Jump to content

Brett Clothier obliged to investigate Melbourne's 'tanking'

Featured Replies

Posted

According to Damian Barrett on Twitter:

AFL integrity alert: Given Dean Bailey’s comments today, Brett Clothier is now obliged to properly investigate Melbourne’s tanking

Those comments were Dean Bailey mentioning that he was setting the club up through draft picks, or something to that extent.

 

According to Damian Barrett on Twitter:

Those comments were Dean Bailey mentioning that he was setting the club up through draft picks, or something to that extent.

'Now obliged'...reads like Barrett is requesting the AFL to investigate given the comments made.

 

And in our defence we present Andrew Demtriou who is on record as saying tanking is not an issue with the. Doesnt exist.

Defence rests

Ok sure. I'm fine with that, on the premise that if we are punished, so too should every other club that has gained compensation draft picks. Carlton in the whole 2nd half of 2007, Eagles in 2008&10, Bombers & Richmond in 2007, Filth in 2005. Bulldogs, Hawthorn and Saints in the early stages of 2000's.

He can look all he wants, he ain't gonna be able to grab hold of something.


But he's right isn't he?

We have an ex-coach petty much declaring that he was an issued a directive not to win games of footy.

How can the ruling body let that slide?

bailey said that he put players in different positions in order to develop them quicker. which is 100% on the money - if he hadnt done this it would be remiss of him.

Bailey said this afternoon he was issued a directive to do what was possible to win games of footy.

edit: + 1 for Benno too.

 

Barrett is way off the mark here. Bailey's comments were simply that the club put itself in a position to strengthen itself through the draft. The way I read it, he was saying that more players were axed than might have been normal, in order to maximise the number of draft picks we had, in order to build out list up using the draft as the prime mechanism (i.e. as opposed to trading etc.)

Call me naive if you like, but I think Barrett is drawing a very long bow here. Mischievously so.


Saying that we will get more then likely get stung on the Scully compensation picks. Our club is a rabble.

Non-issue.

Damien Barrett isn't know as the purple-headed warrior for nothing - it's because he's a consummate d%ckhead.

According to Damian Barrett on Twitter:

Those comments were Dean Bailey mentioning that he was setting the club up through draft picks, or something to that extent.

Funny. That a journalist of all people, does something that will drive honesty further under the cover of darkness.


Another storm in a very tiny cup.

a very tiny mind....Barrett's !!

Perhaps a subtag on the thread title...

In the opinion of Damian Barrett

Ok sure. I'm fine with that, on the premise that if we are punished, so too should every other club that has gained compensation draft picks. Carlton in the whole 2nd half of 2007, Eagles in 2008&10, Bombers & Richmond in 2007, Filth in 2005. Bulldogs, Hawthorn and Saints in the early stages of 2000's.

He can look all he wants, he ain't gonna be able to grab hold of something.

^^^ This^^^ Why do journalist's continue to spruik that the MFC were the only club to do this?? clubs who don't once finals are a no go, are just dumb.

The AFL is just concerned about the TV situation....18 clubs will create more Tanking Vlad.

He also said on Triple M that we should have future draft picks taken off us. I think he is trying to create a new story out of nothing.

Typical journalist tripe.


I'm sorry, I must have missed something. (And I heard the whole press conference.) When precisely did Bailey admit to tanking? Anyone got a quote?

Mind you (yes, we've had this discussion ad nauseum) anyone who thinks we weren't tanking - or tanking under another name - against Richmond is naive to say the least.

 

"He also said on Triple M that we should have future draft picks taken off us. I think he is trying to create a new story out of nothing."

Ok they can have no.96 and 114 or whatever we cop this year.

What a legend.

I'm sorry, I must have missed something. (And I heard the whole press conference.) When precisely did Bailey admit to tanking? Anyone got a quote?

He didn't. He said he did "the right thing by the MFC" in that "he was asked by the club to play players in different positions". He has NEVER, EVER said he told players to lose a game. Demetriou himself said that resting players, sending others off for operations or playing players in different positions to see where they could play or if they could play was not tanking. End of story. If I was the MFC I would sue Channel 7 and the Herald Sun who FALSLY and I repeat FALSLY claimed that Bailey admitted we had TANKED. Anderson spoke to him tonight and said that is the end of it.

This attack on the club should not go unchallenged. Channel 7 and the Herald Sun have defamed Bailey and the whole Club.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 566 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

      • Thanks
    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 40 replies