Jump to content

Featured Replies

Most interesting point is Port dont appear to have anything to offer/trade and Crows already recruited forward star Rankine for gazillions of cash.

That leaves WA sides.

Good chance he re-signs and goes for the big coin in his mid twenties. 

 
2 hours ago, DeeMee said:

I do wonder if he wants to stay what would the holdup be on just signing a contract and having it out of the way given he may dislike attention and constant media harassment.

His management would have put what they want long ago, the club would agree or counter offer, negotiate, agreement reached and all done.

Only possible reasons I can think of:

1. Wait until part way through season when great form increases value but this is offset by possible bad form or injury.

2. Negotiators on one side or the other can not read or send emails.

3. He genuinely does not know if he wants to stay or not - seems unlikely by now surely.

4. Club holding off announcing for a maximum impact time - increase members sign up - seems cynical manipulation.

4. He knows he wants to go so will wait until end of season.

I cannot think of any other scenarios so fear he may be gone next year.

6. Instructed his manager to open negotiations only once the number of Demonland comments on his contract surpasses 6,000 like Jacko 

1. Freo: no draft capital
2. Port: no draft capital
3. Adelaide: Rankine, Rachelle....no need for Pickett?
4. WCE: Unlikely to part ways with a potential top 4 pick for a small forward you'd suspect

Intriguing stuff 

 
52 minutes ago, adonski said:

1. Freo: no draft capital
2. Port: no draft capital
3. Adelaide: Rankine, Rachelle....no need for Pickett?
4. WCE: Unlikely to part ways with a potential top 4 pick for a small forward you'd suspect

Intriguing stuff 

This is where the NBA model could be interesting / you can trade picks up to 7 years into the future, either protected or unprotected (ie conditional).

With player power on the rise AND many clubs looking to do the best thing by their players (like Melbourne with Jackson), there is a risk of inequality in trades with the current set of drafting rules. 

Expand the rules. It’ll be more fun too.

5 hours ago, TRIGON said:

To keep the MFCSS cortisol levels pumping though - Trent Rivers. Out of contract and the Eagles have the draft currency.

I wouldn't want to lose him, but he is not our main priority at the moment. I think he is coverable with our depth without much of a hiccup. Are we going to get WCE Pick 5? unlikely. But maybe worth a 2nd rounder. 


Pickett is a “must keep” player.   Scoring power is critical and he has delivered 40 goals across both of the last 2 years, as a 20 and 21 year old.   Plus his excitement factor is unrivaled in my opinion, but I’m biased. Kozzzzzy is a star. 

13 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

I wouldn't want to lose him, but he is not our main priority at the moment. I think he is coverable with our depth without much of a hiccup. Are we going to get WCE Pick 5? unlikely. But maybe worth a 2nd rounder. 

We get a second rounder for Koz, I'll lose my [censored].

Edited by AzzKikA

From a MFCSS perspective

Headline 2024.

“AFL Responds to Pickett Trade Fiasco - From 2024 Where A Nominated Club Has Insufficient Trade Capital, Priority Picks Will Be   Given As Compensation.”

 
14 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

I wouldn't want to lose him, but he is not our main priority at the moment. I think he is coverable with our depth without much of a hiccup. Are we going to get WCE Pick 5? unlikely. But maybe worth a 2nd rounder. 

Feels about right for Rivers BUT it is a good example of how the industry over-values a draft pick. 

 

Here is a guy we got for a mid-second round draft pick 4 years ago and;

 

  • he has already played 50 games (ave time for a 2nd round draft pick to pass 50 games is 8 years)
  • he has developed in a successful environment, 
  • he is a premiership player, 
  • he gets a regular game in a top 4 side in the competition 
  • he probably has 7-10 years left in his career…

 

… yet he is now worth the same as we paid for him… 

 

Footy players depreciate like BMWs.

33 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said:

Feels about right for Rivers BUT it is a good example of how the industry over-values a draft pick. 

 

Here is a guy we got for a mid-second round draft pick 4 years ago and;

 

  • he has already played 50 games (ave time for a 2nd round draft pick to pass 50 games is 8 years)
  • he has developed in a successful environment, 
  • he is a premiership player, 
  • he gets a regular game in a top 4 side in the competition 
  • he probably has 7-10 years left in his career…

 

… yet he is now worth the same as we paid for him… 

 

Footy players depreciate like BMWs.

It’s a fair assessment. He is a known quantity unlike 50% of first rounders. He has upside an potentially can hit another gear that might demand a first rounder. I reckon we can afford to sit on this one a while longer. 


18 hours ago, Deebauched said:

The media speculation wont let up until he signs. Very destabilising for the club.

Destabilising? 

This isn’t Panama in the 80s, it’s a good player that is sought after.

With Oliver and Petracca signed up through the decade, and us being generally [censored] forever - we have zero frame of reference for how to behave when good players come out of contract.

Its embarrassing really.

26 minutes ago, rpfc said:

Destabilising? 

This isn’t Panama in the 80s, it’s a good player that is sought after.

With Oliver and Petracca signed up through the decade, and us being generally [censored] forever - we have zero frame of reference for how to behave when good players come out of contract.

Its embarrassing really.

Hate to say it but you're right. 

23 minutes ago, layzie said:

Hate to say it but you're right. 

That will be in my epitaph, layzie.

He's worth every dollar.

For his size he can kick a decent distance. 

Edited by leave it to deever


The fact is the club has done everything to sign Kozzy up within its list management strategy. You don’t let someone like Kozzy stay on the market this long. I would suggest they are re evaluating its list strategy to up the anti (if not already).

Are they offering more midfield time as a sweetener just like Brayshaw?

The club went hard on Oliver and Trac and they signed.  The anxiety from many is warranted. There  a is real chance he will go. Hopefully the percentages are in our favour.

35 minutes ago, layzie said:

Is he staying yet?

Animated GIF

1 hour ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Kayne doesn’t let this go. Going with it for the past 2 nights in SEN.

I've heard him go on about this several times and he always says Kozzie hates Melbourne (the place, not the Club). But what is his source for that comment? As an aside, did anyone on here interact with Kozzie at the family day and how was his demeanor?

Edited by dworship
Clarity


17 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

Sad.  We live in a world where media knobs who talk into a mic would struggle to get decent employment outside of  sport or corporate politics.

It works and thats why its sad.

I thought if he left it’s more likely to WA. Grew up there and has more family there. Only lived in SA for a couple of years I believe. 

 
9 hours ago, Hunt29 said:

I thought if he left it’s more likely to WA. Grew up there and has more family there. Only lived in SA for a couple of years I believe. 

Think it's the other way around.

11 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

Clearly doesn't think much of Luke Jackson


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 230 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies