Who comes in and who goes out for our match against the Dockers at the MCG on Saturday?

JV in Please

 

Out: Langdon

In: Viney Out: Dunstan

Just now, WERRIDEE said:

In: Viney Out: Dunstan

Forgot Langdon was out. In Viney Out Langdon

Hoping Viney and Harmes are right to play. Our depth is good, but Dunstan and Melksham are a step down and we need our best up and running to take on Freo. Freo are the best defensive side in the comp this year, so we’ll have our work cut out for us. 

Just now, WERRIDEE said:

Forgot Langdon was out. In Viney Out Langdon

why is Ed out??
I thought it was bruised ribs

 

1 minute ago, Lord Travis said:

Hoping Viney and Harmes are right to play. Our depth is good, but Dunstan and Melksham are a step down and we need our best up and running to take on Freo. Freo are the best defensive side in the comp this year, so we’ll have our work cut out for us. 

Goody said Harmes would be out 2-3 weeks.

Edited May 21, 20223 yr by Lord Nev

Just now, Lord Travis said:

Hoping Viney and Harmes are right to play. Our depth is good, but Dunstan and Melksham are a step down and we need our best up and running to take on Freo. Freo are the best defensive side in the comp this year, so we’ll have our work cut out for us. 

Harmes was 2-3 apparently. Melk a lock for #200.

I thought Dunstan was pretty good defensively but sloppy with the ball. 

1 minute ago, Kent said:

why is Ed out??
I thought it was bruised ribs

 

Can’t speak for Werridee but I just assumed he was out given he was subbed off. If they mentioned once on the broadcast why Langdon went off, I certainly didn’t hear it.

1 minute ago, Nasher said:

Melk a lock for #200.

Not sold on that mate.

7 touches, 1 tackle. Kicked a nice goal, but was invisible pretty much otherwise.

1 minute ago, Nasher said:

Can’t speak for Werridee but I just assumed he was out given he was subbed off. If they mentioned once on the broadcast why Langdon went off, I certainly didn’t hear it.

That was my impression?

1 minute ago, Nasher said:

 If they mentioned once on the broadcast why Langdon went off, I certainly didn’t hear it.

They said it was ribs, but no elaboration as to the severity.

1 minute ago, Lord Nev said:

Not sold on that mate.

7 touches, 1 tackle. Kicked a nice goal, but was invisible pretty much otherwise.

Some classic Melk marking contests that resulted in easy marks to North too. 

Harmes out and doubts over Viney, Langdon. Hopefully they’re back.

None of Melk, Bedford or Dunstan impressed in any way.

Doubt Salem will be ready. 

Left field options would be Turner, Deak Smith, Rosman at half back with Gus to the wing. Baker on the wing. Or Andy Moniz-Wakefield.

Personally I’d really consider a look at Deakyn Smith down back and move Gus back to the wing. 

Yeah I might be wrong with Langdon he may play. Surely Milkshake gets to 200 match winning goal. Thought he was better than Dunstan who is a butcher.

12 minutes ago, Nasher said:

I thought Dunstan was pretty good defensively but sloppy with the ball. 

I agree with the bold bit. He doesn’t anticipate where the teammate will be when his disposal arrives. Consequently his handballs end up behind his teammate. Elementary mistake.

2 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Harmes out and doubts over Viney, Langdon. Hopefully they’re back.

None of Melk, Bedford or Dunstan impressed in any way.

Doubt Salem will be ready. 

Left field options would be Turner, Deak Smith, Rosman at half back with Gus to the wing. Baker on the wing. Or Andy Moniz-Wakefield.

Personally I’d really consider a look at Deakyn Smith down back and move Gus back to the wing. 

No thanks Smith doesn't get enough of the ball yet.

No more Melk please!!!!!

Langdon goes out, Dunstan goes out.

Bedford in, Viney in.

Haven't seen any of the game yet because of work but the afl app lists McDonald as 'out' implying a game ending injury. Is that correct and if so anyone know what injury?

2 minutes ago, Nascent said:

Haven't seen any of the game yet because of work but the afl app lists McDonald as 'out' implying a game ending injury. Is that correct and if so anyone know what injury?

Guessing - But looked like he possibly sprained his ankle twice. Not 100% sure if the same leg, or even if he just twinged the  existing injury the  second time. Reckon he'll be right to go, played out the game.

2 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Guessing - But looked like he possibly sprained his ankle twice. Not 100% sure if the same leg, or even if he just twinged the  existing injury the  second time. Reckon he'll be right to go, played out the game.

He was ok just strapped and got on with it. Same with Petty who looked really sore but played the game out.

Dunstan out for Viney. We don’t need Dunstan if Viney is right to go as even if Langdon is out Dunstan gives us nothing on the wing. 

1/

Out. Dunstan  

In. Viney 

2/

?? Langdon.  We need more run. Consider Baker to bring in 

3/ 

?? Melksham?? Probably stays in to get 200 as Harmes unlikely to be fit and available 

 

And … Salem hopefully back soon - probably for Swans game 

10 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

1/

Out. Dunstan  

In. Viney 

2/

?? Langdon.  We need more run. Consider Baker to bring in 

3/ 

?? Melksham?? Probably stays in to get 200 as Harmes unlikely to be fit and available 

 

And … Salem hopefully back soon - probably for Swans game 

If we need more run we will use Bedford.