Jump to content

monoccular

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by monoccular

  1. Defensive UNIT is the best I have ever seen it
  2. Playing for Freo?
  3. Far more interference to Frit than to the Freo goal - of course ignored.
  4. What a 🐂💩free and goal. Absolutely no contact.
  5. Incorrect disposal and Jamgdon took advantage -WTF 50 to FEEO.
  6. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I wonder ifMr Christian was watching closely last night. I saw two slam tackles with the head banging into the ground, and two hip to head causing concussion. Were the tacklers wearing red and blue all would be suspended 2-3 weeks without a shadow of doubt. This is a real test for him and the sanctimonious AFL of their impartiality.
  7. monoccular replied to adonski's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Not so sure about point 2. Or the second part of 3. But yes, if the price is right and we get a sports psychologist to screen him first. Not if he costs us players or too much cap space.
  8. Bowey?
  9. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Has HTB been removed from the rule book?
  10. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    OMG. Really? The two worst voices and a waffling [censored] (whose voice is ok though.)
  11. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Will Frankenstein be suspended for the hip to the head, Mr Impartial Christian? No. Nothing to see.
  12. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I was very confused. For a few moments I thought Port Adelaide must have shown up. My hobby horse - running headlong into a pack or a player (Butters) must be penalised, and possibly suspended.
  13. Especially just two weeks after the friggin’ bye. Somehow the stuffed shirts at HQ need to work out a senior and a feeder competitive without byes.
  14. monoccular replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Hawks are mobile - sent them to Tassie 1858 - I suspect more than a few Hawks fans bought at Waverley Park for just that reason - and are probably feeling very [censored] off that they are moving again. “… Are there other medical / useful businesses in the proximity that provide useful synergies around remaining there? ..” I misread the word synergies as syringes and immediately thought of The Hangar Pity we didn’t put the word on Alan Stockdale when he held the state pursestrings.
  15. I would only booooo IF he did something on the ground that would warrant such a reaction to any other player. Otherwise I have moved on as has he. The reflex boooooing from Port and WCE in particular to any opposition possession or football action is just pathetic. Even brilliant goals or marks gets them going. 🤮🤮🤮
  16. monoccular replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I agree that Norf seems to have stuffed up big time here. But part of the interchange steward's remit is to monitor the numbers. What happens if the club has it right and the steward overcounts? Could change an important game like a GF. Surely they should be required to tell the club that time's up and not just lurk like a vulture waiting to assert their authority?
  17. Long range weather forecasts are about as reliable as Michael Bloody Christian!!
  18. You are sure of this - in the magic Christian 0.3 seconds perhaps?
  19. Well hopefully when he rolled he exorcised his curse.
  20. Kieren - great post and I agree with most of it. However this needs a tweak: “…..when did you, as a team, create success? When you had consistency & cohesion & trust. When you had the same 22 fellas running out to kick the sherrin,….” I think that “the same 22” may offer some stability but 2022 showed that basic the same 22 who got us the ultimate in 2021 has limited shelf life and a failure to renew cost us in 2022. That has been addressed this year, partly through necessity of injury and form collapses.
  21. But were the closed for Gleeson’s magic 0.3 seconds, or more, or less. Not that he of limited mental capacity, Mr Christian (was he a Bounty descendent by the way?) even made Mr Gleeson consider this vital piece of information.
  22. Wouldn’t it be logical that whilst he had his eyes on the ball most of the time he would have had to glance at the kamikaze Rozee at least mementarily? And what rule says that one cannot glance to see what is coming? I seem to recall that Gleeson somehow in the JVR case seemed to determine that his eyes deviated from the ball for 0.3 seconds - what absolute cr@p from Gleeson. How can that even be determined let alone be against any rule in the book? Gleeson seems to be able to make things up on the fly - he is a lawyer I guess and that is what they do. And you are surprised that what many may believe is a corrupt arm of a corrupt organisation comes to corrupt decisions? Starts with the inept Christian who didn’t even asses the impact correctly - took a guess.
  23. Hunter the innocent bystander: kamikaze Rozee the assailant.
  24. But the AFL "integrity of the game" mantra is that nobody has any idea of who is leading in the Downlow at any time - not even 2022 at a round or 3 before the finals. And Santa and the tooth fairy will be good to you if you behave.
  25. monoccular replied to dazzledavey36's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Interesting two multiple flag winning coaches, both of whom brought their teams up from the mire to sustained success coaching now struggling sides, leave in a matter of days. Is the fall from grace too much to manage??