Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

Maybe I missed it but I never heard the AFL say that players can’t question decisions.

You can ask for clarification but you can’t question the decision (ie, complain about it).

The first asks for further information about what the umpire’s decision was (eg, ā€œwas that a mark?ā€) and the other one is expressing disagreement with the decision (eg, ā€œthat wasn’t a markā€). You can disagree but you can’t openly express that disagreement.

Just get on with the game. Easy.

Ā 
10 minutes ago, Axis of Bob said:

Just don't complain about the decision.Ā 

Put your ego away and stand the mark like a good team mate, rather than be a selfish individual.

I get your point but it's easier said than done.

It's also seems too subjective.

What about how Viney shakes his head.

Umps make bad calls and it's very hard to keep mum.

Feel for Jack Hayes, have a real soft spot for mature age players wanting a 2nd chance.

 
2 minutes ago, Axis of Bob said:

You can ask for clarification but you can’t question the decision (ie, complain about it).

The first asks for further information about what the umpire’s decision was (eg, ā€œwas that a mark?ā€) and the other one is expressing disagreement with the decision (eg, ā€œthat wasn’t a markā€). You can disagree but you can’t openly express that disagreement.

Just get on with the game. Easy.

What about asking ā€œdidn’t that hit the ground?ā€


I think we need Preussy to run through Higgins like a freight train.Ā 

3 minutes ago, Axis of Bob said:

You can ask for clarification but you can’t question the decision (ie, complain about it).

The first asks for further information about what the umpire’s decision was (eg, ā€œwas that a mark?ā€) and the other one is expressing disagreement with the decision (eg, ā€œthat wasn’t a markā€). You can disagree but you can’t openly express that disagreement.

Just get on with the game. Easy.

So if he asked ā€œdidn’t that hit the ground firstā€ it would be ok?Ā 

Ā 

1 minute ago, leave it to deever said:

Umps make bad calls and it's very hard to keep mum.

I agree that it might be hard, which I do in my own matches. But that is just because I’ve grown up in an environment where openly questioning the umpire was perfectly acceptable, so I do it sometimes. If I grew up in a time where nobody did that because they’d get free kicks paid against them then I’m sure I’d be shutting up.

If a 150kg prop forward in rugby can not complain to the referee, or a 50kg wing attack in netball can not instinctively complain in two of the most ridiculous sports ever created …. then I’m sure we can do it too.

12 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Curiously along with Shetland they are the only constituency in Scotland that always votes Liberal Democrat at every election, resulting in absolute fannies like Alistair Carmichael representing us at Wasteminster.Ā 

Is that where Capt Mainwaring went for his honeymoon?Ā  'It was a cold and lonely place.Ā  There was absolutely nothing to do so i learnt to play the bag pipes'.

The umpire dissent rule adjudication is beyond pathetic. That 50 for pointing at the ground was possibly the lamest thing I’ve ever seen on a football field, and I sat through the Neeld era!

If that’s where the game is headed, then supporters will rightly be switching off.


1 minute ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

What on earth has happened to Whitfield?

Ā Very busy counting his paycheckĀ 

4 minutes ago, sue said:

What about asking ā€œdidn’t that hit the ground?ā€

I’m sure the all did enough year 8 English to understand rhetorical questions …… didn’t they?

What is more puzzling?

How bad GWS is with their list or how St Kilda are top 4?

15 minutes ago, BDA said:

St Kilda have lifted this quarter. Pressure gauge well up

But GW$ just have no spirit: loads and loads of talent but poorly coached, poorly administered, or poorly lead on the field (or any or all combinations of this).

Edited by monoccular


12 minutes ago, Axis of Bob said:

I agree that it might be hard, which I do in my own matches. But that is just because I’ve grown up in an environment where openly questioning the umpire was perfectly acceptable, so I do it sometimes. If I grew up in a time where nobody did that because they’d get free kicks paid against them then I’m sure I’d be shutting up.

If a 150kg prop forward in rugby can not complain to the referee, or a 50kg wing attack in netball can not instinctively complain in two of the most ridiculous sports ever created …. then I’m sure we can do it too.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://comb.io/YH2Cbg&ved=2ahUKEwjIlI7Tzaf3AhUwT2wGHXmDBGcQo7QBegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw2ZDL3s_wDuTb-tDU2bQSXW

Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

Edited by leave it to deever

Just now, monoccular said:

But GW$ just have no spirit: loads and loads of talent but either poorly coached, poorly administered, or poorly lead on the field.

They care about winning as much as I care about bin nightĀ 

Ā 
5 minutes ago, Jontee said:

Is that where Capt Mainwaring went for his honeymoon?Ā  'It was a cold and lonely place.Ā  There was absolutely nothing to do so i learnt to play the bag pipes'.

Dad's Army?Ā 

I wonder how New Zealanders fare when they go up there? I can't imagine the locals take too kindly to being called Sh!tland Islanders.Ā 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Coburg

    The Casey Demons returned to their home ground which was once a graveyard for opposing teams but they managed to gift the four points on offer to Coburg with yet another of their trademark displays of inaccuracy in front of goals and some undisciplined football that earned the displeasure of the umpires late in the game. The home team was welcomed by a small crowd at Casey Fields and looked right at home as it dominated the first three quarters and led for all bar the last five minutes of the game. In the end, they came away with nothing, despite winning everywhere but on the scoreboard and the free kick count.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne

    After four weeks on the road the Demons make their long awaited return to the MCG next Sunday to play in a classic late season dead rubber against the North Melbourne Kangaroos. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 76 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demons were wasteful early before putting the foot down early in the 2nd quarter but they chased tail for the remainder of the match. They could not get their first use of the footy after half time and when they did poor skills, execution and decision making let them down.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 235 replies
  • PODCAST: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Crows.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 22 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kysaiah Pickett and Clayton Oliver. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 26 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road for their 3rd interstate game in 4 weeks as they face a fit and firing Crows at Adelaide Oval. With finals now out of our grasps what are you hoping from the Dees today?

      • Thanks
    • 763 replies