Thats where Ned Kelly got it wrong.

Had he been wearing a Pies jumper at Stringbark creek he could have gone up before the MRP and had his 3 shooting charges downgraded from intentional to reckless

Thats where Ned Kelly got it wrong.

Had he been wearing a Pies jumper at Stringbark creek he could have gone up before the MRP and had his 3 shooting charges downgraded from intentional to reckless

Too true

and probably been offered a schizen load to move to GWS

Thats where Ned Kelly got it wrong.

Had he been wearing a Pies jumper at Stringbark creek he could have gone up before the MRP and had his 3 shooting charges downgraded from intentional to reckless

Reckless Kelly - slightly humourous movie, but no Young Einstein.

He's having a laugh isn't he?

Daisy's appeal failed. Still out for a week.

Daisy's appeal failed. Still out for a week.

im speechless

I'm not so sure Jack, a few players have been given weeks in recent years for the slightest.

One was a Collingwood player if I'm not mistaken, possibly also a Saints players? In the pocket at the Dome?

Tribunal is satisfied that the conduct was intentional, as assessed by the MRP. The level three offence stands. With deduction for his good record the offence is worth 168.75 points and he's out for a week. :lol:

Daisy's appeal failed. Still out for a week.

Hrm...if his appeal failed already, he'd be out for two...

Ah OK, I didn't realise his good record still applied.

Thomas out - good news.

Daisy's appeal failed - still out for a week.

Hrm...if his appeal failed already, he'd be out for two...

Nar, it has. Just it was reduced to 168 for good behaviour.

Daisy's appeal failed. Still out for a week.

A mate of mine just told me he was following the proceedings on the AFL website where Mark Macgugan 'live' states the arguments the lawyers are making, allows people to post comments and answers some questions. But he censored any posts my mate made which commented negatively on the defence evidence presented. Typical sham AFL.

Hrm...if his appeal failed already, he'd be out for two...

Upped from 122 points with a guilty plea to 168 points, so still only one week.

Think they were grasping at straws suggesting the arm swing was aimed at the ball.

Think they were grasping at straws suggesting the arm swing was aimed at the ball.

Yes. I hope his coach doesn't think he was cheating by making such a patently absurd claim.

Think they were grasping at straws suggesting the arm swing was aimed at the ball.

Yeah, one of the more ridiculous defences I've heard. The ball was nowhere near at the time and in any event, I've never seen a player try to clear the ball from the bottom of a pack with a roundhouse. Ever.

gee, thats really sad

and i was so looking forward to watching him get towelled up on monday

I wonder whether that as Daisy's defense has been shown to be misleading whether Malthouse will come out and discuss the virtues of lying.

As Mick seems focussed on taking the moral high ground maybe he will tack on a club enforced additional weeks sanction.

hahahaha he tried "to knock the ball away" baaaaaaaaaahahahahaahhahaha

micky, cmon, lying is cheating...

i dont find him that appealing myself.....

We are in with a show this week make no bones about it. Match up well in defence, two of their best three out, our tails up ..... Said it in another thread, a QB boilover is brewing.

anyone watch 10 news quarters started laughing when they said he tried to punch the ball thought it was rediculous

i dont find him that appealing myself.....

Zing.

We are in with a show this week make no bones about it. Match up well in defence, two of their best three out, our tails up ..... Said it in another thread, a QB boilover is brewing.

Be careful. Collingwood players will be fired up to prove they can win without some of their stars.

Of course if we win, it will be because of their outs. If we lose excrement will be lowered onto us given the circumstances. Hmmm, a lose lose situation.....

lol trying to knock the ball away.... If I was on the MRP I would have been flat out insulted. The ball was already meters away from the contest, and Daisy had his head up looking at the play. He really deserves 2 but oh well, same diff to us. If Tappy was back I would have actually half wanted him to play. Anybody see Josh Hunt on the weekend against the bulldogs? Our Tappy is not too far off that level I reckon!

Be careful. Collingwood players will be fired up to prove they can win without some of their stars.

Of course if we win, it will be because of their outs. If we lose excrement will be lowered onto us given the circumstances. Hmmm, a lose lose situation.....

If we win this, it's a big win whatever the outs are. Their depth is excellent, ours is kids with under 10 games experience.

I fear their lesser names, one of them always seems to get under our guard, like Dick.

It's about time Moloney dominated the clearances against a good team, this for me is the key to getting close / winning, we match up well in a lot of places, but we need Moloney to lead the kids out of the middle.

Playing in Collingwoods forward half will be instant death.

Thats where Ned Kelly got it wrong.

Had he been wearing a Pies jumper at Stringbark creek he could have gone up before the MRP and had his 3 shooting charges downgraded from intentional to reckless

Ha Ha nice one