The only way I would support this is if it's used as bait for a much bigger fish.

Trengove hasn't played for a year, and had a disappointing season the one before. His value isn't as high as many here would like to think.

If it makes the side better in the long run, I'm all for it.

But I really do like Jack and on face value it looks a trade that could leave us the laughing stock yet again.

Is this part of a scheme to purge ourselves of the Prendergast curse?

They wouldn't have promoted Jetta if it was.

Freaking disgusting. How is us throwing in pick 23 even required? Farce. Unless this leads to Dangerfield or equivalent star coming on board next its horrific.

The JT bashers would love it if this happens - the same haters who talk about loyalty.

Fess up, where are you hiding now?

Freaking disgusting. How is us throwing in pick 23 even required? Farce. Unless this leads to Dangerfield or equivalent star coming on board next its horrific.

Agree. It's gotta be bull.

Doesn't it?

Hmmm this is very interesting. Jack Trengove is not what we thought...Pick 12 must already be in place for an improvement..

8 years of failure here kiddies...Roos has been bought in to do the job

Let's see what happens.

Trengove has been sub par since 2011.......that is 4 years (88 Games....)

This is what "everyone is tradeable" looks like.

No point throwing our hands in the air, this is typical of the kinds of trades that many here have been proposing in regards to players from other clubs coming to the Dees.

Edited October 10, 201411 yr by bing181

Hmmm this is very interesting. Jack Trengove is not what we thought...Pick 12 must already be in place for an improvement..

8 years of failure here kiddies...Roos has been bought in to do the job

Let's see what happens.

Trengove has been sub par since 2011.......that is 4 years (88 Games....)

As I've said above, I am a big fan of Trenners but you are pretty spot on here WYL.

If he weren't to improve from here on in, it'd probably be a win for us. But I really do hope we don't trade him.

Do it if his fitness is doubtful. Has looked like the second coming of late-dees Brock the past few seasons.

If he can get his body right this is silly.

I'd trust the club if they pulled the trigger.

If it's driven by the club then it seems near certain that we need the pick 12 to make another deal work. Coupling 2 or 3 with 12 can only mean a very very good player. I'm excited.

Where's the 'Trust in Roos' brigade when you need them?

Don't [censored] do it MFC

Major mistake if this goes through

Agree. It's gotta be bull.

Doesn't it?

I still think, as a collective (and I know we're asking plenty of the supporters), we need to hold our judgement on this trade until we see the bigger picture. Roos has stated that he doesn't want us to draft in too many kids and I believe him. While Dangerfield may be out of reach, there may be something else going on underneath it all that we don't know about yet. To me there must be a player out there that we can get for 2 first rounders that will bring more to the table than what Roos believes Trengove can, and he is going hard after it. It would mean we get one of Brayshaw/Petracca, an excellent midfielder, Stretch, Lumumba, Garlett and possibly Frost. To me that is an excellent trade period.

It still has to happen but I think there is more here than meets the eye.

Extended his contract when Scully took the money and ran.

Accepted the captaincy when we were at our lowest.

A role model on the training track and originally injured his foot doing non-compulsory preseason training sessions.

Even the article sights him as being 'reluctant' to move to Richmond.

I don't get overly worked up about list decisions the club makes - but this one would do my head in.

This is like trading Woewodin all over again.

The game gets faster every year...I wonder how quick Jack can be?

Roos wouldn't be doing this lightly...

2009 what a fantastic draft for BP it was....

Farout!!! They can get [censored]!! If they make this trade!!

If this happens I will put my member in the microwave.

looks like a terrible deal on the face of things.

a pick 2 from 5 years ago AND a second round pick for pick 12?

once a player is on a list it makes no difference where he was picked. If club sees potential it makes no difference if you're $cully or Rockliff

If it's driven by the club then it seems near certain that we need the pick 12 to make another deal work. Coupling 2 or 3 with 12 can only mean a very very good player. I'm excited.

I'm clinging to this like Kate Winslet to a floating piece of debris in the Atlantic. Unfortunately, Jack Trengove is playing the role of Leonardo DiCaprio.

Extended his contract when Scully took the money and ran.

Accepted the captaincy when we were at our lowest.

A role model on the training track and originally injured his foot doing non-compulsory preseason training sessions.

Even the article sights him as being 'reluctant' to move to Richmond.

I don't get overly worked up about list decisions the club makes - but this one would do my head in.

This is like trading Woewodin all over again.

Trading Woewodin was the right thing to do....

(just Saying)

Would undo a lot of our good work IMO.

Very very unhappy about it.

This is only happening if we package 3 and 12... So the question is, who is it?

I am a massive wrap for Trenners and always will be... But... The below scenario is jumping out at me

Trengove to Tigers for pick 12

Pick 2 used by dees to snag best available mid

Picks 3 + 12 to Colling%^#* in exchange for Beams

Thoughts?

Beams doesn't NEED to move North... He WANTS out of shitsville!

Maybe its to help the Ryder deal get thru: An elite Port player to Dees for pick 3 and 12 and one of those Port sends on to Essendon (with their) 17 for Ryder.

Or something similar to help get the Beams deal thru altho I can't think of anyone I would want from the pies.

Edited October 10, 201411 yr by Lucifer's Hero