Busy night of media for Roosy. AFL 360 then into the FC studio. Not sure what time he will be on but guests are usually on the first or second segment.

He seems to get asked exactly the same questions all of the time

were you happy with how you went on the weekend?

how goods dom Tyson?

how bads jack watts?

is james frawley staying?

are you staying for the third year?

rumours on Jeremy Cameron?

next guest.

Well they are most of the questions we want answered. Doubt we will be much wiser though.

Club stooping low to agree to this appearance.

I'll be well tucked up in bed and won't even bother recording this tripe. Right up there with TFS this rubbish.

He seems to get asked exactly the same questions all of the time

were you happy with how you went on the weekend?

how goods dom Tyson?

how bads jack watts?

is james frawley staying?

are you staying for the third year?

rumours on Jeremy Cameron?

next guest.

The only one you left out was, "what did you make of <insert debatable umpiring decision>?"

When you think about it, the guy has the patience of a saint.

Club stooping low to agree to this appearance.

I'll be well tucked up in bed and won't even bother recording this tripe. Right up there with TFS this rubbish.

Shock horror the club willing to put the coach on one of the few rating footy programs.

It's basically free publicity to our sponsors and has to be done. But I doubt Roos will have much to say. At least he gets a chance to address questions from Hutchy and Wilson (and on the TFS Barrett). They might be bottom feeders but strangely they are granted a lot of influence and they can make life hard if they persistently peddle crap rumours. Unfortunately it's better to have them onside.

Agree that the Club needs all the exposure it can get especially from a great media performer like Roos

I would love to see Damien Barrett argue with Roosy about a topic

DB: is it correct the the club is looking to recruit Jeremy Cameron?

PR: no, it's categorically incorrect, we have had no contact with Jeremy, and we will not have any contact with Jeremy.

DB: but my sources tell me you have made him an offer and several news sources have reported the same thing...

PR: need to check your sources mate, i would be very surprised if the club is trying to recruit him behind my back.

I would love to see Damien Barrett argue with Roosy about a topic

the Dom Tyson trade is a good possibility if Barrett arks up

the Dom Tyson trade is a good possibility if Barrett arks up

I think Roosy would be laughing to much to argue with purple on that one, he seems to find the critics on that one hilarious, what's dom averaging 25 touches and a goal a game? haha

I would love to see Damien Barrett argue with Roosy about a topic

DB: is it correct the the club is looking to recruit Jeremy Cameron?

PR: no, it's categorically incorrect, we have had no contact with Jeremy, and we will not have any contact with Jeremy.

DB: but my sources tell me you have made him an offer and several news sources have reported the same thing...

PR: need to check your sources mate, i would be very surprised if the club is trying to recruit him behind my back.

Wouldn't mind Barrett being right on that one.

Never seen Purple confrontational with anyone of substance. His trademarks are innuendo, distortion and trying to extract headlines out of nothing. He would be mincemeat in any argument.

He threatened to put some dude in hospital if he ever found him on twitter last week!!!

He threatened to put some dude in hospital if he ever found him on twitter last week!!!

you mean the dude threatened purple?

good bloke

No purple was dealing out the threat

He threatened to put some dude in hospital if he ever found him on twitter last week!!!

What a plonker

Can someone explain to me how a penalty can be awarded against Watts for front end contact after punching the ball out. He made contact on the follow through. Is this correct?

If Watts made contact with Wingard's head on the follow-through it's clearly a free kick.

If Watts made contact with Wingard's head on the follow-through it's clearly a free kick.

If that's the case it's a terrible rule, it's essentially saying Watts should not try and spoil the ball incase he makes contact with someone afterwards, it's a mans game ffs, imo it was a terrible decision whether correct by the letter of the law or not, a match defining decision was made that penalised a player for attacking the ball 100% and rewarded a bloke for simply standing in the way.

When are you signing on for another year?

Can someone explain to me how a penalty can be awarded against Watts for front end contact after punching the ball out. He made contact on the follow through. Is this correct?

Umpire didn't see it and guessed or he saw it and made an incorrect call. The only possible answers.

Umpire didn't see it and guessed or he saw it and made an incorrect call. The only possible answers.

Umpires intimidated by the port crowd?

If Watts made contact with Wingard's head on the follow-through it's clearly a free kick.

Disagree

No purple was dealing out the threat

Hahahahahaha!!!! Now that I would pay to see, that bell end swinging at someone.

Haha wtf? This was on during the add break..

"Will demon coach Paul Roos leave the demons?" Find out next on footy classified...

Since when is Roosy leaving??????

Gimps.