Jump to content

Featured Replies

As you see, he’s super light and relies on his sheer desperation and will to win.  Kicking is so so and heavily left foot oriented.  I think he’s a 4th round 60ish draft pick or a rookie selection for the Dees.  He’s not the Ashcroft or Daicos type father son golden choice.  

 
1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

As you see, he’s super light and relies on his sheer desperation and will to win.  Kicking is so so and heavily left foot oriented.  I think he’s a 4th round 60ish draft pick or a rookie selection for the Dees.  He’s not the Ashcroft or Daicos type father son golden choice.  

I’d agree with that assessment. You’d hope that he may offer more once his body matures. He maybe be serviceable after a year or two in the 2s. 

 

 

Watched the first half of today’s game, he looked good from what I saw. Nice goal on the run and liked his hands in close.


He will be drafted for sure IMO via late pick.

Gets plenty of the ball, runs hard and is fearless. A couple of AFL pre seasons will see him add a bit of size and strength to his frame.

I noted Kynan Brown was listed amongst Vic Metro's best for all 4 of their games but there's not a lot of press about him. Melbourne currently has picks 4, 15, 23, 34, 89. Hopefully that becomes 4, 18, 23, 37 & 92. What's the latest thought about where he's likely to go at the Draft?

 

4 minutes ago, Sydney_Demon said:

I noted Kynan Brown was listed amongst Vic Metro's best for all 4 of their games but there's not a lot of press about him. Melbourne currently has picks 4, 15, 23, 34, 89. Hopefully that becomes 4, 18, 23, 37 & 92. What's the latest thought about where he's likely to go at the Draft?

 

I would think a late-matched (a la wee Woewy) or rookie pick. They're not the same type of player but Blake Drury springs to mind with where he fell in the draft after a good year.

 
9 minutes ago, Roger Mellie said:

I would think a late-matched (a la wee Woewy) or rookie pick. They're not the same type of player but Blake Drury springs to mind with where he fell in the draft after a good year.

So not likely to go in the earlier rounds, and if someone bid for him after that we could use our 5th round pick, or as you say pick him up as a rookie. My understanding with Woewodin is that  they promised him they'd take him with the last pick (65) in the main draft if he wasn't drafed earlier.

The lad is doing everything he can to make it so you gotta love his consistency and efforts.

He looks so small - even in the juniors. 

I can’t imagine he’s going to go within the first couple rounds as he doesn’t look super damaging around the goals and not sure his kicking is as solid as a Judd McVee to play as a lock down defender who can rebound.

Still, he continues to get in the best so I’m keen on the kid and I’m sure he’ll make it to the red and blue as a solid role player.

Fascinated where they will be however 

 


Vic Metro haven’t been great, and Oakleigh haven’t been great, so being the best player in a bad team doesn’t help. 
I think He doesn’t have a trick - he is a really good solid player who gets the best out of himself. Not unlike Woey or Lachie Hunter in his draft year. They are father son, they are not top tier, so there is no story there. Could see a mid to late second bid, but equally see it dropping to 45ish. Won’t go a rookie though - it’s too shallow for that. 

He was in Vic Metro's best players in every game. He is a consistent, reliable accumulator. Plus hard at the ball.

Every team needs these types of players. You know what you are going to get week in/week out.

Loved the way his father played. If he gets close to that level I'd he happy having him as a Melbourne player. I'm not saying you prioritise him but I love to see these father-sons on the list. We got Woey at 65 and he's already showing that that was an astute pick.

6 minutes ago, Sydney_Demon said:

Loved the way his father played. If he gets close to that level I'd he happy having him as a Melbourne player. I'm not saying you prioritise him but I love to see these father-sons on the list. We got Woey at 65 and he's already showing that that was an astute pick.

I love to see the father-sons come through too. My guess is 50's out to rookie but @ChaserJ might have more insight on him as a player and where he might fall.

14 hours ago, Roger Mellie said:

I love to see the father-sons come through too. My guess is 50's out to rookie but @ChaserJ might have more insight on him as a player and where he might fall.

Good guess.

The Age is reporting that recruiters think he will go in the 3rd round (pick 45 to 60) which should be easy for us to match.  Especially as JT doesn't use picks outside the 2nd round.


1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Good guess.

The Age is reporting that recruiters think he will go in the 3rd round (pick 45 to 60) which should be easy for us to match.  Especially as JT doesn't use picks outside the 2nd round.

@Lucifers Hero How does this work? With a 20% discount we would need between 120 & 280 points (for a pick in the 45-60 range) to get him. Can we match that with our 5th round pick or isn't that possible as officially there are no points attached to Pick 89? Would we need to go into deficit for 2024 or should we try to do a pick swap to try to get a late 3rd round pick (3rd Round for a future 3rd Round?). This is different from Woewodin in 2021 as we just used Pick 65 as there were no higher bids. I'd hope that the fact that Kynan's a Melbourne F/S might scare a few other potential bidders away.

16 minutes ago, Sydney_Demon said:

@Lucifers Hero How does this work? With a 20% discount we would need between 120 & 280 points (for a pick in the 45-60 range) to get him. Can we match that with our 5th round pick or isn't that possible as officially there are no points attached to Pick 89? Would we need to go into deficit for 2024 or should we try to do a pick swap to try to get a late 3rd round pick (3rd Round for a future 3rd Round?). This is different from Woewodin in 2021 as we just used Pick 65 as there were no higher bids. I'd hope that the fact that Kynan's a Melbourne F/S might scare a few other potential bidders away.

The 'bold' part is the answer.

I think it is like Woewodin.  iirc in 2021 we did a draft night pick swap of our 3rd round pick (reported as 51) for a future 4th.  Our next pick was 80 something which came in to 65 because teams passed and the number of picks that had been used for points.  

One possible differentiator for him is that he is left-sided, but on the other hand he looks very left-sided ...

13 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

The 'bold' part is the answer.

I think it is like Woewodin.  iirc in 2021 we did a draft night pick swap of our 3rd round pick (reported as 51) for a future 4th.  Our next pick was 80 something which came in to 65 because teams passed and the number of picks that had been used for points.  

Yes, but for Woewodin we didn't have to match a bid from another Club, so we could take him with any late round pick. My understanding was that the Club said to Taj that if he was a higher-round selection by another Club they wouldn't match it but would select him in the main draft if he was still available for Melbourne's last round pick. They coud have taken him as a rookie but there's financial & other implications of doing it via the main rather than rookie draft.
 
The question is if another Club selects Kynan at say from 45 to 60 is the 5th round pick of any use in matching that bid because there are no points attached to it (or do we just throw it away or try to trade it)? Or do we need to trade up or down to get a pick around 50 to get enough points after the 20% discount to match the bid. Are you saying the latter? Or do we go into points deficit for 2024?

59 minutes ago, Sydney_Demon said:

Yes, but for Woewodin we didn't have to match a bid from another Club, so we could take him with any late round pick. My understanding was that the Club said to Taj that if he was a higher-round selection by another Club they wouldn't match it but would select him in the main draft if he was still available for Melbourne's last round pick. They coud have taken him as a rookie but there's financial & other implications of doing it via the main rather than rookie draft.
 
The question is if another Club selects Kynan at say from 45 to 60 is the 5th round pick of any use in matching that bid because there are no points attached to it (or do we just throw it away or try to trade it)? Or do we need to trade up or down to get a pick around 50 to get enough points after the 20% discount to match the bid. Are you saying the latter? Or do we go into points deficit for 2024?

I don't know☹️

Mu guess would be that we use our next available pick. 


On 7/18/2023 at 6:42 PM, Roger Mellie said:

I love to see the father-sons come through too. My guess is 50's out to rookie but @ChaserJ might have more insight on him as a player and where he might fall.

Agree that Kynan currently sits in the 3rd round range.  I thought he performed really well in the Champs, he has good vision in traffic and can see that he’s done a fair amount of work on his kicking, his use during the champs was much neater than I had seen at Oakleigh last year.  He is clearly a hard worker who won’t leave anything to chance to get on an AFL list, so that already puts him in good stead.  Just not enough game changing traits to lift him inside the top 20, but that is perfectly fine.  There’s enough to work with there for Kynan to carve out a solid career.

Brown benefitted from Vic Metro having a pretty shallow midfield group, there are many other years where he wouldn’t have had such a good run playing inside for Metro.  This allowed him to showcase his attributes well I thought, he put up an incredibly consistent performance across the 4 games (another tick). Brown’s skill set works well in an inside role, but as mentioned elsewhere, his slight frame probably means he won’t play that role at AFL level.  He links up play well and has some pace, so could adapt to a high half forward role or small defender. The work ethic looks to be there, which can often be the difference between being draftable or not.

Edited by ChaserJ

7 minutes ago, ChaserJ said:

Agree that Kynan currently sits in the 3rd round range.  I thought he performed really well in the Champs, he has good vision in traffic and can see that he’s done a fair amount of work on his kicking, his use during the champs was much neater than I had seen at Oakleigh last year.  He is clearly a hard worker who won’t leave anything to chance to get on an AFL list, so that already puts him in good stead.  Just not enough game changing traits to lift him inside the top 20, but that is perfectly fine.  There’s enough to work with there for Kynan to carve out a solid career.

Brown benefitted from Vic Metro having a pretty shallow midfield group, there are many other years where he wouldn’t have had such a good run playing inside for Metro.  This allowed him to showcase his attributes well I thought, he put up an incredible consistent performance across the 4 games (another tick). Brown’s skill set works well in an inside role, but as mentioned elsewhere, his slight frame probably means he won’t play that role at AFL level.  He links up play well and has some pace, so could adapt to a high half forward role or small defender. The work ethic looks to be there, which can often be the difference between being draftable or not.

I mean McVee couldn’t even get drafted until the rookie draft. Things can definitely change. 
In JT we trust! 

I always imagined Kynan's name would be pronounced as written ("Ki-nan") but I heard him called "Keenan" somewhere just recently.  Can anybody confirm the correct way to say it?

 
42 minutes ago, ChaserJ said:

Agree that Kynan currently sits in the 3rd round range.  I thought he performed really well in the Champs, he has good vision in traffic and can see that he’s done a fair amount of work on his kicking, his use during the champs was much neater than I had seen at Oakleigh last year.  He is clearly a hard worker who won’t leave anything to chance to get on an AFL list, so that already puts him in good stead.  Just not enough game changing traits to lift him inside the top 20, but that is perfectly fine.  There’s enough to work with there for Kynan to carve out a solid career.

Brown benefitted from Vic Metro having a pretty shallow midfield group, there are many other years where he wouldn’t have had such a good run playing inside for Metro.  This allowed him to showcase his attributes well I thought, he put up an incredible consistent performance across the 4 games (another tick). Brown’s skill set works well in an inside role, but as mentioned elsewhere, his slight frame probably means he won’t play that role at AFL level.  He links up play well and has some pace, so could adapt to a high half forward role or small defender. The work ethic looks to be there, which can often be the difference between being draftable or not.

The work ethic is definitely there. He seemed to be at nearly every stoppage against Vic Country.

1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

I always imagined Kynan's name would be pronounced as written ("Ki-nan") but I heard him called "Keenan" somewhere just recently.  Can anybody confirm the correct way to say it?

maybe depends whether you live in melnourne or belfast?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies