Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, Sydee said:

Based on what Ive been reading on training reports that sounds v unlikely 

Hardly setting the world on fire in Match sims - still a very long way off it seems 

It's make or break for Jefferson in 2025. If he is still not in the possibles for round 1 I worry will he ever be? The fact we have selected a few Forwards/ second ruck types does not bode well for confidence by the FD. 

 
15 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

4 key position players in the side don't think so. Howes is a certainty to play.

Howe is 191cm. Hardly short 

18 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

Will there be a training session on a Saturday? I have Fridays off but am too busy Fridays but Saturdays I'm free. Cheers 

Training is on a Saturday when it’s a Captain’s Run before a Sunday match. So, you should have several opportunities this season. 😭

 
6 hours ago, picket fence said:

In the Hun Dees report today guess the ONLY PLAYER who wasn't rated?? Pathetic reporting from this newspaper!🤮

you sound surprised,its rag i have not read for 20 years

1 hour ago, old dee said:

It's make or break for Jefferson in 2025. If he is still not in the possibles for round 1 I worry will he ever be? The fact we have selected a few Forwards/ second ruck types does not bode well for confidence by the FD. 

Yep reckon he is behind Jonhson who I want straight in ,big body and agressive forward we have craved since neita and shcwart


22 hours ago, Return to Glory said:

I asked Chat GPT (as well as requesting a positive spin): The Melbourne Demons hit the track at Casey Fields today for an intense and focused training session, giving fans a glimpse of their preparations for the 2025 AFL season. The team worked through a variety of drills, honing their skills, refining strategies, and pushing their fitness levels to ensure they’re in top shape for the year ahead.

A standout moment was the inclusion of new recruit Jack Henderson, who seamlessly integrated into the squad. His energy and determination were on full display, and he’s already showing great promise as a valuable addition to the team.

While Shane McAdam will unfortunately miss the season due to injury, the team remains united and determined, with players stepping up to fill the void and drive the club forward. The Demons are rallying together, showcasing their depth and resilience as they prepare for a strong campaign.

The club has shared a training gallery from today's session, allowing fans to relive the action and see their favorite players in action. With the season fast approaching, the energy around the club is electric, and excitement is building for what promises to be an exciting year for the red and blue!

Stay tuned for more updates and get ready to back the Dees in 2025! 🔴🔵

Go Norsca.!!!

 
2 hours ago, Oxdee said:

Howe is 191cm. Hardly short 

This lad needs to play, he is  begging for it .   Will produce if given a good run.

46 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

How do you have a defence with May, Lever, Petty and TMac? 

Because whilst yes, tmac is tall he doesn't play as a KPD - he plays as a tall half back flanker

Howes and tmac are playing for much the same position I reckon.

And tmac has first dibs - he's had a great preseason and he was arguably our best defender last year.


1 hour ago, Roost it far said:

How do you have a defence with May, Lever, Petty and TMac? 

You don’t. 

45 minutes ago, binman said:

Because whilst yes, tmac is tall he doesn't play as a KPD - he plays as a tall half back flanker

Howes and tmac are playing for much the same position I reckon.

And tmac has first dibs - he's had a great preseason and he was arguably our best defender last year.

Would you pick those 4 in the back half together?

Edited by Roost it far

Don’t be surprised if Hore is in the 22 come round 1

1 hour ago, Roost it far said:

How do you have a defence with May, Lever, Petty and TMac? 

Don’t worry, at least one of them will be injured come round 1

I highly doubt that May, Lever, Petty and McDonald will all play against a Giants side that loves its small pressure forwards.

At Casey, during one of the intraclubs, it was Howes who went to Pickett late in the game when he went to full forward.

There may not be a huge difference in height between Howes and McDonald, and yes, Harley Reid made Howes look silly, but I'll be very surprised if Howes doesn't line up in round 1.  I'll be just as surprised if McDonald does.  Btw, McDonald has been good in the sessions I've attended, but the balance just doesn't work.


36 minutes ago, Gator said:

I highly doubt that May, Lever, Petty and McDonald will all play against a Giants side that loves its small pressure forwards.

At Casey, during one of the intraclubs, it was Howes who went to Pickett late in the game when he went to full forward.

There may not be a huge difference in height between Howes and McDonald, and yes, Harley Reid made Howes look silly, but I'll be very surprised if Howes doesn't line up in round 1.  I'll be just as surprised if McDonald does.  Btw, McDonald has been good in the sessions I've attended, but the balance just doesn't work.

You’re definitely right about the balance of the side being out with four tall defenders.

I want to see Petty forward in Round 1. TMac is a better fit, as he is more mobile. 

2 hours ago, binman said:

Because whilst yes, tmac is tall he doesn't play as a KPD - he plays as a tall half back flanker

Howes and tmac are playing for much the same position I reckon.

And tmac has first dibs - he's had a great preseason and he was arguably our best defender last year.

He turns like the queen Mary, will fly in the air for intercepts which goes from a good thing to a problem when 4 guys are doing it and whilst his ball use was mostly good last year (with brief dashes of very bad) he isn’t going to give the run and carry like a flanker.

I feel sorry for Tom if he misses out and you’re right he was our best key back last year, but unless Petty is moved forward I just don’t see it. I’m not a big Howes fan, he has to lock down a spot this year. But I’m willing to give him first go.

4 talls isn’t totally crazy and GWS have Stringer and Toby who both provide tricky match ups - arguably you could use Petty on Stringer and May on Toby. But they’ll also have 3 quick little guys buzzing around sweating on ageing defenders.

3 hours ago, demonzz said:

This lad needs to play, he is  begging for it .   Will produce if given a good run.

Has a great attitude too, does Howesy. Always super positive. Always keen af in whatever he’s doing. I reckon he’d be a joy to coach. 

On 19/02/2025 at 18:57, Return to Glory said:

Here's the slightly less positive spin from Chat GPT: 

The Melbourne Football Club’s Doomsday Training Run at Casey Fields

February 19, 2025. The once-proud Melbourne Football Club, now a shadow of its former self, staggers onto the training grounds at Casey Fields, where even the bright sun seems to shy away from the looming clouds of despair. The air, thick with tension and dust, mirrors the state of the team as they face an unrelenting onslaught of injuries, misfortune, and dwindling hope.

The training session begins with a faint attempt at match simulation, but the players seem distant, their minds haunted by the growing list of absentees. Jack Viney’s laps are slow and labored, an eerie reflection of the team’s decline, a reminder that the once vibrant energy of the squad has now been replaced by a palpable sense of dread. Even the simplest drills seem like an impossible task as the atmosphere grows colder, more foreboding with each passing moment.

Shane McAdam’s Achilles injury—an ominous sign—looms large over the club. He’s been sent off for surgery, leaving the team without another key player as they hurtle toward the abyss of an injury-ravaged season. The whispers of discontent grow louder; every player feels the weight of the world on their shoulders. There’s no respite.

In the background, the arrival of Jack Henderson feels more like a desperate attempt to fill a void than a true solution to the ongoing crisis. The club’s future seems uncertain, and each training session feels like one more nail in the coffin. The fans, once hopeful, now watch with growing unease, wondering if their beloved club will ever rise from the ashes or if this is simply the beginning of a long, drawn-out fall into obscurity.

As the session winds down, the team retreats, their energy spent. The future of the Melbourne Football Club appears bleak, a far cry from the glory days that now feel like distant memories. No one speaks of the premiership dream anymore. In the shadows of Casey Fields, all that remains is the crushing weight of reality: the end may be closer than anyone dares to admit.

That reads like the product of very artificial, low acuity intelligence. 

23 hours ago, picket fence said:

Nar mate, I'm fine, at beautiful Apollo Bay trying to crank a few Salmon! Away for another 5 weeks but rest assured reading all training reports with interest, back to normal reporting at Snake Central after round 2!!😎🪱

Mr fence - you worry about snakes at Casey, then you holiday near the Ottways? 😮😮🐍🐍

On 19/02/2025 at 14:51, The analyser said:

Tom Campbell certainly keeping Gawny  on his toes, which is great.

Very important to have a solid competitor : Majak Daw’s contribution to Max’s dominance in our 🏆is greatly underrated by any who just look at his AFL stats for 2021. 

Edited by monoccular


4 hours ago, Roost it far said:

Would you pick those 4 in the back half together?

Yes. 

Gator makes a good point about GWS' forward line having small pressure forwards, so perhaps not round one.

But it's best to think of the defence as a back seven, not six.

And it's worth noting that in OR last season we ran with Tomlinson, Howes, Lever and May.

And round one, albeit against a tall dogs forward line, we ran with Hore, Lever, May, Howes and Tmac.

1 hour ago, Fat Tony said:

You’re definitely right about the balance of the side being out with four tall defenders.

I want to see Petty forward in Round 1. TMac is a better fit, as he is more mobile. 

A fit Petty will be a real handful at either end this year

7 hours ago, binman said:

Yes. 

Gator makes a good point about GWS' forward line having small pressure forwards, so perhaps not round one.

But it's best to think of the defence as a back seven, not six.

And it's worth noting that in OR last season we ran with Tomlinson, Howes, Lever and May.

And round one, albeit against a tall dogs forward line, we ran with Hore, Lever, May, Howes and Tmac.

Personally I think if we're adapting our gameplan to me more attacking that has to start in defence. Windsor, McVee and Salem with Bowey as the seventh are my first picks alongside May, Lever, Petty/TMac. As for Howes, I think he's backup only still. I think he can develop into a best 22 but thats partly just hope. I'd love Adams to make it but from the gist of reports he's in the Jefferson camp of not quite ready/perhaps never ready. I think with the recruitment of Lindsay and if Petty stays our back 6/7 looks to have a reasonable future beyond Lever/May/Salem which shows the quality of recruiting over the last 5 years.

Edited by Roost it far

 

TMac's form must beg the question. Does the team persist with Petty forward and allow TMac to play as the third tall in defence? I realise Petty's form last season wasn't great but he was coming off no preseason and a nasty injury. I guess if TMac is able which he certainly appears to be then who becomes the best forward option out of Petty, Johnson and Jefferson? Personally I like Petty in defence and feel he's the obvious May replacement next year but TMac's inability to age keeps the question open I think.

Edited by Roost it far

15 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

Personally I think if we're adapting our gameplan to me more attacking that has to start in defence. Windsor, McVee and Salem with Bowey as the seventh are my first picks alongside May, Lever, Petty/TMac. As for Howes, I think he's backup only still. I think he can develop into a best 22 but thats partly just hope. I'd love Adams to make it but from the gist of reports he's in the Jefferson camp of not quite ready/perhaps never ready. I think with the recruitment of Lindsay and if Petty stays our back 6/7 looks to have a reasonable future beyond Lever/May/Salem which shows the quality of recruiting over the last 5 years.

We're not adapting our game plan. As goody noted we were trying to implement a fast transition game for much of last year.

And yet, despite that we went tall down back in the first third of last season.

But you make a good point about Windsor going back changing the mix, though you could argue he is replacing Rivers, who didn't start playing midfield 'till the last third of the season.

Leaving the mix of talls and mediums aside, I just can't see tmac not playing down back round one.

One of best defenders last year, is having one of his best preseasons ever - and the first in years where he has no foot issues.

Can run all day, and whilst I agree with DS that he has turning circle of a boat, he looks in ripping nick and is as thin and athletic as ive ever seen him.

I'd add that he is one of our most reliable field kicks, which is absolutely critical to being able to implement a transition method.

Turnovers from defence kill teams these days. May and Lever ate both very hit and miss with those short 20 to 30 kicks out of defence that are so important. Tmac on the other hand is rock solid.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 134 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 415 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies