Jump to content

Featured Replies

21 minutes ago, binman said:

  • I wonder if our high performance program is geared towards being in optimal shape on Kings birthday at the potential expense of this game (ie bigger block of training into this game then taking advantage of the 8 day break to taper into the pies game)

@binman I know it’s getting a bit of topic for this thread but I wonder if the opposite might be true for Collingwood heading into the Kings birthday game. They have a 10 day break before that game and a 12 day break after.

Would you be thinking that they will ramp up their loading ahead of our game and look to put in a really good block over that 22 period? They are top and can afford to risk losing one or two to be cherry ripe for the business end.

We might be getting them at a good time is what I hoping for.

Β 
3 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

There is no club in the AFL that would have the quality to replace Gawn. Hea a generational player.

Campbell of course would still provide a solid back up option. Completely different style of ruckman, but would at least give us a solid mature and experienced body to crash and bash.

I was choosing a slightly extreme example I’ll admit. My point remains about depth. However if your system is truly bedded down across your list you should be able to replace 3ish players from the bottom 15 at any given time and not suffer too big a fall in form. If you can’t you’re going to struggle over a season without luck. The thing with our depth I think once you fall past Laurie, Henderson and ?? you get into uncharted territory. Do Sestan and Brown have the ability? Anyway we’ll likely find out as we’ve just lost Spargo for 4-6 so the next injury to a running/small will likely see one of these guys get a game. In the talls we’ve got JVR and Jefferson and then we’ve got Campbell to replace Gawn, heaven forbid.

12 hours ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

I was left completely unconvinced by Goody's presser response on Viney's availability...

Definitely in doubt 🧐

Same here. Viney had not gone through full contact training so we have to see how he pulls up from that first. It's not ticked off yet.

Edited by Bay Riffin

 

If Viney doesn’t come up best guess would be Laurie comes in (despite my view he’s too small for AFL).

He and Culley were the emergencies last week with TMac which in my view makes them next in, Culley didn’t get near it against Preston from the stat sheet so that puts Laurie in the box seat.

Wouldn’t be shocked if Billings gets the call up out of the blue but I think it’s Bill. No other changes imo.

Should beat them, they’re going terribly. As others have pointed out Ross the Boss will make it the worst game of the round to watch but we should have enough quality to win it.

On 26/05/2025 at 22:33, 640MD said:

I do hope we keep AJ in the side.

He is not a great player. Well not yet, might never be. But he is physical. And we gave not had a physical player since the we’d went to essenscum

Sorry I will have my pill now.

You need physicality in your team and on every line, he brings that in spades.

Team orientated, selfless and can knock a few skittles down when the occasion arises.

His confidence will continue to grow and you never know he might bob up and take a couple of towering grabs and kick a couple of snags in the accompanying months.


2 hours ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

If Viney doesn’t come up best guess would be Laurie comes in (despite my view he’s too small for AFL).

He and Culley were the emergencies last week with TMac which in my view makes them next in, Culley didn’t get near it against Preston from the stat sheet so that puts Laurie in the box seat.

Wouldn’t be shocked if Billings gets the call up out of the blue but I think it’s Bill. No other changes imo.

Should beat them, they’re going terribly. As others have pointed out Ross the Boss will make it the worst game of the round to watch but we should have enough quality to win it.

Culley was taken off at half-time as the emergency

Saints are coming off 3 losses to GC, West Coast and Carlton

We should win comfortably

4 hours ago, binman said:

  • I wonder if our high performance program is geared towards being in optimal shape on Kings birthday at the potential expense of this game (ie bigger block of training into this game then taking advantage of the 8 day break to taper into the pies game)

I hope that's not the case

I'd be prioritising the game we have a better chance of winning, otherwise we run the risk of losing both games.

Β 
5 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I hope that's not the case

I'd be prioritising the game we have a better chance of winning, otherwise we run the risk of losing both games.

I think he’s referring to Collingwood upping the training not us

Interesting article in the Age about our game last week. Ch 7 are criticizing Fox/Kayo for calling the game from Sth Melb instead of the MCG.

I wonder where the call will be from for the Alice game.

Calling a game off the screen is sub standard to say the least especially if they are getting the same feed we are seeing


1 minute ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Calling a game off the screen is sub standard to say the least especially if they are getting the same feed we are seeing

They’ll have multiple screens running but it’s still not the same as watching live

25 minutes ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

Maybe he’s closer than Bill then?

I think Laurie’s more likely to replace Spargo than Culley. Culley will be there should Petracca, Oliver or perhaps Viney goes down.

I’d love Culley to get a game if say Sparrow got a niggle, a patch of games to see how he goes. I don’t like seeing players waste away playing at Casey.

I think Culley is a chance to come in if Viney doesn't get up. But I'm not sure we can carry both plus our other bulls in the same team


1 hour ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Interesting article in the Age about our game last week. Ch 7 are criticizing Fox/Kayo for calling the game from Sth Melb instead of the MCG.

I wonder where the call will be from for the Alice game.

Calling a game off the screen is sub standard to say the least especially if they are getting the same feed we are seeing

I reckon the entire channel 7 team will be there as it is a designated CH 7 game.

The Foxtel calling team till be calling from a studio aside from the designated boundary rider who will be at the game.

Apparently the callers at the studio have access to vision that the viewer doesn't while they're watching the game live.

2 hours ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

You need physicality in your team and on every line, he brings that in spades.

Team orientated, selfless and can knock a few skittles down when the occasion arises.

His confidence will continue to grow and you never know he might bob up and take a couple of towering grabs and kick a couple of snags in the accompanying months.

I think back to a few weeks ago when he took a mark and had the chance to put us in front late.
Missed but put himself in the position anyway.
Then popped up a couple weeks later and slammed the sealer off the ground with desperation against the Lions.

As for Viney .... Didn't they rule him out for about 3weeks?

Edited by Fork 'em

1 hour ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

They’ll have multiple screens running but it’s still not the same as watching live

Nah, not the same at all.
Watching live a player might intercept in the backline and the crowd will start roaring cause they can see the whole ground open up in front of him.
On TV you might see 3-4 meter either side of the player with the ball.
You don't know what his options are, if he even has any.

Edited by Fork 'em

6 hours ago, Cranky Franky said:

Danger game. We have a poor record in AS.

Lyon is a good tactical coach & while the Saints are ordinary they manage to pull off upset wins every year.

Id say every game for us this year can be described as a danger game. After going 0-5, it will be very hard to trust this mob again. Heck, even when we had just won the flag, i found it very hard to trust the performances... Apparently its a side effect from acute MCFSS

I checked the Betfair predicted scores and I reckon they are way over what will actually play out. I reckon whichever team that cracks 70 points will win this

Screen Shot 2025-05-29 at 3.51.18 pm.png


5 minutes ago, D Rev said:

I checked the Betfair predicted scores and I reckon they are way over what will actually play out. I reckon whichever team that cracks 70 points will win this

Screen Shot 2025-05-29 at 3.51.18 pm.png

If it’s 93 to 88 Ross will kick the glass out of the coaches box - he’ll be aiming for 50-60points each

If St Kilda park the bus we could be in trouble.

Let's hope we get a decent lead in Q1 and the game opens up from there.

If we are to go anywhere this game should be a regulation win

No chance Roo comes in for AJ

AJ offers more aggression and is better in the ruck

Β 
29 minutes ago, D Rev said:

I checked the Betfair predicted scores and I reckon they are way over what will actually play out. I reckon whichever team that cracks 70 points will win this

Screen Shot 2025-05-29 at 3.51.18 pm.png

Nah Alice is a fast track and renown for high scoring games

This is THE game to show we’re back. Win this and we’re 6-6 with Port, North, Carlton, Saints again and Eagles as five more must win games in the run home to take us to 11 wins. We would probably still need to jag one or two of Pies x2, GC, Adelaide, Dogs, Hawks to make finals.

Lose this game and we’d need to win 8 out of last 11 games with some tough runs in there. Probably season over.

Let’s stick with what’s working, win and hopefully win well enough to creep our percentage back up towards parity.

Out: Spargo

In: Viney

Edited by deejammin'


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 61 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Β Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Β 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Β Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Β 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 300 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies