Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

Even if we could get him, Reid doesn't look good cultural fit for us...

We have culture?

Sorry mate but thatโ€™s the same rationale that stopped us drafting Dusty.

ย 
57 minutes ago, Beetle said:

We have culture?

Sorry mate but thatโ€™s the same rationale that stopped us drafting Dusty.

We drafted Clarry and Trac and are now imploding, but I guess you're right. The leadership needs to be better next time.

Great more problems. I'm trying to run a business here which is that business of my own sanity on a weekend and these things are like inconvenient employees coming to me with problems.

I have problems of my own.

Edited by layzie

 
5 hours ago, 3183 Dee said:

To me, it Speaks volumes about the way the club has/is being run.

You do realize that Richmond players have done the same and their club gave them even more than what we did.?

3 hours ago, Adam The God said:

Even if we could get him, Reid doesn't look good cultural fit for us...

Mate. Get Reid back to any Victorian club with any semblance of senior players worth a pinch of [censored]. Theyโ€™d have his head pulled in and playing properly.

West Coast are Melb of 2007-2013 right now and they have 2 more years until they hit 2013!


6 minutes ago, Doug Reemer said:

Mate. Get Reid back to any Victorian club with any semblance of senior players worth a pinch of [censored]. Theyโ€™d have his head pulled in and playing properly.

West Coast are Melb of 2007-2013 right now and they have 2 more years until they hit 2013!

Very fair. And the fish bowl probably doesn't help.

Edited by Adam The God

5 hours ago, BW511 said:

Itโ€™s going to take a really good couple of years before players start considering us for trades.

This. Can't be emphasised enough. And if we sack the coach it'll become even more true.

Not having a CEO isn't helping either.

5 hours ago, Adam The God said:

Even if we could get him, Reid doesn't look good cultural fit for us...

Itโ€™ll take a very strong club to get the best out him. i donโ€™t think heโ€™ll make it tbh.

ย 

Anyone on this forum ever played in a team that lost more than five games in a row. I have and you got dirtier and dirtier every game. I coached a school team that hadn't won a game for nearly two years. They had it but it just wasn't happening. Eventually when they all realised that they were good , they satisfied themselves and went in different directions in life.

6 hours ago, Adam The God said:

Even if we could get him, Reid doesn't look good cultural fit for us...

exactly complete [censored], focuses more on getting in fights and giving [censored] to the crowd instead of actually playing footy


7 hours ago, bing181 said:

If Goodwin goes (one way or another) Pickett will be next out the door.

And won't be alone I imagine.

Yep. Wouldnโ€™t want to rock the boat too much. If you thought 0-5 was bad, imagine how bad it would be without Goody!!

With Kozzy out the door at season's end guys, the old question arises a la LJ in 2022 whose body was on the field but heart & mind wasn't...

Should we be getting games into the likes of Brown (he's ready now) and Culley (if he hits some serious form / fitness at Casey at some point) from here on in instead?

Edited by Demon Dynasty

17 hours ago, bing181 said:

This. Can't be emphasised enough. And if we sack the coach it'll become even more true.

Not having a CEO isn't helping either.

Well, I can tell you there are plenty of players who weโ€™ve approached in recent times only to be rebuffed due to our style of play amongst other reasons.

Kozzy himself was unhappy with our style of play. His end of season review in 22 or 23, made that very clear.

Another is a Coleman Medalist who was worried about how we move the ball forward.

Sacking the coach might have the opposite effect to what you suggest.

Now not having a CEO is a different story, we donโ€™t look appealing to agents, hence they advise their clients accordingly.

Itโ€™s be traded to the Eagles or stay.

31 minutes ago, JJJ said:

Well, I can tell you there are plenty of players who weโ€™ve approached in recent times only to be rebuffed due to our style of play amongst other reasons.

Kozzy himself was unhappy with our style of play. His end of season review in 22 or 23, made that very clear.

Another is a Coleman Medalist who was worried about how we move the ball forward.

Sacking the coach might have the opposite effect to what you suggest.

Now not having a CEO is a different story, we donโ€™t look appealing to agents, hence they advise their clients accordingly.

Harry McKay?

Im not a fan of him regardless.

So we get Freoโ€™s first pick this year and next, both potentially mid to late teens for arguably our best player. Sounds fairโ€ฆ.


If he wants to go west then to the highest bidder it shall be.

He's contractrd and we are in ABSOLUTELY no position to sell ourselves short!

31 minutes ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

So we get Freoโ€™s first pick this year and next, both potentially mid to late teens for arguably our best player. Sounds fairโ€ฆ.

If itโ€™s freo im demanding Murphy Reid and a pick.

43 minutes ago, JJJ said:

Well, I can tell you there are plenty of players who weโ€™ve approached in recent times only to be rebuffed due to our style of play amongst other reasons.

Kozzy himself was unhappy with our style of play. His end of season review in 22 or 23, made that very clear.

Another is a Coleman Medalist who was worried about how we move the ball forward.

Sacking the coach might have the opposite effect to what you suggest.

Now not having a CEO is a different story, we donโ€™t look appealing to agents, hence they advise their clients accordingly.

Maybe, but had we kicked straight in 2023, it could be a very different story.

Playing our old method, minus Trac and half fit Clarry, we lost to Port by 2 points (prelim finalist), GWS by 2 points (semi finalist) and by 5 points against the eventual Premiers in Brisbane after a soft free was paid to hand them the winning goal.

Put Trac back in that team, a fitter Oliver (apparently not), allow our guys to play the contest game they've honed; add the ball use from Langford, Lindsay, Windsor and McVee; and exploit the greater pace on the list from Lindsay, Windsor and Kolt, and away we go.

This is why I was buoyant going in 2025. I thought we'd play essentially the same game style with a greater emphasis on being able to score off turnover.

We've gone away from this trying to play something that has clearly killed the instincts of the players, to the point where there is no identifiable brand or game style on display now and the players appear confused.

We should return to contest, stoppage and defence. We should even consider playing a hybrid of the territory game.

The next evolution of the game will be defensive and that is what we've built our success on and built our list for.

11 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

Maybe, but had we kicked straight in 2023, it could be a very different story.

Playing our old method, minus Trac and half fit Clarry, we lost to Port by 2 points (prelim finalist), GWS by 2 points (semi finalist) and by 5 points against the eventual Premiers in Brisbane after a soft free was paid to hand them the winning goal.

Put Trac back in that team, a fitter Oliver (apparently not), allow our guys to play the contest game they've honed; add the ball use from Langford, Lindsay, Windsor and McVee; and exploit the greater pace on the list from Lindsay, Windsor and Kolt, and away we go.

This is why I was buoyant going in 2025. I thought we'd play essentially the same game style with a greater emphasis on being able to score off turnover.

We've gone away from this trying to play something that has clearly killed the instincts of the players, to the point where there is no identifiable brand or game style on display now and the players appear confused.

We should return to contest, stoppage and defence. We should even consider playing a hybrid of the territory game.

The next evolution of the game will be defensive and that is what we've built our success on and built our list for.

There is a reason why Adelaide and Hawthorn won't truly contend- they can be scored heavily against too easily. It won't hold up in finals.

But even if we go back to those fundamentals as you say, we are still horrid moving the ball forward. It wasn't just inaccuracy that killed us in 2023. We went forward against the Pies about 60 times and kept kicking it down Sidebottom's throat. The same issue persists. We can defend like superstars. It won't make a difference.

5 minutes ago, praha said:

There is a reason why Adelaide and Hawthorn won't truly contend- they can be scored heavily against too easily. It won't hold up in finals.

But even if we go back to those fundamentals as you say, we are still horrid moving the ball forward. It wasn't just inaccuracy that killed us in 2023. We went forward against the Pies about 60 times and kept kicking it down Sidebottom's throat. The same issue persists. We can defend like superstars. It won't make a difference.

We're terrible moving the ball partly because the players aren't on the same wave length.

In 2023 we didn't have Windsor, Lindsay, Langford or Kolt. All much better users of the footy than Viney, Oliver and Petracca.


10 minutes ago, praha said:

There is a reason why Adelaide and Hawthorn won't truly contend- they can be scored heavily against too easily. It won't hold up in finals.

But even if we go back to those fundamentals as you say, we are still horrid moving the ball forward. It wasn't just inaccuracy that killed us in 2023. We went forward against the Pies about 60 times and kept kicking it down Sidebottom's throat. The same issue persists. We can defend like superstars. It won't make a difference.

This

1 hour ago, JJJ said:

Sacking the coach might have the opposite effect to what you suggest.

Don't disagree entirely with what you're saying. But my point was that some of the players are very close to Goodwin (including Kozzie), and if Simon goes these players may see it as a time to move on as well.

Edited by bing181

11 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

We're terrible moving the ball partly because the players aren't on the same wave length.

In 2023 we didn't have Windsor, Lindsay, Langford or Kolt. All much better users of the footy than Viney, Oliver and Petracca.

During Collingwoodโ€™s last two wins against Carlton and Sydney they had a lot of very ordinary delivery inside their fwd 50 but it went in quick and went into an open fwd line to sone dangerous fwds ie Elliot / Hill / DeGoey in one on ones. The skill of their fwds turned ordinary delivery (sometimes for to opposition pressure, sometimes due to poor kicking) into goals because of their ability to beat their opponent and having space to work in.

GWS and Brisbane are the only teams Iโ€™d consider to have elite kicks arcoss all lines over the ground, GWS being the most balanced side in the competition.

ย 
13 minutes ago, bing181 said:

Don't disagree entirely with what you're saying. But my point was that some of the players are very close to Goodwin (including Kozzie), and if Simon goes these players may well see it as a time to move on as well.

Was Kosi not going last season if he could? At that point Goodwin was contracted for two more seasons.

I don't think retaining players that want to go is a good enough reason for keeping Goody. Why are they trying to leave?

Edited by Adam The God


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demonsโ€™ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 87 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last yearโ€™s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Clubโ€™s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.ย Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Letโ€™s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the teamโ€™s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and โ€ฆ it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterdayโ€™s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourneโ€™s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldnโ€™t get any worse. Well, it did. And whatโ€™s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasnโ€™t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyonโ€™s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourneโ€™s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourneโ€™s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterdayโ€™s 7 goals 21 behinds.ย 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. Iโ€™ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?ย Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?ย 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 317 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies