Nothing in that either...

#FreeKickPort

Another [censored] goal. [censored] this is too obvious 

15 minutes ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

"Review Complete... For [censored] Sake... It was miles over"

Even if it wasn't he only fully had control when the entire ball was over the line.  Throw in every day.

1 minute ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Nothing in that either...

#FreeKickPort

If every one of those would be paid, there would be 20 more free kicks every game. 

10-1 second half and another charity goal.

1 minute ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Another [censored] goal. [censored] this is too obvious.

It's only the saints. Not Carlton or the pies

Take the non goals from the out of bounds mark and Dixon's charity and the Saints would only be 3 points down right now

Edited April 26, 20241 yr by Demon Dynasty

Umps are terrible

Do we prefer any result in this game? 

Even if the Saints got close the umps would pull something out of their arzz to ensure these pretenders win

This is unwatchable. The umpiring is crippling what might’ve been a good match. It’s so unfair, I’m absolutely furious and I’m not even a Saints supporter. And the hardest part about it is that nothing will be done about it. 

1 minute ago, BoBo said:

Do we prefer any result in this game? 

What difference does it make? Port were always gonna win. 

Saints should lodge a complaint about the umpiring.

Disgraceful.

1 minute ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

What difference does it make? Port were always gonna win. 

At risk of being made a fool, I reckon saints have this. I don’t know which result is better for us to be honest 

If the Saints win this they deserve eight points. This is an uphill battle for them because they’re playing while hobbled by the atrocious umpiring. 

2 hours ago, Jibroni said:

Saints trying to give Fremantle a run for most boring team in the AFL.

Ross Lyon - how long since he ran out on Freo?  Hangover still?

1 hour ago, whatwhat say what said:

how many weeks for higgins

4.  Or is he on the AFL darling list?

Just now, BoBo said:

At risk of being made a fool, I reckon saints have this. I don’t know which result is better for us to be honest 

The Saints DO have this… that is, they should have this, only they’re being stymied by blatantly unfair umpiring 

I am in shock at this umpiring display 

3 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

The Saints DO have this… that is, they should have this, only they’re being stymied by blatantly unfair umpiring 

Can’t argue against that… 

Bad umpiring aside this is just poor by the Saints. 

Put the umpiring to one side, Port have no one on the bench and St Kilda still couldn’t get anything going. 

Hate them or not, Port deserve that win.

I hate it when umpiring ruins games. 2-3 umpire goals in a 10 pt loss is just not acceptable in modern footy. 

Happens almost every game  in Adelaide.

What a joke that match was.  The result was NEVER going to be in doubt from start to finish.

Why even have a match?  AFL shld just say, we need at least one Adelaide team in the eight for a healthy comp and give Port the 4 points.  Save everyone the trouble.

Edited April 26, 20241 yr by Demon Dynasty

If King was playing the Saints win that 

Port are not a threat

4 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

C’mon Titan, you can do better than that. 
that above comment is not worth responding to. We have had issues with Brisbane for a number of Seasons and you know it 

I can indeed do better. 

They’ve won 3 of the last 4 against us. But we’ve played them so much of late, that only goes back to September 2022. We won the four games in a row prior to that, including belting them in the last game of 2022 (their last loss at the Gabba until Opening Round this year).

So there aren’t really “issues” over “a number of seasons”. 1-1 in 2023, 2-1 in 2022. 0-1 so far in 2024 but let’s see how we go in the return game when we’re (hopefully) not on a 5-day break straight after a fortnight interstate.