Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Is this too far fetched?  We are carrying on about forward lines, and also about how Max is below his best and too busy trying to share with Grundy...could this be an option?  Sure would make a good target!

  • Demonland changed the title to Gawn Main Ruck, Grundy Up Forward?
 

Gawn is a better forward than Grundy, pretty easy to see. Id like to see a full game of Gawn forward and Grundy in the ruck the whole time. Grundy has played his best footy for us when Gawn was injured and he rucked the whole game surprise surprise. 

  • Author
21 minutes ago, Lewis said:

Gawn is a better forward than Grundy, pretty easy to see. Id like to see a full game of Gawn forward and Grundy in the ruck the whole time. Grundy has played his best footy for us when Gawn was injured and he rucked the whole game surprise surprise. 

Can't ignore that Gawn rucking led us to premiership though...now maybe things have changed since then, but there's some chatter about Gawn being better off on his own, not sure if that's true but let's say it might be, surely just send Grundy forward and teach him to kick better, he'd make a decent tall target at least and Max can go back to doing his thing without trying to figure out some new ruck combo.

It wasn't broke, so why are we fixing it?

 
Just now, Young Angus said:

Can't ignore that Gawn rucking led us to premiership though...now maybe things have changed since then, but there's some chatter about Gawn being better off on his own, not sure if that's true but let's say it might be, surely just send Grundy forward and teach him to kick better, he'd make a decent tall target at least and Max can go back to doing his thing without trying to figure out some new ruck combo.

It wasn't broke, so why are we fixing it?

Gawn had Luke Jackson rucking a lot in our flag year ... 

  • Author
2 minutes ago, Smokey said:

Gawn had Luke Jackson rucking a lot in our flag year ... 

Very true...is Grundy trying to replace Jackson's role or are they trying to have him ruck a bit more than Jackson was?

Lots of things worked a lot better that year, not just the ruck.


Gary Lyon was campaigning for Gawn to play the majority of minutes in the ruck, last night on "The Couch"

He obviously didn't say this but I got the impression from Lyon that if Grundy's forward craft didn't improve then Casey could be an option for Grundy.

42 minutes ago, Lewis said:

Gawn is a better forward than Grundy, pretty easy to see. Id like to see a full game of Gawn forward and Grundy in the ruck the whole time. Grundy has played his best footy for us when Gawn was injured and he rucked the whole game surprise surprise. 

Maybe Gawn is better at winning contested marks, but below average when taking set shots.

Grundy is better at kicking.

Which one we need the most?

the experiment isn’t working. Max is nowhere near AA form for the first time in 7 years years. neither can play fwd well. Especially now in the wet winter months we are exposed. 

Im tempted to drop Grundy and play Brown - an actual fwd who can lead and not get in the others way. 

massive call but it’s worth considering imo

 
17 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Gary Lyon was campaigning for Gawn to play the majority of minutes in the ruck, last night on "The Couch"

He obviously didn't say this but I got the impression from Lyon that if Grundy's forward craft didn't improve then Casey could be an option for Grundy.

Well that’s a wasted $600k…

We just need to commit to what was the intention - Grundy more ruck and Gawn deep forward. 

Then we need to move it to Gawn’s favour and allow Brodie to play like he is comfortable playing when in the ruck. 

Gawn holding up the team as he slowly saunters forward from the ruck because we are bereft of faith and trust in our forwards doesn’t help. Nor does our lack of a number 1 forward to make Gawn a point of difference in the pocket.

The ruck situation isn’t a problem in my eyes, we are dominating contest and ground balls against good teams and that was one of the worries of being too tall.

We just aren’t making the most of our opportunities when past halfway.

3 minutes ago, DubDee said:

the experiment isn’t working. Max is nowhere near AA form for the first time in 7 years years. neither can play fwd well. Especially now in the wet winter months we are exposed. 

Im tempted to drop Grundy and play Brown - an actual fwd who can lead and not get in the others way. 

massive call but it’s worth considering imo

Gawn remaining in AA form was never in the cards once Grundy was brought in. It is to add 3 years to his career and develop into a forward that can kick 35 goals a season.


1 minute ago, rpfc said:

Gawn remaining in AA form was never in the cards once Grundy was brought in. It is to add 3 years to his career and develop into a forward that can kick 35 goals a season.

problem is he’s not a fwd. he has 7 goals this season. i don’t think he will suddenly develop into one  i know he plays fwd only part time

i don’t care if Gawn is AA as such. it just highlights his diminished impact. As our captain i think it also impacts the team

Hi all, I’ve had a question gnawing at me.  (Please go easy- first time poster and not sure where else I could get an answer).  After the Collingwood match I heard a few say that Fritch going to Moore was a good tactical move. This I found confusing because I assumed that the defenders would dictate who they match up with.  Can anybody enlighten me? 

One thing I hate about Gawn's game this year is his propensity to grab the ball out of the ruck and hack a high kick straight up the chimney or at best to the edge of the centre square. What's the point of the midfield if not to tap it to them and get the ball moving quickly away from the contest and deep inside 50 while the forward line is one on ones due to 6-6-6?

25 minutes ago, Roostwo said:

Hi all, I’ve had a question gnawing at me.  (Please go easy- first time poster and not sure where else I could get an answer).  After the Collingwood match I heard a few say that Fritch going to Moore was a good tactical move. This I found confusing because I assumed that the defenders would dictate who they match up with.  Can anybody enlighten me? 

I suppose it will also depend on the strategy that any given team uses. Could be that Collingwood prefers zone defence, in that case all Fritta needs to do is to stay in the vicinity of the area guarded by Moore. On the other hand, if a team prefers man to man coverage, you'd need to have very mobile forwards going up and down the field to confuse/attract the opposition defensive line and create the match ups that you want.

1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Gary Lyon was campaigning for Gawn to play the majority of minutes in the ruck, last night on "The Couch"

He obviously didn't say this but I got the impression from Lyon that if Grundy's forward craft didn't improve then Casey could be an option for Grundy.

That's my reading too of Garry last night. I agree with everyhting he said , and the stats of Grundy being a target are a worry.  He seemed close to deperate in his plea to give back Max his dominant role.

This issue now smells a bit like petty going forward and de-stabilizing another strenght - our Flad standard defence.

I hope Goody and team have a plan and we don't see another wasted year for this group.


Gawn as the main ruck

Grundy as sub

BB back in for Chandler

Bowey for ANB

Genuine forwards when available pls.  No wanna bees like Grundy and/or Max as a regular option.  They just aren't effective enough, accurate enough (in the case of Max @ 44%) and take up the space of another player who could potentially add alot more value.

4 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Gawn as the main ruck

Grundy as sub

As you say if we had experienced key fowards this would be a worthwhile idea. Not every week but say one in three.

Edited by Diamond_Jim

48 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

As you say if we had experienced key fowards this would be a worthwhile idea. Not every week but say one in three.

Agree on that if we don't DJ.

BB appears ready and should be back in this week.

If Goodwin reads the tea leaves he will come to his senses and Grundy should be the sub to be utilised around 3/4 time or slightly before depending on when / if Gawny is cooked.

Maybe later if Gawn's managing much deeper into a match.

Grundy can also be unleashed for a tall forward if they get injured or having a shocker.  Or maybe played out of their skin, match in the bag and that player put into cotton wool in prep for the following week.

Imagine the oppo ruck getting mauled by Max for 2 to 3 quarters, then having to face a fresh Grundy in the last part of the game.  Terrifying prospect.

The tap bros experiment is unnecessary once the forward line is finalised and has a full compliment of genuine tall forwards.

Which it will have available starting this week on BB's return

Edited by Demon Dynasty

.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

2 hours ago, Young Angus said:

Lots of things worked a lot better that year, not just the ruck.

Maybe, but my memory is that there were a lot of questions about our forward line throughout the season


  • Author
33 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Agree on that if we don't DJ.

BB appears ready and should be back in this week.

If Goodwin reads the tea leaves he will come to his senses and Grundy should be the sub to be utilised around 3/4 time or slightly before depending on when / if Gawny is cooked.

Maybe later if Gawn's managing much deeper into a match.

Grundy can also be unleashed for a tall forward if they get injured or having a shocker.  Or maybe played out of their skin, match in the bag and that player put into cotton wool in prep for the following week.

Imagine the oppo ruck getting mauled by Max for 2 to 3 quarters, then having to face a fresh Grundy in the last part of the game.  Terrifying prospect.

The tap bros experiment is unnecessary once the forward line is finalised and has a full compliment of genuine tall forwards.

Which it will have available starting this week on BB's return

Like this idea!

The problem is, both just aren't forwards. Bit hard to teach this late in their careers, you either have it or you don't.

 
1 hour ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Agree on that if we don't DJ.

BB appears ready and should be back in this week.

If Goodwin reads the tea leaves he will come to his senses and Grundy should be the sub to be utilised around 3/4 time or slightly before depending on when / if Gawny is cooked.

Maybe later if Gawn's managing much deeper into a match.

Grundy can also be unleashed for a tall forward if they get injured or having a shocker.  Or maybe played out of their skin, match in the bag and that player put into cotton wool in prep for the following week.

Imagine the oppo ruck getting mauled by Max for 2 to 3 quarters, then having to face a fresh Grundy in the last part of the game.  Terrifying prospect.

The tap bros experiment is unnecessary once the forward line is finalised and has a full compliment of genuine tall forwards.

Which it will have available starting this week on BB's return

There's no way we got Grundy and pay him what we do to play one quarter every week. I like the outside of the box thinking though, but can't see it happening.

Ron Barassi didn't break through as a gun player until a role was invented for him... that being ruck-rover.  This suggestion may be howled down etc  but why not play Grundy as a mid/ruck-rover? He could tag-team with Gawn then. The competition may never look the same. 

When one of these players gets tired they could rest in the back pocket, a la Ted Lees.  (https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/pp-melbourne-demons--ted-lees


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 528 replies