Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, rpfc said:

Thanks TU. Without the time to research this in depth, I would argue we would have a few missed ‘gimmies’ most games, leaving the shallow and wide shots the more considerable culprit.

I would also argue against this growing point from a few that these are ‘reentries’ due to our high press.

That is what you get with a high press. That is by design.

Its a feature, not a bug. 

If we can’t maximise it and kick more than 70 points, we shouldn’t play it and we should sit back more and develop chains off half back.

So ‘reentries’ is another excuse for our poor connection and delivery into the forward line.

Excellent observations..

You also have to question the waste of energy.  It's not efficient..   its footy's version of scattergun. Just blaze away..push push push ....and hope.

The problem with this approach is you need a hell of a lot of skills in your bag to be able to pounce on that supposed deliberate loose ( forced ) ball.

There's no intent to control the ball.. it controlling the space and expecting the ball to follow suit.

This is quite simply ridiculous.  A team that CAN control possession will beat you every time ( all other things equal )

Edited by beelzebub
  • Like 1

Posted
12 minutes ago, Vineytime said:

I’m hearing Fritch is out for 6-8!weeks, having surgery today. 

Expected this news to be honest 

 

We Are Doomed Reaction GIF

  • Sad 1

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

How many goals have we scored in the last 13 or so games where a forward has led towards the kicker and marked out in front.

I am struggling to think of too many.

We make it so hard for ourselves.

Remember the Cats of 2021

Slow ball movement and over use to keep their possession / control of game going.

We were somewhat of a variation of that in 2022.... 

Difference is the Cats recognised their issues and changed things up.  Went on to win the cup.

We've gone for more of the same but just added an extra ruck (that has added nothing other than an assist to Max) and basically brought more of the same on transition in 2023.  Swapped Jordan out for his doppelganger Hunter.

Still playing the long game around the wings off HB with over use of HB.  That method and over use of HB sometimes works in the dry if you win the contest battle and spread from there effectively.  Certainly nb for us at times with Clarry in there.  Not so good in wet or greasy conditions, especially without Clarry.

The best teams are transitioning off HB alot faster and more efficient coming inside than we are, often through the corridor.  And most play wet weather footy somewhat differently.

In 2021 we were a surge team, in some aspects we had a few similar traits to the Tigers during their years of success but without so many smalls up front.

The 2022 / 23 Demons are a long way from that, more resembling the bogged down 2021 Cats imho.

Edited by Demon Dynasty
  • Like 1
  • Clap 1
Posted (edited)

Here's a quote from Robbo  - who I don't normally rate - but I think he is on the money here:

Melbourne plays density football. It’s a strong contest and combative team. They don’t play so-called easy football with spares everywhere. It’s labour intensive, man v man, which means their football is tough and grinding.

Our game style is very taxing. We make it hard on ourselves. Its an arm wrestle and tries to wear down the other teams. SG has shown no inclination to change that except for the finals series in 2021.

So maybe that is his go. Get to finals and 'flick the switch' as it were.

I can see why that makes some sense - get to finals - but there is a lot wrong with that if that in fact is the case. And it isn't an easy thing to change style late in the piece.

My observation is that during pre-season and the early part of this season we were playing a lot more daring football and kicking angles into the corridor. Hence our accuracy at goal as many of the shots were front and centre. But as we have seen in the past 5 weeks it has shifted dramatically to old style of kick along the boundary and bomb the ball into our fwd line. 

 

Edited by jnrmac
  • Like 7
Posted
1 hour ago, rpfc said:

Thanks TU. Without the time to research this in depth, I would argue we would have a few missed ‘gimmies’ most games, leaving the shallow and wide shots the more considerable culprit.

I would also argue against this growing point from a few that these are ‘reentries’ due to our high press.

That is what you get with a high press. That is by design.

Its a feature, not a bug. 

If we can’t maximise it and kick more than 70 points, we shouldn’t play it and we should sit back more and develop chains off half back.

So ‘reentries’ is another excuse for our poor connection and delivery into the forward line.

A serous question rpfc.

Do you think the way we play will change as we approach the finals, as it did in 2021 and 2022, with our scores going up and the game style being more expansive and looking like rounds 1-6 this year?

  • Like 2

Posted
11 hours ago, binman said:

Sure

In dry conditions.

And besides 77 inside 50s is very misleading.

I'm guessing half of them were reentries. Meaning the ball was coming back into a forward line with 30 odd players in there.

No space at all. No leading lanes. All but impossible to take a contested mark. Wet. Slippery. Chaos. 

We basically didnt score on transition. In part because the ball was in our forward half most of the time. Meaning there was almost always congestion ahead of the ball. And no overlap run meant no free players ahead of the ball. 

And again, its worth pointing out the giants scores to inside 50 efficiency was significantly worse than ours -  26% to our 36%. 

Unfortunately their goals to inside 50 ratio was a hell of a lot better than ours.

We kick straight. We win.

Yet we won the centre clearances 15-2, 6-6-6 ahead of them and we made virtually nothing of those entries either.

Our system is pretty dysfunctional atm and it is not just due to inaccuracy......Our gamestyle leads to not very good looks at goal.  Exhausting style to watch let alone play i would imagine!  The players are doing what the coach is telling them to do set up for repeat stoppages.  

Also i believe that Goodwin has got the selections massively wrong over last few weeks and it is hurting us immensely.

We were doing ok with Petty as a defensive forward that was starting to find to impose himself and come up the ground as a marking option.  In the last few weeks Stewart then Haynes destroyed us.  Both were allowed to do as they please.

It is some strange coaching, dropping Tomlinson then shifting the magnets with Petty who was really showing something as a forward, who actually helped block for JVR.  With Petty and JVR combo we at least compete in the air and on the ground.  We also lock down their best interceptor, which we 100% need because we choose to dump kick all day into F50.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Here's a quote from Robbo  - who I don't normally rate - but I think he is on the money here:

Melbourne plays density football. It’s a strong contest and combative team. They don’t play so-called easy football with spares everywhere. It’s labour intensive, man v man, which means their football is tough and grinding.

Our game style is very taxing. We make it hard on ourselves. Its an arm wrestle and tries to wear down the other teams. SG has shown no inclination to change that except for the finals series in 2021.

So maybe that is his go. Get to finals and 'flick the switch' as it were.

I can see why that makes some sense - get to finals - but there is a lot wrong with that if that in fact is the case. And it isn't an easy thing to change style late in the piece.

My observation is that during pre-season and the early part of this season we were playing a lot more daring football and kicking angles into the corridor. Hence our accuracy at goal as many of the shots were front and centre. But as we have seen in the past 5 weeks it has shifted dramatically to old style of kick along the boundary and bomb the ball into our fwd line. 

 

 Spot on jnr.

I didn't see this post before making my previous one.

'My observation is that during pre-season and the early part of this season we were playing a lot more daring football and kicking angles into the corridor. Hence our accuracy at goal as many of the shots were front and centre. But as we have seen in the past 5 weeks it has shifted dramatically to old style of kick along the boundary and bomb the ball into our fwd line.'

This is exactly right.

In a nutshell, it is my contention that in the middle of the season they don't have the run in the legs to implement the model you describe we employed in the first third of this season (and in the first halves against the pies and lions ladt season,and the back end of 2021).

But will employ again if we can get the run in our legs back. 

The interesting question is whether goody should modify the model now to mitigate the core elements of the game plan that make brutal and blunt now (forward half pressure, contest, reentries etx etc). Essentially adopt a new, or at least modified sytem.

Or if doing so risks players not instinctively understanding the system and the role they play in it come finals.

Goody has clearly gone with the latter philosophy (though had def made some adjustments this season in this mid year phase eg reinforcing the defensive focus, less rusky kick etc).

And one assumes that is because it will increase our chances of winning the flag.

 

Edited by binman
Posted
3 minutes ago, binman said:

But will employ again if we can get the run in our legs back. 

Goody has clearly gone with the latter philosophy (though had def made some adjustments this season in this mid year phase eg reinforcing the defensive focus, less rusky kick etc).

And one assumes that is because it will increase our chances of winning the flag.

 

A big IF for mine but maybe they have seen the back half of the season and concluded that it is an 'easier' run of games and there is time to build.

Rd 16 we are top 4 so things are all OK. Start to fine tune our form into finals with a hopefully healthy list. It has quite a bit of risk to it though but it is a long season

I maintain we changed the way we play for the Carlton game as a pre-cursor or dress rehearsal for the Collingwood game. We now know that works. Similar to what Geelong did against us last year - they revealed some tactics assuming they would meet us in finals. That gives me some comfort they have a plan they are working towards. A finals style that can win big games.

But the jury is still out for me and it seems like we are playing with fire a bit. A few things go wrong - like Fritsch - and we are back in the pack making life much harder for ourselves.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Love 1

Posted
1 hour ago, binman said:

A serous question rpfc.

Do you think the way we play will change as we approach the finals, as it did in 2021 and 2022, with our scores going up and the game style being more expansive and looking like rounds 1-6 this year?

You are alluding to the focus of the team changing slightly and that leading to higher scoring and better conversion.

That may happen but I am more interested in how it would happen; players need to alter behaviour and look shorter or with hands, we need to work into space and not sit in it in the forward line, and we need to make better decisions with ball in hand. There is no switch for that. 

It is being predictable, trusting your teammate to do adhere to the above, and trusting yourself to take the extra second that our pressure doesn’t allow others. 

These are simple concepts but I have seen teams flirt with form and be unable to regain the above. So much of this game is mental and there is nothing as simple as a switch when it comes to the collective mind of a footy team.

  • Like 4
Posted
18 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

A big IF for mine but maybe they have seen the back half of the season and concluded that it is an 'easier' run of games and there is time to build.

Rd 16 we are top 4 so things are all OK. Start to fine tune our form into finals with a hopefully healthy list. It has quite a bit of risk to it though but it is a long season

I maintain we changed the way we play for the Carlton game as a pre-cursor or dress rehearsal for the Collingwood game. We now know that works. Similar to what Geelong did against us last year - they revealed some tactics assuming they would meet us in finals. That gives me some comfort they have a plan they are working towards. A finals style that can win big games.

But the jury is still out for me and it seems like we are playing with fire a bit. A few things go wrong - like Fritsch - and we are back in the pack making life much harder for ourselves.

 

 

Agree on all points.

It is definitely a high wire act.

It is a fascinating question I think as to how much teams are prepared to risk losing in the home and away season to increase their chances of winning a flag.

I think the dogs and tigers fundamentally changed the  calculation for many teams. Both teams played a style unsuited to playing a full home and away season - as their results attested.  

But a style definitely suited to winning a flag.

Recent history is crystal clear, the brutal, chaos football the tigers introduced is the template - since 2017 the only winner play8ng a different style outlier was the eagles in 2018 (ironically after the tigers had their best home and away season almost ever, only to lose the prelim as 1.40 favs). 

If you include the dogs win (diff approach, but still  chaotic) six of the seven flags have been won by teams using very similar methods.

In that same period, the lions, Port and the cats (until they famously changed course ladt year) were brilliant performers in the home and away phase, and perennial top 4s, but couldn't get it done when it counted.

Fans happy rounds 1-23. Not so happy come finals.

Meanwhile, goody is in his seventh season as an AFL coach, has made finals in only three of those seasons (will be four this year) - making a preliminary in 2018, a flag in 2021 and our in straight sets last year (having earned a double chance).

I'd take that record over say, ken Hinckley, who despite having incredible resources, strong teams and a pronounced home ground advantage, has not even made a GF, let alone win one.

Much the same could be said about Fagan and the lions.

  • Like 3

Posted
Just now, rpfc said:

You are alluding to the focus of the team changing slightly and that leading to higher scoring and better conversion.

No, I'm asking you a simple question.

Do you think the way we play will change as we approach the finals, as it did in 2021 and 2022, with our scores going up and the game style being more expansive and looking like rounds 1-6 this year? 

I'm not asking how we might achieve that, I'm asking if you think we will go back to the way we played in our preseason and round 1-6.

It's not a trick question.

And It is really a yes or no answer - maybe is a bit wishy washy.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Expected this news to be honest 

 

We Are Doomed Reaction GIF

Well we somehow kicked 17 goals without him in round 1 with BBB, Pickett, Spargo and Gawn combining for 12 goals. These fellas are all going to have to step up in his absence and Trac will need to be a 50/50 mid-forward when Clarry returns and kick his 1 to 2 a week without fail.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Vineytime said:

I’m hearing Fritch is out for 6-8!weeks, having surgery today. 

From how bad the injury looked I would probably take this to be honest. 

  • Like 3
Posted
5 hours ago, rpfc said:

Thanks TU. Without the time to research this in depth, I would argue we would have a few missed ‘gimmies’ most games, leaving the shallow and wide shots the more considerable culprit.

I would also argue against this growing point from a few that these are ‘reentries’ due to our high press.

That is what you get with a high press. That is by design.

Its a feature, not a bug. 

If we can’t maximise it and kick more than 70 points, we shouldn’t play it and we should sit back more and develop chains off half back.

So ‘reentries’ is another excuse for our poor connection and delivery into the forward line.

I agree. Another stat I'd love to see (maybe @WheeloRatings can help us out) is our percentage of scoring chains from the back half vs from the front half. It feels like recently our scores are coming from forward half turnovers/stoppages a lot more than earlier in the year when we were able to generate more scores from our back half.

If you look at our xScore maps from our earlier games, we were taking a similar spread of shots but were nailing the easier shots. For example, we were efficient vs GC:

 

Posted
3 hours ago, binman said:

No, I'm asking you a simple question.

Do you think the way we play will change as we approach the finals, as it did in 2021 and 2022, with our scores going up and the game style being more expansive and looking like rounds 1-6 this year? 

I'm not asking how we might achieve that, I'm asking if you think we will go back to the way we played in our preseason and round 1-6.

It's not a trick question.

And It is really a yes or no answer - maybe is a bit wishy washy.

Without being rude, B, but how the F am I supposed to know if we will pull our collective fingers out? You don’t either, you hope we will as do I.

I am trying to make the point that it is not a fait accompli that we return to the healthier movement, use of space, and delivery into the forward line that we have seen previously. ESPECIALLY, considering this was the original sin of this team in through 2020 - pumping the ball forward into nothingness.

Personally, I think they need the leaders to take on the game more and take that extra half second and lower their eyes AND they may need to pair that with pulling back the press a bit to allow us to have more space to move the footy with confidence. It’s too suffocating and we have no space for structure and space to move into.

  • Like 1

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, rpfc said:

Without being rude, B, but how the F am I supposed to know if we will pull our collective fingers out? You don’t either, you hope we will as do I.

I am trying to make the point that it is not a fait accompli that we return to the healthier movement, use of space, and delivery into the forward line that we have seen previously. ESPECIALLY, considering this was the original sin of this team in through 2020 - pumping the ball forward into nothingness.

Personally, I think they need the leaders to take on the game more and take that extra half second and lower their eyes AND they may need to pair that with pulling back the press a bit to allow us to have more space to move the footy with confidence. It’s too suffocating and we have no space for structure and space to move into.

Fair enough RP.

Apologies, i wasn't trying to create a Lord Nev style gotcha circular argument. 

I am life long punter on the ponies. That experience has informed how i analyze football.

For example, critical data for horse punters is the form.

Obviously current form, but even more important is historical form and patterns - both for specific horses and more broadly (for example the record of international 3 year olds in the Melbourne cup).  

I apply the same lens to footy and the dees trajectory. Of course history is not a iron clad predictor of future events, but it is an excellent guide - in horses and footy.

Based on the evidence and history, i strongly believe that in all probability, that by round 19 or 20 the way we play will change, just as it did in 2021 and 2022, with our scores going up, the game style being more expansive and looking like rounds 1-6 this year.

And it wont be because we (not suggesting these are your views, well except for pulling the finger out) :

  • Have rediscovered our dare (like it was hiding behind the couch)
  • Pulled our finger out
  • Just decided to play differently
  • Stood up
  • Recognized the folly of our  current method
  • Any other mystical explanation 

It will be, just like a horse trainer plotting to win a group one race, because it is a forensically planned out campaign.

Edited by binman
  • Love 1
Posted

I don’t think this has been addressed previously….

I think it’s worthwhile that all the attendees that went to dinner at Entrecote return to the restaurant, wearing the same clothes, same table, same meals, but this time May punches Melksham at the stroke of midnight to reverse this bad juju that has followed ever since.

 

Doc Brown GIF by Back to the Future Trilogy

  • Haha 3

Posted
5 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

Another stat I'd love to see (maybe @WheeloRatings can help us out) is our percentage of scoring chains from the back half vs from the front half. It feels like recently our scores are coming from forward half turnovers/stoppages a lot more than earlier in the year when we were able to generate more scores from our back half.

Here are the points from defensive chains, forward chains and centre bounces for the last three seasons, and for each round this season. The percentage of points from the defensive half is higher this season than the previous two season, but has only been above our 2023 season average in two of our last eight matches (Carlton & Collingwood).

We average 33.5 points per match from the defensive half this season, but have only scored 15 points in total over the past two weeks.

Points scored from chain origin

Season Round Opposition Defensive % Forward % Centre
Bounce
%
2021     716 31.9 1164 51.8 366 16.3
2022     748 35.9 1021 49.0 314 15.1
2023     503 37.4 681 50.6 161 12.0
2023 Round 1 Western Bulldogs 78 67.8 25 21.7 12 10.4
2023 Round 2 Brisbane 38 46.3 38 46.3 6 7.3
2023 Round 3 Sydney 43 32.1 70 52.2 21 15.7
2023 Round 4 West Coast 50 39.7 69 54.8 7 5.6
2023 Round 5 Essendon 32 41.6 30 39.0 15 19.5
2023 Round 6 Richmond 27 28.1 57 59.4 12 12.5
2023 Round 7 North Melbourne 55 39.6 59 42.4 25 18.0
2023 Round 8 Gold Coast 21 23.3 60 66.7 9 10.0
2023 Round 9 Hawthorn 32 31.1 70 68.0 1 1.0
2023 Round 10 Port Adelaide 20 26.3 43 56.6 13 17.1
2023 Round 11 Fremantle 17 23.6 36 50.0 19 26.4
2023 Round 12 Carlton 47 77.0 12 19.7 2 3.3
2023 Round 13 Collingwood 28 42.4 26 39.4 12 18.2
2023 Round 15 Geelong 4 6.3 58 92.1 1 1.6
2023 Round 16 Greater Western Sydney 11 24.4 28 62.2 6 13.3

 

Here is a further disaggregation of defensive chains, separating turnovers, kick-ins and stoppages (limited to where Melbourne won the clearance). We score from roughly 13% of defensive half stoppages and defensive half clearances, but has been much lower in the last two weeks.

Defensive half chains by category

Season Round Opposition Chains Scored % Score Points /
Chain
Turnover
2021     1268 154 12.1 554 0.44
2022     1177 148 12.6 553 0.47
2023     744 95 12.8 350 0.47
2023 Round 1 Western Bulldogs 55 13 23.6 58 1.05
2023 Round 2 Brisbane 53 5 9.4 20 0.38
2023 Round 3 Sydney 40 5 12.5 25 0.62
2023 Round 4 West Coast 42 7 16.7 32 0.76
2023 Round 5 Essendon 49 5 10.2 20 0.41
2023 Round 6 Richmond 56 7 12.5 27 0.48
2023 Round 7 North Melbourne 50 6 12.0 31 0.62
2023 Round 8 Gold Coast 48 5 10.4 20 0.42
2023 Round 9 Hawthorn 52 9 17.3 24 0.46
2023 Round 10 Port Adelaide 50 4 8.0 14 0.28
2023 Round 11 Fremantle 44 6 13.6 16 0.36
2023 Round 12 Carlton 38 6 15.8 21 0.55
2023 Round 13 Collingwood 45 7 15.6 27 0.60
2023 Round 15 Geelong 57 4 7.0 4 0.07
2023 Round 16 Greater Western Sydney 65 6 9.2 11 0.17
Kick-in
2021     191 19 9.9 59 0.31
2022     219 10 4.6 40 0.18
2023     140 9 6.4 44 0.31
2023 Round 1 Western Bulldogs 11 2 18.2 12 1.09
2023 Round 2 Brisbane 9 1 11.1 6 0.67
2023 Round 3 Sydney 12 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 4 West Coast 9 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 5 Essendon 14 2 14.3 12 0.86
2023 Round 6 Richmond 12 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 7 North Melbourne 7 2 28.6 12 1.71
2023 Round 8 Gold Coast 7 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 9 Hawthorn 6 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 10 Port Adelaide 14 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 11 Fremantle 7 1 14.3 1 0.14
2023 Round 12 Carlton 8 1 12.5 1 0.12
2023 Round 13 Collingwood 8 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 15 Geelong 12 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 16 Greater Western Sydney 4 0 0.0 0 0.00
Stoppage (Other)
2021     310 28 9.0 103 0.33
2022     300 45 15.0 155 0.52
2023     184 24 13.0 109 0.59
2023 Round 1 Western Bulldogs 9 3 33.3 8 0.89
2023 Round 2 Brisbane 18 2 11.1 12 0.67
2023 Round 3 Sydney 7 3 42.9 18 2.57
2023 Round 4 West Coast 12 3 25.0 18 1.50
2023 Round 5 Essendon 15 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 6 Richmond 12 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 7 North Melbourne 11 2 18.2 12 1.09
2023 Round 8 Gold Coast 14 1 7.1 1 0.07
2023 Round 9 Hawthorn 11 3 27.3 8 0.73
2023 Round 10 Port Adelaide 11 1 9.1 6 0.55
2023 Round 11 Fremantle 10 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 12 Carlton 15 5 33.3 25 1.67
2023 Round 13 Collingwood 16 1 6.2 1 0.06
2023 Round 15 Geelong 11 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 16 Greater Western Sydney 12 0 0.0 0 0.00

 

All defensive half chains

Season Round Opposition Chains Scored % Score Points /
Chain
2021     1769 201 11.4 716 0.40
2022     1696 203 12.0 748 0.44
2023     1068 128 12.0 503 0.47
2023 Round 1 Western Bulldogs 75 18 24.0 78 1.04
2023 Round 2 Brisbane 80 8 10.0 38 0.47
2023 Round 3 Sydney 59 8 13.6 43 0.73
2023 Round 4 West Coast 63 10 15.9 50 0.79
2023 Round 5 Essendon 78 7 9.0 32 0.41
2023 Round 6 Richmond 80 7 8.8 27 0.34
2023 Round 7 North Melbourne 68 10 14.7 55 0.81
2023 Round 8 Gold Coast 69 6 8.7 21 0.30
2023 Round 9 Hawthorn 69 12 17.4 32 0.46
2023 Round 10 Port Adelaide 75 5 6.7 20 0.27
2023 Round 11 Fremantle 61 7 11.5 17 0.28
2023 Round 12 Carlton 61 12 19.7 47 0.77
2023 Round 13 Collingwood 69 8 11.6 28 0.41
2023 Round 15 Geelong 80 4 5.0 4 0.05
2023 Round 16 Greater Western Sydney 81 6 7.4 11 0.14
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Only at Melbourne...

 

 

"Winning" 

Posted
12 hours ago, WheeloRatings said:

Here are the points from defensive chains, forward chains and centre bounces for the last three seasons, and for each round this season. The percentage of points from the defensive half is higher this season than the previous two season, but has only been above our 2023 season average in two of our last eight matches (Carlton & Collingwood).

We average 33.5 points per match from the defensive half this season, but have only scored 15 points in total over the past two weeks.

Points scored from chain origin

Season Round Opposition Defensive % Forward % Centre
Bounce
%
2021     716 31.9 1164 51.8 366 16.3
2022     748 35.9 1021 49.0 314 15.1
2023     503 37.4 681 50.6 161 12.0
2023 Round 1 Western Bulldogs 78 67.8 25 21.7 12 10.4
2023 Round 2 Brisbane 38 46.3 38 46.3 6 7.3
2023 Round 3 Sydney 43 32.1 70 52.2 21 15.7
2023 Round 4 West Coast 50 39.7 69 54.8 7 5.6
2023 Round 5 Essendon 32 41.6 30 39.0 15 19.5
2023 Round 6 Richmond 27 28.1 57 59.4 12 12.5
2023 Round 7 North Melbourne 55 39.6 59 42.4 25 18.0
2023 Round 8 Gold Coast 21 23.3 60 66.7 9 10.0
2023 Round 9 Hawthorn 32 31.1 70 68.0 1 1.0
2023 Round 10 Port Adelaide 20 26.3 43 56.6 13 17.1
2023 Round 11 Fremantle 17 23.6 36 50.0 19 26.4
2023 Round 12 Carlton 47 77.0 12 19.7 2 3.3
2023 Round 13 Collingwood 28 42.4 26 39.4 12 18.2
2023 Round 15 Geelong 4 6.3 58 92.1 1 1.6
2023 Round 16 Greater Western Sydney 11 24.4 28 62.2 6 13.3

 

Here is a further disaggregation of defensive chains, separating turnovers, kick-ins and stoppages (limited to where Melbourne won the clearance). We score from roughly 13% of defensive half stoppages and defensive half clearances, but has been much lower in the last two weeks.

Defensive half chains by category

Season Round Opposition Chains Scored % Score Points /
Chain
Turnover
2021     1268 154 12.1 554 0.44
2022     1177 148 12.6 553 0.47
2023     744 95 12.8 350 0.47
2023 Round 1 Western Bulldogs 55 13 23.6 58 1.05
2023 Round 2 Brisbane 53 5 9.4 20 0.38
2023 Round 3 Sydney 40 5 12.5 25 0.62
2023 Round 4 West Coast 42 7 16.7 32 0.76
2023 Round 5 Essendon 49 5 10.2 20 0.41
2023 Round 6 Richmond 56 7 12.5 27 0.48
2023 Round 7 North Melbourne 50 6 12.0 31 0.62
2023 Round 8 Gold Coast 48 5 10.4 20 0.42
2023 Round 9 Hawthorn 52 9 17.3 24 0.46
2023 Round 10 Port Adelaide 50 4 8.0 14 0.28
2023 Round 11 Fremantle 44 6 13.6 16 0.36
2023 Round 12 Carlton 38 6 15.8 21 0.55
2023 Round 13 Collingwood 45 7 15.6 27 0.60
2023 Round 15 Geelong 57 4 7.0 4 0.07
2023 Round 16 Greater Western Sydney 65 6 9.2 11 0.17
Kick-in
2021     191 19 9.9 59 0.31
2022     219 10 4.6 40 0.18
2023     140 9 6.4 44 0.31
2023 Round 1 Western Bulldogs 11 2 18.2 12 1.09
2023 Round 2 Brisbane 9 1 11.1 6 0.67
2023 Round 3 Sydney 12 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 4 West Coast 9 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 5 Essendon 14 2 14.3 12 0.86
2023 Round 6 Richmond 12 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 7 North Melbourne 7 2 28.6 12 1.71
2023 Round 8 Gold Coast 7 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 9 Hawthorn 6 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 10 Port Adelaide 14 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 11 Fremantle 7 1 14.3 1 0.14
2023 Round 12 Carlton 8 1 12.5 1 0.12
2023 Round 13 Collingwood 8 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 15 Geelong 12 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 16 Greater Western Sydney 4 0 0.0 0 0.00
Stoppage (Other)
2021     310 28 9.0 103 0.33
2022     300 45 15.0 155 0.52
2023     184 24 13.0 109 0.59
2023 Round 1 Western Bulldogs 9 3 33.3 8 0.89
2023 Round 2 Brisbane 18 2 11.1 12 0.67
2023 Round 3 Sydney 7 3 42.9 18 2.57
2023 Round 4 West Coast 12 3 25.0 18 1.50
2023 Round 5 Essendon 15 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 6 Richmond 12 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 7 North Melbourne 11 2 18.2 12 1.09
2023 Round 8 Gold Coast 14 1 7.1 1 0.07
2023 Round 9 Hawthorn 11 3 27.3 8 0.73
2023 Round 10 Port Adelaide 11 1 9.1 6 0.55
2023 Round 11 Fremantle 10 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 12 Carlton 15 5 33.3 25 1.67
2023 Round 13 Collingwood 16 1 6.2 1 0.06
2023 Round 15 Geelong 11 0 0.0 0 0.00
2023 Round 16 Greater Western Sydney 12 0 0.0 0 0.00

 

All defensive half chains

Season Round Opposition Chains Scored % Score Points /
Chain
2021     1769 201 11.4 716 0.40
2022     1696 203 12.0 748 0.44
2023     1068 128 12.0 503 0.47
2023 Round 1 Western Bulldogs 75 18 24.0 78 1.04
2023 Round 2 Brisbane 80 8 10.0 38 0.47
2023 Round 3 Sydney 59 8 13.6 43 0.73
2023 Round 4 West Coast 63 10 15.9 50 0.79
2023 Round 5 Essendon 78 7 9.0 32 0.41
2023 Round 6 Richmond 80 7 8.8 27 0.34
2023 Round 7 North Melbourne 68 10 14.7 55 0.81
2023 Round 8 Gold Coast 69 6 8.7 21 0.30
2023 Round 9 Hawthorn 69 12 17.4 32 0.46
2023 Round 10 Port Adelaide 75 5 6.7 20 0.27
2023 Round 11 Fremantle 61 7 11.5 17 0.28
2023 Round 12 Carlton 61 12 19.7 47 0.77
2023 Round 13 Collingwood 69 8 11.6 28 0.41
2023 Round 15 Geelong 80 4 5.0 4 0.05
2023 Round 16 Greater Western Sydney 81 6 7.4 11 0.14

15?! 15?!!!

Obviously hard to transition in the wet but geez. 

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, layzie said:

15?! 15?!!!

Obviously hard to transition in the wet but geez. 

We can all see it but the brains trust are struggling to manage the required change. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/3/2023 at 8:37 AM, rpfc said:

I think this is absolute nonsense.

Still think so? 

Right now he does not want to be out there. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    TRAINING: Friday 22nd November 2024

    Demonland Trackwatchers were out in force on a scorching morning out at Gosch's Paddock for the final session before the whole squad reunites for the Preseason Training Camp. DEMONLAND'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS It’s going to be a scorcher today but I’m in the shade at Gosch’s Paddock ready to bring you some observations from the final session before the Preseason Training Camp next week.  Salem, Fritsch & Campbell are already on the track. Still no number on Campbell’s

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports 2

    UP IN LIGHTS by Whispering Jack

    Those who watched the 2024 Marsh AFL National Championships closely this year would not be particularly surprised that Melbourne selected Victoria Country pair Harvey Langford and Xavier Lindsay on the first night of the AFL National Draft. The two left-footed midfielders are as different as chalk and cheese but they had similar impacts in their Coates Talent League teams and in the National Championships in 2024. Their interstate side was edged out at the very end of the tournament for tea

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Special Features

    TRAINING: Wednesday 20th November 2024

    It’s a beautiful cool morning down at Gosch’s Paddock and I’ve arrived early to bring you my observations from today’s session. DEMONLAND'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Reigning Keith Bluey Truscott champion Jack Viney is the first one out on the track.  Jack’s wearing the red version of the new training guernsey which is the only version available for sale at the Demon Shop. TRAINING: Viney, Clarry, Lever, TMac, Rivers, Petty, McVee, Bowey, JVR, Hore, Tom Campbell (in tr

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    TRAINING: Monday 18th November 2024

    Demonland Trackwatchers ventured down to Gosch's Paddock for the final week of training for the 1st to 4th Years until they are joined by the rest of the senior squad for Preseason Training Camp in Mansfield next week. WAYNE RUSSELL'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS No Ollie, Chin, Riv today, but Rick & Spargs turned up and McDonald was there in casual attire. Seston, and Howes did a lot of boundary running, and Tom Campbell continued his work with individual trainer in non-MFC

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    2024 Player Reviews: #11 Max Gawn

    Champion ruckman and brilliant leader, Max Gawn earned his seventh All-Australian team blazer and constantly held the team up on his shoulders in what was truly a difficult season for the Demons. Date of Birth: 30 December 1991 Height: 209cm Games MFC 2024: 21 Career Total: 224 Goals MFC 2024: 11 Career Total: 109 Brownlow Medal Votes: 13 Melbourne Football Club: 2nd Best & Fairest: 405 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 12

    2024 Player Reviews: #36 Kysaiah Pickett

    The Demons’ aggressive small forward who kicks goals and defends the Demons’ ball in the forward arc. When he’s on song, he’s unstoppable but he did blot his copybook with a three week suspension in the final round. Date of Birth: 2 June 2001 Height: 171cm Games MFC 2024: 21 Career Total: 106 Goals MFC 2024: 36 Career Total: 161 Brownlow Medal Votes: 3 Melbourne Football Club: 4th Best & Fairest: 369 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    TRAINING: Friday 15th November 2024

    Demonland Trackwatchers took advantage of the beautiful sunshine to head down to Gosch's Paddock and witness the return of Clayton Oliver to club for his first session in the lead up to the 2025 season. DEMONLAND'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Clarry in the house!! Training: JVR, McVee, Windsor, Tholstrup, Woey, Brown, Petty, Adams, Chandler, Turner, Bowey, Seston, Kentfield, Laurie, Sparrow, Viney, Rivers, Jefferson, Hore, Howes, Verrall, AMW, Clarry Tom Campbell is here

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    2024 Player Reviews: #7 Jack Viney

    The tough on baller won his second Keith 'Bluey' Truscott Trophy in a narrow battle with skipper Max Gawn and Alex Neal-Bullen and battled on manfully in the face of a number of injury niggles. Date of Birth: 13 April 1994 Height: 178cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 219 Goals MFC 2024: 10 Career Total: 66 Brownlow Medal Votes: 8

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 3

    TRAINING: Wednesday 13th November 2024

    A couple of Demonland Trackwatchers braved the rain and headed down to Gosch's paddock to bring you their observations from the second day of Preseason training for the 1st to 4th Year players. DITCHA'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS I attended some of the training today. Richo spoke to me and said not to believe what is in the media, as we will good this year. Jefferson and Kentfield looked big and strong.  Petty was doing all the training. Adams looked like he was in rehab.  KE

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...