Jump to content

Featured Replies

12 hours ago, Ghostwriter said:

I don’t know. I was just told that because Sandringham and Casey both have byes this weekend they’ve organised a scratch match which will be played at Casey Fields on Saturday.

Agree with the unfairness of Kozzie’s two praccies not being counted in his suspension.

PS Laura Kane’s appointment is one of the worst decisions made by the AFL ever.

Why so? Genuine question.

In the long list of spectacularly bad decisions by the AFL for this to be one of the worst is saying something! Anyway I'd be interested to know.

 
2 hours ago, godees said:

This is a very sensible decision by Laura Kane and is very different circumstances to Kozzy. Open your other eye.

Very different, he got 4 weeks so must be deemed worse than what Kozzie did (which shouldn’t have been a suspension anyway - Moore flopped).

Kane is undercutting the tribunal to do the Saints a favour cos they complained. Silly and sets a weird precedent. Do AFL players now get a discount for bye rounds when they could’ve played VFL?

On 01/05/2025 at 09:15, Ghostwriter said:

I asked Tmac if he’s seen the article about his amazing stats in defence. He said Ruby (his wife) showed it to him. I told him how proud of him we all are. He said, “Not bad for an ancient old bugger, hey.” 😅

I love TMAC he has always been so humble.

 
17 minutes ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

Very different, he got 4 weeks so must be deemed worse than what Kozzie did (which shouldn’t have been a suspension anyway - Moore flopped).

Kane is undercutting the tribunal to do the Saints a favour cos they complained. Silly and sets a weird precedent. Do AFL players now get a discount for bye rounds when they could’ve played VFL?

If you get suspended for 4 games in the vfl but because of the inadequate nature of the comp that means 6 I think the correct decision has been made. He now misses 5, which seems still too harsh to me.

1 minute ago, Roost it far said:

If you get suspended for 4 games in the vfl but because of the inadequate nature of the comp that means 6 I think the correct decision has been made. He now misses 5, which seems still too harsh to me.

It doesn’t mean 6 though. He gets suspended for games not weeks. 4 games suspension should mean 4 games suspension, always has. If the 4 games are scheduled over 6 weeks bad luck. Why should 2 byes make a difference if 1 bye doesn’t?

I also don’t think the bump was worthy of 4 weeks but that’s no reason to stuff around with it via the back door.


17 hours ago, Demon Dynasty said:

More like Ghosty gave it to him involuntarily!

For those who may have taken this the wrong way (not the first or last time on DL i'm sure), that was meant as a compliment to Ghosty ie; Tom is riding off the back of her reports

13 hours ago, jaydenh10 said:

are they playing two games this weekend or are we playing someone else? :

A win for St Kilda.

Laura Kane has approved under exceptional circumstances that Alix Tauru’s four-match VFL ban can start this weekend with Sandringham’s practice match against the Tassie rep team.

Will be available AFL R12 / VFL R10

@7NewsMelbourne.

also f this, kossi’s ban didn’t include the freo and north game so why does this?????

He who shouts loudest jay

We are too often the mild mannered gent

 
10 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

He who shouts loudest jay

We are too often the mild mannered gent

Would Pendlebury have got 3 weeks for the tackle Curtis was suspended for?

19 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

An in depth analysis of the lost opportunity on the possible 2024 trade of Oliver to Geelong by Jake Niall has just been dropped by the Age

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/the-multimillion-dollar-decision-how-demons-missed-the-boat-on-oliver-20250501-p5lvrx.html

Co-incidence or did they want Oliver to avoid the media.

The article is mainly about dollars and doesn't really contain much we have not always known

One source close to the discussions reckoned 75 per cent was where it might have landed, not counting Oliver’s potential pay cut. Geelong’s position was that they would stump up a certain amount – let’s say $850,000 – and it would be left to the Demons, Clayton and his management, to work out the remains (how much he gave up, how much money Melbourne picked up).

If so, the Demons could have saved close to a million dollars per year, with the caveat that they would not gain much draft-wise.

After reading what cats were offering l am happy to back oliver in to build his form back up


56 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

Would Pendlebury have got 3 weeks for the tackle Curtis was suspended for?

Highly unlikely Roost. He's a good bloke Pendles.

A large-ish fine and a slap across the wrist

14 hours ago, Ghostwriter said:

I don’t know. I was just told that because Sandringham and Casey both have byes this weekend they’ve organised a scratch match which will be played at Casey Fields on Saturday.

Agree with the unfairness of Kozzie’s two praccies not being counted in his suspension.

PS Laura Kane’s appointment is one of the worst decisions made by the AFL ever.

She is totally incompetent!

35 minutes ago, picket fence said:

She is totally incompetent!

Wow, incompetent not in caps, you feeling ok?

  • Author
2 hours ago, Outside 50 said:

Why so? Genuine question.

In the long list of spectacularly bad decisions by the AFL for this to be one of the worst is saying something! Anyway I'd be interested to know.

Laura Kane is insipid, just like Andrew Dillon. But at least he fronts the media, she has decided to decline talking to the media ever since she (mis)handled the situation where Collingwood narrowly beat North thanks to an absolute howler by the umpires. She made the mistake of publicly admitting to asking Brad Scott for advice (her predecessor) which is unprofessional.

That’s just one reason. I’m not gonna waste my time or anyone else’s time listing the many other reasons.

9 minutes ago, Ghostwriter said:

Laura Kane is insipid, just like Andrew Dillon. But at least he fronts the media, she has decided to decline talking to the media ever since she (mis)handled the situation where Collingwood narrowly beat North thanks to an absolute howler by the umpires. She made the mistake of publicly admitting to asking Brad Scott for advice (her predecessor) which is unprofessional.

That’s just one reason. I’m not gonna waste my time or anyone else’s time listing the many other reasons.

That is flat out not true

Edited by godees


2 hours ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

It doesn’t mean 6 though. He gets suspended for games not weeks. 4 games suspension should mean 4 games suspension, always has. If the 4 games are scheduled over 6 weeks bad luck. Why should 2 byes make a difference if 1 bye doesn’t?

I also don’t think the bump was worthy of 4 weeks but that’s no reason to stuff around with it via the back door.

He was on the verge of being picked at AFL level so it is effectively an extension of his suspension (more than the tribunal wanted or intended for him) due to the idiotic VFL scheduling.

5 minutes ago, godees said:

He was on the verge of being picked at AFL level so it is effectively an extension of his suspension (more than the tribunal wanted or intended for him) due to the idiotic VFL scheduling.

Should’ve picked him a week earlier then instead of sooking about it. But it’s the AFL where the rules don’t matter unless they want them to

  • Author
11 minutes ago, godees said:

That is flat out not true

Tim Watson was the channel 7 sports reporter at the time. He must’ve lied 🤷‍♀️

2 hours ago, Roost it far said:

Would Pendlebury have got 3 weeks for the tackle Curtis was suspended for?

No Phu-ken way!

3 hours ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

Very different, he got 4 weeks so must be deemed worse than what Kozzie did (which shouldn’t have been a suspension anyway - Moore flopped).

Kane is undercutting the tribunal to do the Saints a favour cos they complained. Silly and sets a weird precedent. Do AFL players now get a discount for bye rounds when they could’ve played VFL?

Agreed practice matches should have counted as they are AFL umpired and suspensions incurred carry though to the AFL season so it should count.


7 minutes ago, GS_1905 said:

Agreed practice matches should have counted as they are AFL umpired and suspensions incurred carry though to the AFL season so it should count.

Richmond included practice games in the Balta ban, so they must be valid!

4 hours ago, Ghostwriter said:

Laura Kane is insipid, just like Andrew Dillon. But at least he fronts the media, she has decided to decline talking to the media ever since she (mis)handled the situation where Collingwood narrowly beat North thanks to an absolute howler by the umpires. She made the mistake of publicly admitting to asking Brad Scott for advice (her predecessor) which is unprofessional.

That’s just one reason. I’m not gonna waste my time or anyone else’s time listing the many other reasons.

Sorry but asking your predecessor for advice isn't unprofessional. Personally I'm not enamoured by any leaders I see out there at the moment. Bunch of overpaid corporate wankers, most have so many bestowed benefits a trained monkey could fulfill the role. I mean the AFL is basically unbreakable. The hard work has been done. I could run it.

On 02/05/2025 at 15:09, In Harmes Way said:

Richmond included practice games in the Balta ban, so they must be valid!

Michael Long missed a couple of practice games after his hit on Troy Simmons!

Never Forget

Never Forgive

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 315 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies