Jump to content

Farewell Brodie Grundy

Ouch!
Ouch!
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

I hope Sydney pay pick 25 for Adams. There is no way we are taking less for Grundy who they need more and doesn't have re-occuring soft tissue injuries.

  • Quote
    •  
     
    7 minutes ago, Demonland said:

     

    Isn't too complicated in my view.

    2 x AA ruckman wants to join club with no ruckman

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    On 10/5/2023 at 6:45 PM, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

    I think we need to get another club interested to get a higher premium from the Swans. 

    How bout Geelong maybe we can rock tease them a bit to get a bit of talk around Grunds.

    Swans are the biggest bunch of vultures who prey on the misfortune of players from other clubs and want players for unders everytime.

    Absolute Scrooge's.

    100% right Would Reid be a good get or is he cooked???

  • Quote

    16 minutes ago, Demonland said:

     

    No it's not...or arguably yes...it's a deal so it get done like any other deal according to values/currency/argy bargy..   But is this THAT complicated....NO....  Doing up shoes laces for Purple...is complicated

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    15 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

    Collingwood managed without a ruckman for around six weeks. They won 5 IIRC

    Rucks can be covered

    It's not winning the tap...it's winning the clearance..   can we as a club please get around this concept....

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Clap 2
    2 hours ago, beelzebub said:

    WE aren't paying 700k..   that's the point here

     

    I think you'll find we are (or were)

    Pies $300k

  • Quote
    •  

    The Swans opening offer of 46 and us having Schache as the sub before Grundy was quire pointed

    If we somehow get a pick in the 20's we might be liable to pay some of Grundy's salary (as the Pies did)

  • Quote

    It's not Melbourne's fault that Sydney allowed their last ruckman to retire, before they went out to get another one.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Clap 2

    With both Collingwood and Melbourne wanting pick 25 for Adams and Grundy respectively, I can't see Sydney getting both.  Both Melbourne and Collingwood have told these players that they are required players and a trade would only happen for the right price.  This could be interesting.

    Funnily enough, last night when I mentioned this on a Facebook thread some Sydney nufty said the deal could be done if Sydney and Melbourne do a straight swap of pics - 14 and 25 for 12, 27 and Grundy.  I asked him if he though Melbourne would be that stupid to go with that, given they'd be basically giving Grundy away under that scenario.  Strangely enough he hasn't responded.

    Too many [censored] supporters. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1

    It will be interesting to see if Sydney use him in the ruck or instead just have no one in the ruck, or better still let their star midfielder take the ruck duties while Grundy sits in the stands uninjured.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    14 minutes ago, Macca said:

    The Swans opening offer of 46 and us having Schache as the sub before Grundy was quire pointed

    If we somehow get a pick in the 20's we might be liable to pay some of Grundy's salary (as the Pies did)

    Not according to Collingwood, who yesterday said their deal was with Grundy, not Melbourne or Sydney.  Collingwood would still be liable.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    @Macca you keep tying the draft pick we reciece with some kind of inverse relationship to the proportion (if any) of salary we pay. 

    Is this common?

    I would have thought the more you value someone the more willing you are to pay their salary and offer a better pick not one going the opposite to the other. 

    Understand there has to be a balancing act with a range of factors just interested is this how trades work nowdays?

  • Quote

    6 minutes ago, Katrina Dee Fan said:

    Not according to Collingwood, who yesterday said their deal was with Grundy, not Melbourne or Sydney.  Collingwood would still be liable.

    Of course the Pies are still liable

    I'm talking about paying a percentage of $700k if we want a better placed draft pick (in theory)

    My reading of the deal is that the Swans need Grundy but we need him off the books  ... so a compromised solution could be reached

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    4 minutes ago, Wrecker46 said:

    @Macca you keep tying the draft pick we reciece with some kind of inverse relationship to the proportion (if any) of salary we pay. 

    Is this common?

    I would have thought the more you value someone the more willing you are to pay their salary and offer a better pick not one going the opposite to the other. 

    Understand there has to be a balancing act with a range of factors just interested is this how trades work nowdays?

    Yes but equally, do we value Grundy?

    If so, how on earth does Schache get preferred to Grundy?

  • Quote

    So we got a "not even goodwill" out of handing JJ to them amicably, you know what i mean.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    3 minutes ago, Macca said:

    Yes but equally, do we value Grundy?

    If so, how on earth does Schache get preferred to Grundy?

    And then not get used when our KPF’s were poor on the day. That will go down in history as a wonder of the 21st century Macca.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
    5 minutes ago, old dee said:

    And then not get used when our KPF’s were poor on the day. That will go down in history as a wonder of the 21st century Macca.

    Grundy turns 30 early next year and is on a combined $4Million deal for 4 years ($300k covered by the Pies)

    If we were in need of a first choice ruckman would we be prepared to pay that amount of money plus give away a pick in 20's?  

    For a 30yo ruckman with limitations? Can't play back or forward?

    A pick in the 30's is probably going to happen

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    1 minute ago, Macca said:

    Grundy turns 30 early next year and is on a combined $4Million deal for 4 years ($300k covered by the Pies)

    If we were in need of a first choice ruckman would we be prepared to pay that amount of money plus give away a pick in 20's?  

    For a 30yo ruckman with limitations? Can't play back or forward?

    A pick in the 30's is probably going to happen

    Yes - if we didn’t have a ruckman to field and wanted a premium ruckman. Supply & Demand. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Very poor negotiation on the part of Sydney. An offer like that send all the wrong messages to the market.  We are perfectly entitled to say to Grundy's management, we try to help players out and do quick and fair deals (see JJ and Harmes) and we have tried a fair deal for Brody but we are not going to be treated with contempt, Brody can take it up with the Swans.

  • Quote
    22 minutes ago, Macca said:

    Grundy turns 30 early next year and is on a combined $4Million deal for 4 years ($300k covered by the Pies)

    If we were in need of a first choice ruckman would we be prepared to pay that amount of money plus give away a pick in 20's?  

    For a 30yo ruckman with limitations? Can't play back or forward?

    A pick in the 30's is probably going to happen

    We got Grundy for pick 27 as a 29 year old who hadn’t played a game of footy for almost a year and was still injured while we had the best ruckman in the game on our list. Collingwood rated him BEHIND Cameron and Cox on their list. 

    Sydney have no ruckman, we have no quality mature backup ruckman, we don’t have a problem with cap space, we are likely to replace Hibberd, Dunstan, Harmes with young draftees, giving us MORE cap space.

    We don’t HAVE to trade Grundy, if he wants to sook he can sit in the stands for a year on a million dollars and we have backup if the unthinkable happened and Max got injured, at which stage Grundy would probably get all “I love the Dees” “demon symbol on forehead” again and play well.

    Sydney have to offer us something that makes us want to move him, we don’t make our opponents better for nothing and contrary to the media speculation, we don’t owe Brodie anything, he’s had every chance and would have every chance again next year if he stayed and showed a willingness to work on his flaws. 

    Edited by deejammin'

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    19 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

    Yes - if we didn’t have a ruckman to field and wanted a premium ruckman. Supply & Demand. 

    Well Sydney don't rank him too highly as they've only offered pick 46

    The question is ... do Sydney want him that badly?  

  • Quote
    21 minutes ago, Macca said:

    Grundy turns 30 early next year and is on a combined $4Million deal for 4 years ($300k covered by the Pies)

    If we were in need of a first choice ruckman would we be prepared to pay that amount of money plus give away a pick in 20's?  

    For a 30yo ruckman with limitations? Can't play back or forward?

    A pick in the 30's is probably going to happen

    If we had no ruckman probably Macca, that’s the situation the Swans find themselves in. It will get done eventually. 

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 10

      The Sir Doug Nicholls Round kicks off in Darwin with a Top 4 clash between the Suns and the Hawks. On Friday night the Swans will be seeking to rebound from a challenging start to the season, while the Blues have the Top 8 in their sights after their sluggish start. Saturdays matches kick off with a blockbuster between the Collingwood and Kuwarna with the Magpies looking to maintain their strong form and the Crows aiming to make a statement on the road. The Power face a difficult task to revive their season against a resilient Cats side looking to make amends for their narrow loss last week. The Giants aim to reinforce their top-eight status, while the Dockers will be looking to break the travel hoodoo. The sole Saturday game is a critical matchup for both teams, as the Bulldogs strive to cemet their spot in the top six and the Bombers desperately want break into the 8. Sundays start with a bottom 3 clash between the Tigers and Kangaroos with both teams wanting to avoid the being in wooden spoon contention. The Round concludes with the Eagles still searching for their first win of the season, while the Saints look to keep their finals hopes alive with a crucial away victory. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Brisbane

      And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

        • Thumb Down
      • 9 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Hawthorn

      There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Footscray

      At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Brisbane

      The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Sad
        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 140 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Hawthorn

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • 52 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All