Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

If we were to get him you would have to wonder how long he would be able to get a game in mid given we after drafted high end mids heavily over the last few years, seems an ungraded in a player like sparrow but then you have to wonder how much longer he has to outside depth

  • 3 weeks later...
 
  • Author

Going after Worpel makes me think either

  1. Clazz is more likely than unlikely to be out the door? Strange given recent commentary from the club but possible

  2. They think Viney is pretty close to being cooked - quite possible but contradicts the contract extension handed to him


1 minute ago, adonski said:

Going after Worpel makes me think either

  1. Clazz is more likely than unlikely to be out the door? Strange given recent commentary from the club but possible

  2. They think Viney is pretty close to being cooked - quite possible but contradicts the contract extension handed to him

Viney cooked in what sense? Nonsense

31 minutes ago, Dannyz said:

We are still pursuing Worpel according to Mitch Cleary

While plenty of reports he's going to Geelong. Like every man and his dog.

So many farms, so little time.

 
53 minutes ago, adonski said:

Going after Worpel makes me think either

  1. Clazz is more likely than unlikely to be out the door? Strange given recent commentary from the club but possible

  2. They think Viney is pretty close to being cooked - quite possible but contradicts the contract extension handed to him

Pretty obvious we need greater midfield depth and Worpel offers a bit of a point of difference to the rest of our midfield.

1 minute ago, Adam The God said:

Pretty obvious we need greater midfield depth and Worpel offers a bit of a point of difference to the rest of our midfield.

What’s the point of difference ? He can’t hit a target like the rest


3 minutes ago, Greg Schneider said:

What’s the point of difference ? He can’t hit a target like the rest

The point of difference for our midfield is speed. And his ball use yips are vastly overstated. He goes at Will Day's 69% DE and the much vaunted D'Ambrosio goes at 70%.

We should continue to show our interest in him even if for no better reason than to force Geelong to provide him with a bigger asparagus farm.

Midfield depth at genuine AFL level is always a good idea, though. A lot of our promising kids can play plenty of time across wings and flanks and if their sessions in the middle are against opponents tired from grinding out against the likes of Viney and Worpel, all the better.

Remember that the Petracca-attack tactic of yesterday was all about letting him take additional breaks early in the game, either forward or on the bench, and then sending him in during the third to be both brilliant and fresh.

All that grappling and bumping and getting from contest to contest is a heavy load for the chunkier bodies to carry, so sharing the burden there is just as important as having elite wing running like Langford.

And then Windsor and XL will come through and knife you before you know they are there. #2028Premiers!

1 hour ago, Adam The God said:

The point of difference for our midfield is speed. And his ball use yips are vastly overstated. He goes at Will Day's 69% DE and the much vaunted D'Ambrosio goes at 70%.

This is a good point but it does make you wonder where the club sees him sitting amongst Clarry and Viney though (and to a lesser extent Rivers)

Or perhaps it’s just a case of wanting to get good talent through the door and figuring out the rest later 🤷‍♂️

And when did our club say they were after him anyway. Sorry it was media was it. BS

18 minutes ago, demoncat said:

This is a good point but it does make you wonder where the club sees him sitting amongst Clarry and Viney though (and to a lesser extent Rivers)

Or perhaps it’s just a case of wanting to get good talent through the door and figuring out the rest later 🤷‍♂️

He'd be a major upgrade on Sharp for instance...

I'm also not convinced we're after him. But I could see why we would be.


12 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

We should continue to show our interest in him even if for no better reason than to force Geelong to provide him with a bigger asparagus farm.

Midfield depth at genuine AFL level is always a good idea, though. A lot of our promising kids can play plenty of time across wings and flanks and if their sessions in the middle are against opponents tired from grinding out against the likes of Viney and Worpel, all the better.

Remember that the Petracca-attack tactic of yesterday was all about letting him take additional breaks early in the game, either forward or on the bench, and then sending him in during the third to be both brilliant and fresh.

All that grappling and bumping and getting from contest to contest is a heavy load for the chunkier bodies to carry, so sharing the burden there is just as important as having elite wing running like Langford.

And then Windsor and XL will come through and knife you before you know they are there. #2028Premiers!

2028!! I haven’t given up on 2025 yet and am expecting 2026 is already ours.

5 hours ago, Roost it far said:

2028!! I haven’t given up on 2025 yet and am expecting 2026 is already ours.

2028 is a lock. The footy gods have been consulted by my personal alphitomancer. But do not fear, the other seasons are still opportunities.

19 hours ago, Dannyz said:

We are still pursuing Worpel according to Mitch Cleary

Not surprised we were after Worpel before he recorded a BOG against us 2 weeks ago.

Especially not surprised we are still after Worpol after he recorded a BOG against us 2 weeks ago.

42 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Not surprised we were after Worpel before he recorded a BOG against us 2 weeks ago.

Especially not surprised we are still after Worpol after he recorded a BOG against us 2 weeks ago.

Strikes me as a 'Goody type' midfielder too


1 hour ago, Dannyz said:

Strikes me as a 'Goody type' midfielder too

Round 9 Melbourne v Hawthorn Coaches votes

10 James Worpel

8 kicks 20 handballs 10 tackles 6 clearances 7 score involvements 71% disposal efficiency with 50:50 contest/uncontested possession split.

26 years old puts him right in the spot we lack in our age profile.

As a free agent it is a no brainer that we are interested.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 159 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 42 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Like
    • 327 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

    • 31 replies