Jump to content

Featured Replies

6 hours ago, Biffen said:

They must have commissioned a special trough for you.

I always suspected that BBO was the Trough Monster from the 1990's pub scene

 
3 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Very unfunny Biffen ………………………………. and the rest of you cheap mockers. All of you seem burdened by poor taste.

 

I must add that while I obviously do not have a trough, I did commission a very elegant chamber pot. It has a delightful (and  quite practical) gilt edge.

The downside is that the maid demands extra remuneration to evacuate it.

Being weird, kinky and a pervert does have its downsides! The poor chambermaids of Romsey, I'll wager a flagon of Kaiser Stuhl Rose, have abandoned you and you are plumbing the depths of Gisborne South, Clarkefield, probably as far awide as Sunbury. Yes, there are advantages of being an ordinary Joe from the suburbs.

2 hours ago, Moonshadow said:

I always suspected that BBO was the Trough Monster from the 1990's pub scene

He likes to take the pi55.

 
12 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Very unfunny Biffen ………………………………. and the rest of you cheap mockers. All of you seem burdened by poor taste.

 

I must add that while I obviously do not have a trough, I did commission a very elegant chamber pot. It has a delightful (and  quite practical) gilt edge.

The downside is that the maid demands extra remuneration to evacuate it.

That shouldn't damage the budget too much after you've processed the payments to her "management" and made the conversion back in to rupees. I'm sure you can chamber pot away without to much damage to the manors' budget.

Oh the humanity!

Instead of mocking my good taste in crockery and cars you buffoons should be sparing a sympathetic thought for our own @Earl Hood

I've heard he’s suffering a severe attack of the vapours over the going’s on among our beloved royal family.  


1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Instead of mocking my good taste in crockery and cars you buffoons should be sparing a sympathetic thought for our own @Earl Hood

I've heard he’s suffering a severe attack of the vapours over the going’s on among our beloved royal family.  

Our! Not mine Bbo. Last I heard they have again refused Earl any sort of honour so that must tell you something. I am all for Harry and the Yankee Sheila earning their own money. She could probably earn a reasonable salary returning to her previous occupation. Harry though might struggle but he might scrap in as a home dad. Charlie could probably find them a nice BV in Vancouver. Problem solved and the British tax payers have a little lighter load to carry. Everyone wins.

6 hours ago, old dee said:

Our! Not mine Bbo. Last I heard they have again refused Earl any sort of honour so that must tell you something. I am all for Harry and the Yankee Sheila earning their own money. She could probably earn a reasonable salary returning to her previous occupation. Harry though might struggle but he might scrap in as a home dad. Charlie could probably find them a nice BV in Vancouver. Problem solved and the British tax payers have a little lighter load to carry. Everyone wins.

Good heavens od, I must say I'm surprised. 

I thought you would show far more sympathy for our hard working monarchy.

Please don't tell me you're one of those anarchist/ republican rabblerousers !!

9 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Instead of mocking my good taste in crockery and cars you buffoons should be sparing a sympathetic thought for our own @Earl Hood

I've heard he’s suffering a severe attack of the vapours over the going’s on among our beloved royal family.  

For heaven’s sake Uncle you know only too well that I have been in the Old Dart these past two weeks, not suffering the vapours but busy providing what little help and advice I can to our glorious Majesty. Oh what a tawdry affair I find at the Palace with that American upstart but the Prince is besotted so my counsel is futile, despite the fact as you know, Harry has always sought my advice in worldly affairs. 

Really you expect me to be involved with your petty interests and concerns at the Manor or at that lowly Demonland site when I am busy providing solace to our very own Prince Phillip. God bless his soul. How much more [censored] can he absorb from this new generation of Royal ingrates. 

 
2 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Good heavens od, I must say I'm surprised. 

I thought you would show far more sympathy for our hard working monarchy.

Please don't tell me you're one of those anarchist/ republican rabblerousers !!

Hard working monarchy BBO ? I've just been informed by a gentleman from Salford ( probably not a monarchist ) that the Royals originally obtained their status by dispossessing the poor and engaging sycophants to protect them and that they've been wielding power ever since. Is that how it went down for your antecedents in Romsey ??

1 hour ago, Earl Hood said:

For heaven’s sake Uncle you know only too well that I have been in the Old Dart these past two weeks, not suffering the vapours but busy providing what little help and advice I can to our glorious Majesty. Oh what a tawdry affair I find at the Palace with that American upstart but the Prince is besotted so my counsel is futile, despite the fact as you know, Harry has always sought my advice in worldly affairs. 

Really you expect me to be involved with your petty interests and concerns at the Manor or at that lowly Demonland site when I am busy providing solace to our very own Prince Phillip. God bless his soul. How much more [censored] can he absorb from this new generation of Royal ingrates. 

Prince Phillip and I share a love a multicultural festivals.

I am informed he caused quite an uproar when he requested the American perform a twerk for his entertainment.Despite the offer of a tenner.


Easy to see how correspondents can be conflicted on this significant issue of world order.

We cannot allow this next generation of royals to undermine the rightful roles of the monarchy. Before you know it there will be exposure of the illusion that all those on the public teat are performing non necessary tasks. This ideology was already filtering through to other political arenas. Trump in US, Boris  in UK and our own ScoMo who all promised little and delivered it.

Fortunately the bush fires have shown the need for governments and supported by the inspirational wishes of Chuck and her Maj the public can return to its state of torpor struggling again to find enough disposable income to maintain the banana industry.

11 hours ago, pineapple dee said:

Hard working monarchy BBO ? I've just been informed by a gentleman from Salford ( probably not a monarchist ) that the Royals originally obtained their status by dispossessing the poor and engaging sycophants to protect them and that they've been wielding power ever since. Is that how it went down for your antecedents in Romsey ??

In a proper well ordered society everyone knows their place.

42 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

In a proper well ordered society everyone knows their place.

quite so, uncle. i understand you do a sterling job as patron of the romsey serf club.

On 1/14/2020 at 9:18 PM, Earl Hood said:

For heaven’s sake Uncle you know only too well that I have been in the Old Dart these past two weeks, not suffering the vapours but busy providing what little help and advice I can to our glorious Majesty. Oh what a tawdry affair I find at the Palace with that American upstart but the Prince is besotted so my counsel is futile, despite the fact as you know, Harry has always sought my advice in worldly affairs. 

Really you expect me to be involved with your petty interests and concerns at the Manor or at that lowly Demonland site when I am busy providing solace to our very own Prince Phillip. God bless his soul. How much more [censored] can he absorb from this new generation of Royal ingrates. 

Stirling effort Earl Hood !!

No doubt you realise you have the full support of all the Loyalists down here in the Antipodean Colonies. ( I have ordered the maid to sew a bulldog motif on her smalls to show that The Manor is at your back)

Surely that elusive knighthood cannot be far away?

1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Stirling effort Earl Hood !!

No doubt you realise you have the full support of all the Loyalists down here in the Antipodean Colonies. ( I have ordered the maid to sew a bulldog motif on her smalls to show that The Manor is at your back)

Surely that elusive knighthood cannot be far away?

surely uncle, earl's membership of the hellfire club should be adequate recognition. knighthood these days has more to do do with sporting dross and theatrical types of dubious morality.


3 hours ago, daisycutter said:

surely uncle, earl's membership of the hellfire club should be adequate recognition. knighthood these days has more to do do with sporting dross and theatrical types of dubious morality.

Just between you and I dc. 
The good Earl likes to keep his association with the above club ..... shall we say discreet.

Again ..... just between us .... I believe he fits the “ dubious morality “ requirements quite well

5 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Just between you and I dc. 
The good Earl likes to keep his association with the above club ..... shall we say discreet.

Again ..... just between us .... I believe he fits the “ dubious morality “ requirements quite well

probably a good thing he doesn't get a knighthood, hate to see him go the way of poor old jimmy.

Edited by daisycutter
spelink

2 hours ago, daisycutter said:

probably a good thing he doesn't get a knighthood, hate to see him go the way of poor old jimmy.

“Poor old jimmy “ .... yes .... well .... I suppose it’s possible he was just .... errr ..

misunderstood .

19 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

“Poor old jimmy “ .... yes .... well .... I suppose it’s possible he was just .... errr ..

misunderstood .

you know what they say, uncle. "power corrupts and knighthood corrupts absolutely"

  • Author

I was just thinking, what would the NO T$ posters starting 18 look like.

As an AFL qualified Coach, I could see myself coaching the side.

Interesting to see the team we could come up with.

Hopefully BBO could play, as well as carrying the drinks.

OK guys lets see those teams and the reasons why players are in their particular positions.

Edited by Redleg


12 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I was just thinking, what would the NO T$ posters starting 18 look like.

As an AFL qualified Coach, I could see myself coaching the side.

Interesting to see the team we could come up with.

Hopefully BBO could play, as well as carrying the drinks.

OK guys lets see those teams and the reasons why players are in their particular positions.

Surely real qualifications won’t get you a role in this team Red.

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

I was just thinking, what would the NO T$ posters starting 18 look like.

As an AFL qualified Coach, I could see myself coaching the side.

Interesting to see the team we could come up with.

Hopefully BBO could play, as well as carrying the drinks.

OK guys lets see those teams and the reasons why players are in their particular positions.

OK Red, I'd like to nominate myself for the position of half-full-on-the-fence. I am actually getting better at this role as the years go by. Like a good wine actually.

  • Author
1 hour ago, Neil Crompton said:

OK Red, I'd like to nominate myself for the position of half-full-on-the-fence. I am actually getting better at this role as the years go by. Like a good wine actually.

Wouldn’t you be better Neil, in the back pocket, following your rover opponent down forward, to kick the winning goal?

 
2 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I imagine I’d be voted in as captain but before I commit I want to know who is doing the pre and post match rub downs

 

heard it was to be special robert and one of his flinders street bridge neighbours

and i'll put my hand up for b&f

Edited by daisycutter


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 115 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies