Tigers are after Tyson don't like the sound of that.

Tigers are after Tyson don't like the sound of that.

They can give us Rance then..

Seriously, nobody from that mob could come close to the value we'd want for Tyson. He's not going anywhere.

Edited October 5, 201510 yr by Scythe

Only deal id consider is ellis for tyson. Pretty sure we'd be paying him more money than they could

Only deal id consider is ellis for tyson. Pretty sure we'd be paying him more money than they could

Ellis? Yuk.

Tigers are after Tyson don't like the sound of that.

They should get more creative then. Seems like every year they look at someone from our list. Its never worked out well for them either

Fair enough. Let's change this to 'very little', potentially.

BS Adam, same circumstances as Judd or Boyd leaving before free agency, they would still get a 1st round pick next year, so stop trying to valid your stupid wrong point in first place that they'd lose him for nothing.

Edited October 5, 201510 yr by thevil1

Tigers are after Tyson don't like the sound of that.

Tigers were said to want him before we acquired him.

Having said that, I can't see us trading Tyson unless it's for an exceptional return.

Only deal id consider is ellis for tyson. Pretty sure we'd be paying him more money than they could

I think you're unstable because you're drunk.

You wouldn't give up pick 6 for Prestia? Reallllllly?

You haven't put this imbecile on ignore yet?

You haven't put this imbecile on ignore yet?

Does that make you feel better?

Can rest easy on Tyson for the time being. Richmond would have to put something extraordinary on the table for the club to even consider it.

Can rest easy on Tyson for the time being. Richmond would have to put something extraordinary on the table for the club to even consider it.

Unless Tyson wants to move there... god forbid

Unless Tyson wants to move there... god forbid

He's contracted

no we don't give up P-6.

we aren't well off enough, to give away our chances on elite kids from the draft at this stage. if we 'PASS' on another Stringer, or Wines, then I'm done with footy forever.

Prestia is contracted til next year, IF we cannot tempt a trade for him this season, then we wait til 2016.

O'Meara, we should be chasing, & looking for a trade deal for him as well... but we keep P-6. Trade players, Or a mix of players, plus our 2nd Rnd pick, OK... but don't pass up a Curnow, or such.

So you think we should take a punt on a young kid in the draft instead of a proven gun?

Also I think you time int eh sport will be short if you walk the next time a draft pick goes wrong, happens all the time to all clubs, that is why taking a punt on a kid when a gun is in the offering would be stupid in the extreme.

He's contracted

Should know that means nothing Jaded

Should know that means nothing Jaded

It actually means something - it actually means a lot. It means the club holds all the cards. But if you are alluding to the fact that contracted players move - spot on.

Why in God's name would Richmond want Tyson?

Anyway, could work out okay.

Prestia to Melbourne

Tyson to Richmond

Ellis to GC

Why on Gods green earth would we trade out one of our best mids for ? Dom had a quieter year compared to '14 but if he ended up at Richmond I'd be seriously pist off.

Where the hell has this trade Tyson junk come from?

No way in hell are we interested in trading Tyson.

Where the hell has this trade Tyson junk come from?

No way in hell are we interested in trading Tyson.

I think someone is yanking our chain.

Ellis is a gun, Tyson needs another step up before he's on that level.

Where the hell has this trade Tyson junk come from?

No way in hell are we interested in trading Tyson.

Yet it is trading time and it was our own coach who said that all players were potentially trade able.

Although given the story on Hogan........not everyone. Perhaps we should not take the coaches comments too literally but it does suggest that Roos has an open mind on our list.

If you look at the Hawthorn template you can see what player attributes every coach must be seeking. .

lol. Richmond can be as 'interested' as they want.

Honestly, I love this time of year, but some of these things that come out are just plain dumb. There are so many dimwitted footy fans out there that reckon clubs bandy player names about is if they're playing cards. There is absolutely no way in the world the club would be interested in trading Tyson after the lengths it went to get him here, and I'd be surprised if Richmond even wasted their time enquiring.

Yet it is trading time and it was our own coach who said that all players were potentially trade able.

Although given the story on Hogan........not everyone. Perhaps we should not take the coaches comments too literally but it does suggest that Roos has an open mind on our list.

If you look at the Hawthorn template you can see what player attributes every coach must be seeking. .

well even hoges at a pinch, ernest.

if someone offered you 3 a-grade 24yo players you would at least have to consider it

Reading from the top of the thread downward, it is funny how things snowball. 'Middymalt' probably just pulled this out of his arse and now people are mentioning possible trade scenarios...

Tyson has only been at the club for a couple of years, is a very good player (had an underrated season to an extent, I think) and is contracted. Seriously, I think some of the discussion would be better spent on other potential scenarios.

Tyson won't be going anywhere.