Seems like Plapp and Chaplin are the most likely to go. 

@Demonland

Andy, may I have a copy of the article pm'd to me please.

Edited October 2, 20205 yr by Lucifer's Hero

2 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

May I have a copy of the article pm'd to me please.

Me too, if possible. Much appreciated.

Could i too have copy of article pmd please

Me too please

Not much to the article just stating that it’s finals or bust for the off field team. All football department positions are under review including Richardson/Mahoney. No comment on if Goodwin is under review but you would assume so. Click bait on the Brayshaw/Viney comment 

Can we define “bust”?

Old news  Trac  I  was told Plapp was looking for a job two weeks ago

11 minutes ago, wattsindawes said:

Not much to the article just stating that it’s finals or bust for the off field team. All football department positions are under review including Richardson/Mahoney. No comment on if Goodwin is under review but you would assume so. Click bait on the Brayshaw/Viney comment 

Just to clarify, the article said coaching and fitness and named several people but Mahoney wasn't one of them.  That isn't to say his position isn't being reviewed.

I thought it was good to get some insight into likely players to be contracted.

The review probably explains why Burgess hasn't been recontracted yet - my guess he would take up a sizeable portion of the soft cap.

Edited October 2, 20205 yr by Lucifer's Hero

Can someone pm me the article too please.

Me too.

Thank you

3 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

While the article said "The Demons are assessing all senior positions including the coaching staff and fitness department" and named several people Mahoney wasn't one of them.  That isn't to say his position isn't being reviewed.

I thought it was good to get some insight into likely players to be contracted.

The review probably explains why Burgess hasn't been recontracted yet - my guess he would take up a sizeable portion of the soft cap.

Any idea if it's an internal or external review? And which players were mentioned?

5 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Can someone pm me the article too please.

Tried to send but a message back saying you don't receive messages...

4 minutes ago, Unleash Hell said:

Me too.

Thank you

Sent

15 minutes ago, Mickey said:

Any idea if it's an internal or external review? And which players were mentioned?

It didn't say.

Simeon Thomas-Wilson (don't know who that is) did a complete list analysis.  Too long to repeat but if there is anyone that interests you I can pick that out.

Edit: thought it easier to pm to you - it should be in your inbox.

Edited October 2, 20205 yr by Lucifer's Hero

10 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Just to clarify, the article said coaching and fitness and named several people but Mahoney wasn't one of them.  That isn't to say his position isn't being reviewed.

I thought it was good to get some insight into likely players to be contracted.

The review probably explains why Burgess hasn't been recontracted yet - my guess he would take up a sizeable portion of the soft cap.

You’re right it did say that they are “assessing all senior positions including the coaching staff and fitness department.” Would have thought Mahoney fell under that umbrella.  

1 minute ago, wattsindawes said:

You’re right it did say that they are “assessing all senior positions including the coaching staff and fitness department.” Would have thought Mahoney fell under that umbrella.  

Tehnically Mahoney doesn't fall in one of those departments as he is the boss of coaching and fitness (and other departments)

Will be bitterly disappointed if Mahoney's position isn't reviewed.

If anyone needs the article sent just get in touch via PM and i'll copy it across for you.

As for the article itself, this comes as no surprise and is a welcome development to kick off our off-season.  You would expect a few of those guys not to be with the club when our pre-season kicks off later in the year.

nothing concrete in that story at all

the general vibe around the trips seems to be mahoney, plapp, and probably matthews go, with richardson moving into mahoney's role

i've not heard anything re chaplin and, quite frankly, our defence was strong this year so i'd be hesitant to shake things up enormously back there

no idea re who they're looking at replacements in the coaching ranks

1 minute ago, Wiseblood said:

If anyone needs the article sent just get in touch via PM and i'll copy it across for you.

As for the article itself, this comes as no surprise and is a welcome development to kick off our off-season.  You would expect a few of those guys not to be with the club when our pre-season kicks off later in the year.

I'll get a copy, please, Wise?

1 minute ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

nothing concrete in that story at all

Well nothing can be concrete at this stage until the review is done.

The one positive is that the review is taking place, as it should.

7 minutes ago, wattsindawes said:

You’re right it did say that they are “assessing all senior positions including the coaching staff and fitness department.” Would have thought Mahoney fell under that umbrella.  

Hopefully that means a complete review of every individual with no free passes. Hope  Pert has someone more qualified helping him. He doesn’t have the background to access decision making of a lot of those positions. 
I wouldn’t have thought it had started now but is in the final stages. Not having 1on1s with the players would be a wasted process. 

14 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Tried to send but a message back saying you don't receive messages...

Sent

Try now

4 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

nothing concrete in that story at all

the general vibe around the trips seems to be mahoney, plapp, and probably matthews go, with richardson moving into mahoney's role

i've not heard anything re chaplin and, quite frankly, our defence was strong this year so i'd be hesitant to shake things up enormously back there

no idea re who they're looking at replacements in the coaching ranks

How did you get that from the article?

3 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Try now

Still didn't work.

If you send me a message I can respond.