Jump to content

Recruiting or Development.

Featured Replies

 

Niall's not far off the money there.

The cycle will turn .

Its starting to open up again now.

 

Just to bump this thread with an outsider's view, interesting Age article re Melbourne's drafting in the context of the changing game:

http://www.theage.co...0410-1wn4v.html

Interesting article. If what he's saying is true, then it's lucky we got a refund for the light-bodied Tom Scully.

The cycle will turn .

Its starting to open up again now.

What's more damning is that by the end of 2010 the club seemingly still hadn't worked this out. Despite our clear need for a hard, power forward, it then picked Cook over Darling - ie, it picked yet another skinny, tall, mobile forward over a hard, power forward.

Here are the bios that were posted on the AFL website PRIOR to the draft. Our ineptitude on this pick is simply stunning. Cook may very well turn out to be a great player, but he's not what this club needs now or at the time we picked him. It's that simple. Criminal stupidity. Also decadent in the extreme.

Cook in his own words: http://www.afl.com.a...38/default.aspx

What type of player are you?

A mobile tall forward with the versatility to go back or play on a wing.

Isn't this what Niall is saying Watts is?

Darling, on the other hand, in his own words: http://www.afl.com.a...51/default.aspx

What type of player are you?

A hard, courageous and competitive player who brings other players into the game.

Which AFL player do you feel you resemble and why?

People say Jonathan Brown with his strength, courage and leadership. Lance Franklin as well because of his agility, speed and athleticism.

What are your strengths as a footballer?

Marking, ferocity at the ball, defensive pressure, strength, speed, endurance, agility and mental strength.

Isn't this what Niall is saying everyone in the competition knew the MFC clearly needed, given our light bodied focus in 2008? Cop a tip, I think it is.

No pick p1sses me off more than this one. It was just so obvious that, by the end of 2010, Darling more than Cook was the player WE needed at pick 12.


I agree 100% Ron, the only question in my mind is that after his first contract would he have done a Scott Thompson on us? We'll never know but I can guarantee WCE would have gone very hard for him and given him every excuse to go home. It's all hypothetical but I have a feeling he would have said "Go f&%& yourself San Francisco Melbourne" :lol:

And, if it's the case that we didn't pick Darling because he got drunk outside a nightclub one night (hardly unusual behaviour for a young sportsman I might add), that suggests the club didn't have a lot of confidence in our leadership structure and the club culture at the time - ie, it says a lot if an AFL club doesn't believe it can haul the behaviour of a talented 18 year old into line.

And, if our football department did think the leadership and club culture was sufficiently sound, why the hell did it let Junior go at least one year prematurely?!

They were clearly all over the shop. Amateur in the extreme. Thank God we now have Neeld.

And, if it's the case that we didn't pick Darling because he got drunk outside a nightclub one night (hardly unusual behaviour for a young sportsman I might add), that suggests the club didn't have a lot of confidence in our leadership structure and the club culture at the time - ie, it says a lot if an AFL club doesn't believe it can haul the behaviour of a talented 18 year old into line.

And, if our football department did think the leadership and club culture was sufficiently sound, why the hell did it let Junior go at least one year prematurely?!

They were clearly all over the shop. Amateur in the extreme. Thank God we now have Neeld.

Any chance you could get the actual facts of the matter Ron instead of getting off on your lack of them?

 

What's more damning is that by the end of 2010 the club seemingly still hadn't worked this out. Despite our clear need for a hard, power forward, it then picked Cook over Darling - ie, it picked yet another skinny, tall, mobile forward over a hard, power forward.

Here are the bios that were posted on the AFL website PRIOR to the draft. Our ineptitude on this pick is simply stunning. Cook may very well turn out to be a great player, but he's not what this club needs now or at the time we picked him. It's that simple. Criminal stupidity. Also decadent in the extreme.

Cook in his own words: http://www.afl.com.a...38/default.aspx

What type of player are you?

A mobile tall forward with the versatility to go back or play on a wing.

Isn't this what Niall is saying Watts is?

Darling, on the other hand, in his own words: http://www.afl.com.a...51/default.aspx

What type of player are you?

A hard, courageous and competitive player who brings other players into the game.

Which AFL player do you feel you resemble and why?

People say Jonathan Brown with his strength, courage and leadership. Lance Franklin as well because of his agility, speed and athleticism.

What are your strengths as a footballer?

Marking, ferocity at the ball, defensive pressure, strength, speed, endurance, agility and mental strength.

Isn't this what Niall is saying everyone in the competition knew the MFC clearly needed, given our light bodied focus in 2008? Cop a tip, I think it is.

No pick p1sses me off more than this one. It was just so obvious that, by the end of 2010, Darling more than Cook was the player WE needed at pick 12.

I think we have gathered this Ron from 1 or 2 of your posts

The cycle will turn .

Its starting to open up again now.

It looks to be right 'Fork 'em', the 3 + 1 sub is changing it a little.. I'm not sure if it's enough.

I think I'd rather see a 2 + 2 situation.

It would be really interesting 'tactically' as well.


Any chance you could get the actual facts of the matter Ron instead of getting off on your lack of them?

I wish he would.

It's like being repeatedly hit over the head with a sack of doorknobs, but he forgot to put the doorknobs in the sack first.

What's more damning is that by the end of 2010 the club seemingly still hadn't worked this out. Despite our clear need for a hard, power forward, it then picked Cook over Darling - ie, it picked yet another skinny, tall, mobile forward over a hard, power forward.

Here are the bios that were posted on the AFL website PRIOR to the draft. Our ineptitude on this pick is simply stunning. Cook may very well turn out to be a great player, but he's not what this club needs now or at the time we picked him. It's that simple. Criminal stupidity. Also decadent in the extreme.

Cook in his own words: http://www.afl.com.a...38/default.aspx

What type of player are you?

A mobile tall forward with the versatility to go back or play on a wing.

Isn't this what Niall is saying Watts is?

Darling, on the other hand, in his own words: http://www.afl.com.a...51/default.aspx

What type of player are you?

A hard, courageous and competitive player who brings other players into the game.

Which AFL player do you feel you resemble and why?

People say Jonathan Brown with his strength, courage and leadership. Lance Franklin as well because of his agility, speed and athleticism.

What are your strengths as a footballer?

Marking, ferocity at the ball, defensive pressure, strength, speed, endurance, agility and mental strength.

Isn't this what Niall is saying everyone in the competition knew the MFC clearly needed, given our light bodied focus in 2008? Cop a tip, I think it is.

No pick p1sses me off more than this one. It was just so obvious that, by the end of 2010, Darling more than Cook was the player WE needed at pick 12.

Easy Tiger, we still need the class as well.

What's more damning is that by the end of 2010 the club seemingly still hadn't worked this out. Despite our clear need for a hard, power forward, it then picked Cook over Darling - ie, it picked yet another skinny, tall, mobile forward over a hard, power forward.

Here are the bios that were posted on the AFL website PRIOR to the draft. Our ineptitude on this pick is simply stunning. Cook may very well turn out to be a great player, but he's not what this club needs now or at the time we picked him. It's that simple. Criminal stupidity. Also decadent in the extreme.

Cook in his own words: http://www.afl.com.a...38/default.aspx

What type of player are you?

A mobile tall forward with the versatility to go back or play on a wing.

Isn't this what Niall is saying Watts is?

Darling, on the other hand, in his own words: http://www.afl.com.a...51/default.aspx

What type of player are you?

A hard, courageous and competitive player who brings other players into the game.

Which AFL player do you feel you resemble and why?

People say Jonathan Brown with his strength, courage and leadership. Lance Franklin as well because of his agility, speed and athleticism.

What are your strengths as a footballer?

Marking, ferocity at the ball, defensive pressure, strength, speed, endurance, agility and mental strength.

Isn't this what Niall is saying everyone in the competition knew the MFC clearly needed, given our light bodied focus in 2008? Cop a tip, I think it is.

No pick p1sses me off more than this one. It was just so obvious that, by the end of 2010, Darling more than Cook was the player WE needed at pick 12.

Sounds like the second coming of christ......sure there isnt a little bit of Carey in him also?

Sounds like the second coming of christ......sure there isnt a little bit of Carey in him also?

Lol ... I'm sure there woulda been if he was old enough to remember Carey.

A splash of Ablett sr aswell no doubt.

Shoulda picked him on the size of his ego alone.

  • Author

Many on here claimed Fitzy was hopeless and should be delisted. He is starting to show his value and he hasn't developed yet physically though he is getting there. Watts and Cook may be the same and we could end up with those three and Clark making us pretty big and strong down forward. Also with Tom Mc and Davis we have some promising talent who are big and strong. Gawn hasn't even been mentioned and he can play forward as well.


Lol ... I'm sure there woulda been if he was old enough to remember Carey.

A splash of Ablett sr aswell no doubt.

Shoulda picked him on the size of his ego alone.

I'm still not sold on Darling, and am surprised by how easily some have been.

It's like all the gun kids at Geelong and Hawthorn - try putting them in our side and see how they go.

Darling would provide a contest, but his weaknesses would be that much more glaring.

We'd be no better off in the long run.

I'm still not sold on Darling, and am surprised by how easily some have been.

It's like all the gun kids at Geelong and Hawthorn - try putting them in our side and see how they go.

Darling would provide a contest, but his weaknesses would be that much more glaring.

We'd be no better off in the long run.

I haven't seen enough of Darling to be sold either.

The thing with Clubs like Hawthorn and Geelong , only their best and hardest working kids are getting a run.

Here are the bios that were posted on the AFL website PRIOR to the draft.

So the facts you are presenting about the correct draft choice are what the players say about themselves? Gosh. :huh:

I haven't seen enough of Darling to be sold either.

The thing with Clubs like Hawthorn and Geelong , only their best and hardest working kids are getting a run.

Unfortunately that may be the case for us too.

I haven't seen enough of Darling to be sold either.

The thing with Clubs like Hawthorn and Geelong , only their best and hardest working kids are getting a run.

Couple of things that impress me about Darling is his ability to compliment Kennedy & Lynch around the WC forward line, he plays the role of 3rd Tall very well - can he step up to 2nd or 1st Tall when the time comes? Only time will tell us that.

He also is very aggressive at the "ball carrier" which I like, but maybe just maybe this can be combated by his opponent on a few more occasions. Teams will work him out. Again without the cover of Kennedy, Lynch and the Cox/Nat can he continue to move further from goal. Again only time will tell.

However, what he has shown so far - our Jack could learn a heap from him. Could go down in history as one of the best "smoke & mirrors" bull-dust campaign ever. Credit where credit is due - well done Eagles. (Well maybe apart from the Heppell "snow job")


I'm still not sold on Darling, and am surprised by how easily some have been.

For a player you are not "sold on" you certainly give him some superb wraps above in relation to Fork 'em's quote.

How much better should Darling get? Hasn't put a foot wrong yet in my eyes.

We blew it.

For a player you are not "sold on" you certainly give him some superb wraps above in relation to Fork 'em's quote.

How much better should Darling get? Hasn't put a foot wrong yet in my eyes.

We blew it.

Rubbish.

For a player you are not "sold on" you certainly give him some superb wraps above in relation to Fork 'em's quote.

How much better should Darling get? Hasn't put a foot wrong yet in my eyes.

We blew it.

I'm not sure what wraps you're referring to.

To my knowledge I've given him none.

 

No need to say the same thing twice. One alias will do.

You know that I am not "Dr Who", stop being a smart arse.

And answer the question.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • FEATURE: 1925

    A hundred years ago today, on 2 May 1925, Melbourne kicked off the new season with a 47 point victory over St Kilda to take top place on the VFL ladder after the opening round of the new season.  Top place was a relatively unknown position for the team then known as the “Fuchsias.” They had finished last in 1923 and rose by only one place in the following year although the final home and away round heralded a promise of things to come when they surprised the eventual premiers Essendon. That victory set the stage for more improvement and it came rapidly. In this series, I will tell the story of how the 1925 season unfolded for the Melbourne Football Club and how it made the VFL finals for the first time in a decade on the way to the ultimate triumph a year later.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    Saturday’s election night game in Perth between the West Coast Eagles and Melbourne represents 18th vs 15th which makes it a tough decision as to which party to favour. The Eagles have yet to break the ice under their new coach in Andrew McQualter who is the second understudy in a row to confront Demon Coach Simon Goodwin who was also winless until a fortnight ago. On that basis, many punters might be considering to go with the donkey vote but I’ve been assigned with the task of helping readers to come to a considered opinion on this matter of vital importance across the nation. It was almost a year ago that I wrote a preview here of the Demons’ away game against the Eagles (under the name William from Waalitj because it was Indigenous Round).  I issued a warning that it was a danger game, based on my local knowledge that the home team were no longer easybeats and that they possessed a wunderkind generational player in Harley Reid who was capable of producing stellar performances playing among men a decade and more older than he.  At the time, the Eagles already had two wins off the back of a couple of the young man’s masterclasses and they had recently given the Bombers a scare straight after their Anzac Day blockbuster draw against the then reigning premiers.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 08

    Round 08 of the 2025 AFL Season kicks off on Thursday with a must-win game for the Bombers to stay in touch with the top eight, while the struggling Roos seek a morale-boosting upset. Friday sees the Saints desperate for a win as well if they are to stay in finals contention and their opponents the Dockers will be eager to crack in to the Top 8 with a win on the road. Saturday kicks off with a pivotal clash for both sides asthe Bulldogs look to solidify their top-eight spot, while Port seeks to shake their pretender tag. Then the Crows will be looking to steady their topsy turvy season against a resurgent Blues looking to make it 4 wins on the trot. On Election Night a Blockbuster will see the ladder-leading Pies take on the Cats, who are keen to bounce back after a narrow loss. On Sunday the Sydney Derby promises fireworks as the Giants aim to cement their top-eight status, while the Swans fight to keep their season alive. The Hawks, celebrating their centenary, will be looking to easily account for the Tigers who are desperate to halt their slide. The Round concludes on Sunday Night with a top end of the table QClash with significant ladder implications; both Queensland teams are in scintillating form. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

    • 126 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons hit the road in Round 8, heading to Perth to face the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium. With momentum building, the Dees will be aiming for a third straight victory to keep their season revival on course. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 562 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Richmond

    The fans who turned up to the MCG for Melbourne’s Anzac Day Eve clash against Richmond would have been disappointed if they turned up to see a great spectacle. As much as this was a night for the 71,635 in attendance to commemorate heroes of the nation’s past wars, it was also a time for the Melbourne Football Club to consolidate upon its first win after a horrific start to the 2025 season. On this basis, despite the fact that it was an uninspiring and dour struggle for most of its 100 minutes, the night will be one for the fans to remember. They certainly got value out of the pre match activity honouring those who fought for their country. The MCG and the lights of the city as backdrop was made for nights such as these and, in my view, we received a more inspirational ceremony of Anzac culture than others both here and elsewhere around the country. 

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Richmond

    The match up of teams competing in our great Aussie game at its second highest level is a rarity for a work day Thursday morning but the blustery conditions that met the players at a windswept Casey Fields was something far more commonplace.They turned the opening stanza between the Casey Demons and a somewhat depleted Richmond VFL into a mess of fumbling unforced errors, spilt marks and wasted opportunities for both sides but they did set up a significant win for the home team which is exactly what transpired on this Anzac Day round opener. Casey opened up strong against the breeze with the first goal to Aidan Johnson, the Tigers quickly responded and the game degenerated into a defensive slog and the teams were level when the first siren sounded.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland