Jump to content

2009 Player Review - # 39 Neville Jetta

Featured Replies

Posted
Neville Jetta – At the start of the year, we didn't see Neville playing a lot, but he showed in the second half of the season he could be a dangerous forward. He has also got some physicality about him. Neville came to the club with a really determined attitude and didn't just want to play at Casey – he wanted to break into the Melbourne team. And to play 15 games was a real credit to him. With a strong summer, he will only improve on this year's performance – Sean Wellman on Melbournefc.com.au
 

i love the Kids agression , who could forget the tackle he laid on Sandilands

gives 100%, has good foot skills (although set shots are a worry), not the quickest going around, great pick up for a late draft pick

I can see him slotting down to a back pocket at some stage in his career, to become the next matty whelan

 
Not sure where he'll fit in to a good side to be honest. I can't find a position on the ground where he'll be better than most.

That said, it was a good season first up. Absolutely love his aggression and the way he attacks the man and ball. The tackle on Sandilands was a cracker.

thats my quandary...however i see the whole side evolving over the next few years and there will be some surprises as to where some find a home on the paddock.

He has something.. not sure what but has a menacing quality about him. One of a handful im looking to see big strides. Bit of an enigma ..a lot of promise.

I have not seen that much of him. but he's not the fittest, nor does he have any stylish kicking talent. But i can see him become a fantastic hard ball gets player, he has a strong body but thats all i see in him at the moment.

But as i do recal, he did have some very good matches with casey in the forward, along side Jurrah and Newton. Where he kicked a few bags.


He performed better than I expected but I'm still not sold on him making it.

Really good season for a rookie, the chance to be apart of our future is up to him.

As Nasher says, he is aggressive to a fault, will be difficult to drop when he is getting 7 or 8 tackles and 2 goals a game in our forward line.

To me, he is a role player; someone to keep the ball in the forward line with pressure and harrassment. Will he develop other areas of his game to keep a place in the 22?

I don't know. But at pick 53 (?) it's all a bonus from here.

Edited by rpfc

 

I agree with Bates Mate, considering Wrecker's gone, Wonna returning to the forwards and the midfield adding Scully and JT. Jetts would be a decent back pocket, with his aggression and wouldnt have many goal kicking set shots, which isnt his strength. Just hopefully he becomes stronger and kicking improves, could be like a Jarrod Harbrow.

There's a lot to like about the Jet (aggression at the man and ball, positioning, decision making) but there's also lots of room for improvement (rough around the edges in a lot of his work - especially kicking, and a bigger engine is an essential). All in all, a very promising debut year from a late draft pick.

If he can become cleaner with his ball use and improve his stamina and acceleration, a regular midfield / changing small forward spot in our best 22 beckons. Not a particularly gifted footballer, but I have the feeling that he's the sort of bloke who has the determination to ensure he succeeds.


He is modest in the stats department, and there's legitimate questions about him as far as athleticism goes...

But when he's around the footy, I get that feeling something's going to happen. He doesn't appear to be predictable. Probably one of the more interesting players to look at over the next few years.

You'd have to say unless it all goes HORRIBLY wrong next year, he'll be offered another 2 years, which would take him through to the end of 2012... At which time a real decision will be made.

Edited by Dappa Dan

I agree with Bates Mate, considering Wrecker's gone, Wonna returning to the forwards and the midfield adding Scully and JT. Jetts would be a decent back pocket

I don't think he has the atleticism to go with the smaller forwards we'd want him to play on, does he?

I don't think he has the atleticism to go with the smaller forwards we'd want him to play on, does he?

I think that's Bennel's role, but he'll be more attacking than Whelan when he has the ball.

Nev and Aussie will both look to be playing a similar role of forward pocket / flank with stints in the midfield.

Adam Maric is in the same boat.


Anyone not convinced about Jetta needs to watch the round 21 game V's Carlton. Looked classy that day. 24 touches and 2 goals.

Yes a real breakthrough game, and thought he looked very confident. i can see him being a player with plenty of mongrel and a touch of flair. Has the angry pills Jeff Farmer used to take, but hopefully not quite as hot collared.

I think that's Bennel's role, but he'll be more attacking than Whelan when he has the ball.

Nev and Aussie will both look to be playing a similar role of forward pocket / flank with stints in the midfield.

Adam Maric is in the same boat.

I hope Bennel can push up to a wing in the next year or two love his poise and disposal

- Carlton game, Jetta features in a fair few highlights.

Jetta showed some good tricks and aggression for one so young but I have concerns over his ability to play small forward or back due to his lack of pace. Could become a good midfielder if he can build his endurance as he knows how to find it and is clean but otherwise am unsure where he fits in the scheme of things.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 84 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 19 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 21 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 289 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Carlton

    It's Game Day and Clarry's 200th game and for anyone who hates Carlton as much as I do this is our Grand Final. Go Dees.

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Like
    • 669 replies
  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 0 replies