad he’s started this year so well. Hopefully all wounds have healed.

Ah, April Fools, good one!!


1 minute ago, Demon77 said:

Ah, April Fools, good one!!

No, but anyway. 

Don’t know why I bother with this joint. Provide some info and get shot down.

3 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

What a load of crap. 

Yeah Wiseblood, it’s just a load of crap. Appreciate you’re uninformed input into what I had to say.

Just now, Beetle said:

No, but anyway. 

Don’t know why I bother with this joint. Provide some info and get shot down.

Sorry B, thought you might be having a joke, it could be true, just a bit odd it comes out now.

Just now, Beetle said:

Yeah Wiseblood, it’s just a load of crap. Appreciate you’re uninformed input into what I had to say.

I've heard otherwise. 

Good enough? 

1 minute ago, Demon77 said:

Sorry B, thought you might be having a joke, it could be true, just a bit odd it comes out now.

I’ve been umming and ahing whether to say anything for about 4 weeks now. 

Anyway make of it what you will. I’m not trying to stir up controversy.


3 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

I've heard otherwise. 

Good enough? 

I couldn’t care less personally.

This came from a current player...maybe your info is better than mine. Congrats.

  • Author
22 minutes ago, Beetle said:

Club tried to trade him at the end of last year and it didn’t sit well with him.

Glad he’s started this year so well. Hopefully all wounds have healed.

Can I ask you why you’d bother to even raise such an item in round 2 of the following season?

 

2 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Can I ask you why you’d bother to even raise such an item in round 2 of the following season?

 

As previously stated I only heard this approx 4 to 6 weeks ago and was reluctant to post it.

Anyway, I have now....as I said make of that what you will.

32 minutes ago, Beetle said:

Club tried to trade him at the end of last year and it didn’t sit well with him.

Glad he’s started this year so well. Hopefully all wounds have healed.

Ahwell, his value has just gone through the roof.


1 minute ago, Beetle said:

As previously stated I only heard this approx 4 to 6 weeks ago and was reluctant to post it.

Anyway, I have now....as I said make of that what you will.

It simply goes against everything that has been said, or even intimated.  Resigning to the Dees, the issues and support last year, what he has said, was the coach has said.  He was untradable last year, confirmed by the Club and Jesse.

it is difficult to marry that up with ‘a current player said ‘.  Unfortunately, as honest as you may want to appear, it looks like an April fools troll.

what can you offer to substantiate your claim?

There’s no way I believe the club put him on the trade table, especially after the horror year he endured. If Hogan requested a trade it would have been made public. If we put Hogan up for trade, a deal would have absolutely been done with Fremantle of West Coast. Nothing personal Beetle, you may well have been provided information. I just question the validity of it. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

4 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

It simply goes against everything that has been said, or even intimated.  Resigning to the Dees, the issues and support last year, what he has said, was the coach has said.  He was untradable last year, confirmed by the Club and Jesse.

it is difficult to marry that up with ‘a current player said ‘.  Unfortunately, as honest as you may want to appear, it looks like an April fools troll.

what can you offer to substantiate your claim?

I can’t offer anything more, with the risk of the player away, which I won’t.

Im clearly a troll and have been working up to this post in my 11 years of membership.

 

 
3 minutes ago, Beetle said:

Im clearly a troll and have been working up to this post in my 11 years of membership.

Finally some truth!

1 minute ago, WERRIDEE said:

Finally some truth!

Unlike you Werridee I understand football and know what I’m taking about.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 91 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 340 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies